Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court and Trump are headed for a reckoning in new term
The Washington Post ^ | October 5, 2025 5:00 a.m. EDT | Justin Jouvenal

Posted on 10/05/2025 2:36:35 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

After months of emergency rulings, the justices will be asked to render final verdicts on economic and immigration policies at the core of Trump’s presidency.

The Supreme Court and President Donald Trump are headed for a reckoning.

After months of terse emergency rulings that largely avoided major confrontations with the new administration, the justices will open their new term Monday faced with the need to render full, final verdicts on policies at the core of Trump’s presidency.

“It really is going to be a showdown,” said Jennifer Nou, a law professor at the University of Chicago. “So many of the president’s big-ticket constitutional issues and policy initiatives are quickly coming up before the court. All of this is coming to a head.”

Though it is an emergency appeal, the justices are treating a case over whether Trump can fire Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook like one on the regular docket. It will determine the independence of the central bank and could have major implications for the U.S. economy, businesses and consumers.

The new Supreme Court term, which begins Oct. 6, includes three major cases with huge consequences for voting rights and President Trump’s powers. (Video: Alisa Shodiyev Kaff/The Washington Post, Photo: Tom Brenner/The Washington Post)

The justices could also be called upon in the coming months to issue up-or-down decisions on Trump’s bid to end birthright citizenship, his use of a wartime law to swiftly deport alleged gang members and his effort to strip 300,000 Venezuelan migrants of deportation protections.

The cases will force the justices to either embrace Trump’s sweeping assertions of presidential power or curb them. They set up a major test for the reputation of the court and the success of the president’s agenda, and either way, they appear certain to reshape the law.

“This will be a term in...”


(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 10/05/2025 2:36:35 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The left and democrats ARE heading for a reckoning with the SCOTUS. And, frankly, they’ve already been experiencing it in spades. It’s not a future event. It’s a current event.


2 posted on 10/05/2025 2:39:10 PM PDT by cuban leaf (2024 is going to be one for the history books, like 1939. And 2025 will be more so, like 1940-1945.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“effort to strip 300,000 Venezuelan migrants..”

Interesting how events could change things. Currently US Dept of War has massive forces off the coast of Venezuela targeting drug smugglers from VZ. Both sides seem to be itching for an excuse to go all the way. Events is VZ will impact VZ migrants that are here.


3 posted on 10/05/2025 2:50:46 PM PDT by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Trump is right about birthright citizenship but might lose that one….but he has a very strong case on tariffs Presidents have been protecting various industries for decades using tariffs see Ronald Reagan and the steel industry for instance.


4 posted on 10/05/2025 3:38:38 PM PDT by Lod881019
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lod881019

Nothing should be up to a popular vote Senate. Imagine these fools who can keep the government running negotiating tariff rates.


5 posted on 10/05/2025 4:13:14 PM PDT by wiseprince (Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Pray for the justices.


6 posted on 10/05/2025 4:19:58 PM PDT by lastchance (Cognovit Dominus qui sunt eius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lod881019

Agree. The Constitution is frustratingly imprecise on this and some other details. There will be no real resolution until these sections can be rewritten, which will require a supermajority popular consensus; in other words, never gonna happen.


7 posted on 10/05/2025 5:35:54 PM PDT by _longranger81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The Court has to know the future complete demise or survival of the United States of America hangs in the balance. They will vote for us or against us.

If they vote wrong, then I say “no” to the SCOTUS.

“Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed”.
—Declaration of Independence.

from John Locke:
Governments are formed by a “social contract” with the people to protect these rights.
A government’s legitimacy comes only from the consent of the people it governs.


8 posted on 10/05/2025 6:02:25 PM PDT by frank ballenger (There's a battle outside and it's raging. It'll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

App dreaming, so far Trump has been on a roll with the Supremes.


9 posted on 10/05/2025 7:43:48 PM PDT by kenmcg (ti hi o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson