Posted on 10/02/2025 9:26:34 PM PDT by lasereye
The Nevada Supreme Court unanimously (7-0) rejected the NFL's request to rehear its decision to allow Jon Gruden's lawsuit against the league to proceed in public. It's another significant win for Gruden, who sued the league and commissioner Roger Goodell in 2021, claiming a "malicious and orchestrated campaign" was organized to destroy Gruden's career by leaking his old emails that included offensive language. The lawsuit was filed shortly after Gruden resigned as Raiders coach.
ESPN's Don Van Natta Jr. was the first to report on the development.
In August, the Nevada Supreme Court ruled in favor of Gruden, 5-2, that the NFL Constitution and Bylaws' arbitration clause "does not apply to Gruden as a former employee and is unconscionable." As such, the case could proceed in public instead of going to arbitration as preferred by the NFL.
Article VIII of the NFL Constitution states the commissioner has "full, complete and final authority to arbitrate any dispute involving a member or members in the League or any players or employees of the members of the League or any combination thereof that in the opinion of the Commissioner constitutes conduct detrimental to the best interests of the League or professional football."
However, the decision from August noted that Gruden was no longer an NFL employee when he sued the league, so the arbitration clause did not apply. Furthermore, the ruling said the arbitration clause as a whole -- in which Goodell could rule over disputes involving his own conduct -- has "procedural and substantive unconscionability."
The Nevada Supreme Court judges did not rule on whether Gruden's claims are true or not.
The NFL appealed the ruling, as expected, shortly after it was delivered. Now, however, the league's appeal to rehear the decision has been denied. The NFL can appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States, but the Supreme Court hears very few cases per year. The NFL had hoped that this lawsuit would go to arbitration to avoid potentially damning details becoming public, but it is rapidly running out of options.
The Wall Street Journal first uncovered a 2011 email between Gruden and then-Washington team president Bruce Allen in which Gruden used a racist trope when discussing then-NFLPA president DeMaurice Smith, who is Black. Gruden was not an NFL employee when he sent that email. However, the New York Times uncovered emails ranging from 2010 to 2018, the year Gruden became the Raiders' coach. The emails included Gruden directing vulgarity at Goodell and "casually and frequently" using "misogynistic and homophobic language," per the New York Times' reporting.
Gruden resigned from the Raiders in October 2021, shortly after the New York Times report.
Gruden, 62, is hoping to get back into coaching and has recently expressed interest in the college level. Gruden spent parts of 15 seasons as an NFL head coach. He started with four seasons with the Oakland Raiders before seven with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, where he won a Super Bowl in 2002. After a long stint as an analyst for ESPN, he returned to the Raiders in 2018 before his resignation in 2021. In all, he has a 117-112 record.
Musburger noted that the damaging emails were first leaked to the Wall Street Journal and then, when Gruden initially stayed in his position, additional emails were leaked to the New York Times. This staggered release, he argued, was a deliberate tactic to ensure maximum damage. He said the leak did not come from typical sports reporters, suggesting that whoever was behind it operated outside normal media channels.
Gruden's attorney Adam Hosmer-Henner stated the defendants "secretly leaked Gruden's private correspondence to the Wall Street Journal and New York Times in order to harm Gruden's reputation and force him out of his job."
"There was no explanation or justification for why Gruden's emails were made public out of the 650,000 emails collected in the NFL's investigation of the Washington Football Team or why the emails were held for months before being released in the middle of the Raiders' season."
We want him in Gainesville.
I second that emotion. Or Kiffen.
Gutless “woke” NFL. Make them pay Chucky!
Someone in the NFL has undoubtedly advised him to drop the lawsuit and that he will be compensated in his NFL coaching contract. I would not buy that. He should take a college coaching position and go all out for the NFL suit; the damages should be pretty substantial.
I’ve been seeing this article presented as the top of list story for at least the last four hours.
Usually, there would be a couple more popping up by now.
Must be a slow Thursday evening.
I guess that’s good. No new disasters or unbelievable horrors to read about.
I was thinking the same exact thing as once again the rumors are flying around Gruden wants to coach. I remember Gruden being mentioned when THE Ohio State University and Tennessee jobs were open.
What is it like for you this week with all the Longhorn tea sipper fans in the DFW?
I like it.
Spot on.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.