Posted on 10/02/2025 10:21:07 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Summary
VATICAN CITY, Oct 2 (Reuters) - Pope Leo initially impressed conservative Catholics after his election in May as he embraced traditions shunned by his predecessor Pope Francis and steered clear of hot button social issues that divided the 1.4 billion-member Church.
But his honeymoon with conservatives appears over after he unexpectedly took aim at U.S. President Donald Trump's hard-line immigration policies, questioning whether they were in line with the Church's pro-life teachings.
The Reuters Daily Briefing newsletter provides all the news you need to start your day. Sign up here.
"Someone who says I am against abortion but I am in agreement with the inhuman treatment of immigrants in the United States, I don't know if that's pro-life," Leo, the first U.S. pope, told reporters on Tuesday.
Some critics, who had praised the pope for his early reserve, expressed shock that Leo criticized the current champion of global conservatives.
Former Texas Bishop Joseph Strickland, a fierce Francis critic who was relieved from duty by the late pope but has praised Leo, criticized the new pope on social media for causing "much confusion … regarding the sanctity of human life and the moral clarity of the Church's teaching."
"So tired of papal interviews. He should return to his previous silence," opined the Rorate Caeli blog, which had previously criticised Francis and praised Leo.
The Trump administration, which was sharply critical of Francis but has rarely commented about Leo, also pushed back.
Press secretary Karoline Leavitt said she rejected the characterisation of inhumane treatment of immigrants.
(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...
Send Leo a black of ice. What an ass clown.
block of ice. Oy!
It must be true if it’s from Reuters
Financial aid to the church for illegals may be at risk.
Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost, now Pope Leo XIV. Accusations against Prevost (formerly an archdiocesan leader and bishop) include mishandling sexual abuse cases, failing to initiate investigations into abuse claims, and allowing accused priests to remain in positions or residences near vulnerable children. Advocates and victims’ groups have accused him of enabling abuse through inadequate responses, lack of transparency, and insufficient victim support during his prior roles in Chicago and Peru. Despite some recognition of efforts to address abuse in Peru, these criticisms form the core of backlash against his leadership in handling child sexual assault allegations .
This controversy centers on Prevost’s role before becoming pope. Allegations highlight that while he supervised religious houses or dioceses, priests with credible abuse accusations were permitted to live near children or were not properly investigated. Victim advocacy groups like SNAP have formally complained about Prevost’s past decisions and lack of accountability, calling for independent investigations and zero tolerance for abuse within the Church hierarchy. The allegations have spurred public and media scrutiny worldwide, coinciding with his elevation to the papacy, raising questions about Church reform and justice for survivors
I wonder how much the money to Catholic Charities is part of this.
Good.
Catholic Charities should be explicitly and exclusively CATHOLIC.
Catholic Charities should be explicitly and exclusively CHARITABLE.
Taking Caesar's denarius is antithetical to both of those requirements.
End it ... and the corruption will end as well.
Francis was 100% for illegal immigration, with one exception. No illegal immigration into Vatican City, please.
I suppose Leo will be following that exact same path.
And now it’s time for a fun fact.
Awhile back I did a little calculation. Based on its size, Vatican City can easily take in and house 2500 immigrants. And with its vast wealth, the Vatican has the money to feed, clothe, and educate them all.
Your move, Leo.
Shut up Bob. You are a man just like any of the rest of us. You have NO say over anyone. We do not want to hear anything you have to say. Supposedly a man who stands up for right, or wrong? Then gets involved in politics? Really? I can NOT believe people stay involved with the catholic church with all of this going on. It is UNBELIEVABLE.
You all missed the point. He was ok with a vehement proabort getting a catholic award. Jesus is punishing us, rightly.
Accept it and pray and fast, become holy. Same job as ever! What was right 2000 years ago is and always will be right. Fear not. Despair not. Anger not. L9ve and convert with relationship. Same job.
Proof that the Vatican and Catholic Charities are major contributors to the global immigration invasion.
Two words for Roman Catholics: Unam sanctum.
Catholic Charities is a front for illegals.
It’s not the criticism of President Trump. It’s him embrace of lawlessness (illegal immigration), lack of moral clarity (Durban’s award), and climate activism/cultural relativism.
The lady judge who got arrested helping an illegal escape from her courtroom used to be a leader of Catholic Charities.
Great post!
The most inconsequential ‘leaders’ in the world, Popes.
Not even church attending Catholics listen to the pope. Why is a pope necessary?
The Catechism on illegal immigration. It states that prosperous nations are to weigh in on whether they can take in people. According to their laws
I would venture to say that the pope, like so many people here, are not aware that the illegal aliens here are not only not law abiding, but they are favored by the democrat party whereas in blue states the illegal aliens have more rights than citizens. Police allow them to batter residents. They take funding for living expenses. That they are the democrat voting base, where they are not legally allowed to vote. That they are by their lawlessness causing harm and death, horrific death, to citizens. Innocent citizens. That is not pro life
Nor is promoting the democrat party which garners power by promoting abortion. Primarily.
Below is the catechism’s position on immigration. The pope has not and will not change it. It is common sense and orderly
It begins by addressing prosperous nations
Sorry, at $37 trillion in debt and a young adult generation able to hope for a life of family and prosperity, we are NOT a prosperous nation
2241 The more prosperous nations are obliged, to the extent they are able, to welcome the foreigner in search of the security and the means of livelihood which he cannot find in his country of origin. Public authorities should see to it that the natural right is respected that places a guest under the protection of those who receive him. Political authorities, for the sake of the common good for which they are responsible, may make the exercise of the right to immigrate subject to various juridical conditions, especially with regard to the immigrants’ duties toward their country of adoption. Immigrants are obliged to respect with gratitude the material and spiritual heritage of the country that receives them, to obey its laws and to assist in carrying civic burdens.“
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.