Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Created An ‘Emperor’s New Clothes’ Moment At The UN
American Thinker ^ | September 29, 2025 | Evelyne Joslain

Posted on 09/29/2025 10:43:14 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

At the United Nations gallery for its 80th annual session on September 23, President Trump directly questioned the relevance of what President de Gaulle called “that thingamajig” or “gizmo.” “What is the purpose of the UN?” He asked the Assembly. In other words: What exactly do you exist for? In other words, like the little boy in The Emperor’s New Clothes, during his barnstorming UN speech, Trump told the UN and the EU hard truths that the leaders will ignore but that the people were desperate to hear.

The truth is that the UN is very expensive, has no practical use, has never once achieved its primary objective (which was to arbitrate peace in the world), has been outrageously left-leaning over the decades, and does not even follow its own sacrosanct “international law.”

Trump at the UN. C-SPAN screen grab.

Actually, its bureaucrats have made so-called “international law” the law of its successive secretaries general, who all share a fatal flaw: all are more or less communist-leaning and, in the present day, no less than third-world Marxists. That is to say, they are open supporters in favor of the Third World autocracies and, therefore, are against Western democracies and especially against the American republic that provides the lion’s share of the funds for its operating costs, not to mention its free rent on the Hudson River.

Remember that the UN was of no help in the Korean conflict or in the Cold War and has indeed been leaning in favor of the new axis of evil (Russia/China/Iran) and its cohort of bitter BRICS followers. Trump mentioned he achieved peace in seven so-called irreconcilable world conflicts, thus single-handedly doing the very work of the UN, without the slightest help of these “good for nothing” or rather of...

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 09/29/2025 10:43:15 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

THAT is what I voted for.


2 posted on 09/29/2025 11:01:52 AM PDT by RWGinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“....the UN is very expensive, has no practical use, has never once achieved its primary objective ....” DING! DING! DING! DING! Eggs friggin’ zack lee! And how many gazillions have we pumped into it? Build it in Zimbabwe. Power grabbers and wanna be overlords of mankind. Bottom line!


3 posted on 09/29/2025 11:28:23 AM PDT by rktman (Destroy America from within? On hold! Enlisted USN 1967 proudly. 🚫💉! 🇮🇱🙏! Winning currently!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
The truth is that the UN is very expensive, has no practical use, has never once achieved its primary objective ...

And so-called UN "peace-keeping" forces are rapists and thieves where they are deployed. They're pure evil!

4 posted on 09/29/2025 11:35:23 AM PDT by roadcat ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson