Posted on 09/23/2025 4:34:01 AM PDT by RandFan
LONDON, Sept 22 (Reuters) - Several charities said on Monday they had cut their links with Sarah Ferguson, Britain's Duchess of York, after media reports that she had described the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein as a "supreme friend" in an email.
(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...
The grifter extraordinare is not being cancelled.
She’s being used.
The question is what’s the UK’s Deep State’s endgame.
And does this mean that their Deep State thinks it won’t be able to control William the way it did QEII and does KCIII...
Release the files!
And I would still be interested in knowing why both MI5 and MI6 allowed Epstein and Maxwell continuing access to members of the House of Windsor for well over a decade.
The same files that Deep State left behind for Trump to access/find...?
SNORT.
It has never added up
But that’s the elite for you.
“Release the files!”
Except for Virginia G., all Epstein’s young females are probably still alive. If any of them serviced a person other than Epstein or Maxwell while in their employ, the female or their lawyer can make that known.
Yup, world, he’s a ‘bad boy’.
then shortly afterward
Jeff, you’re a “supreme friend.”
Is there money or potential money in it for victim compensation if they speak out with details or does that take compensation from his estate off the table forever? Plus at least some known victims already received some funds in compensation, I believe, and may have NDAs signed as part of that?
None of these ”Epstein Files” are going to contain video of Hillary hurling scotch glasses at Bill and screaming at him to, ”Get to the Damn island!”
Blackmailers know how to do their job.
So do the states that employ them.
If I get what you’re saying, yes. I would rather see how Epstein was directed and funded than a list of his victims (not to excuse what they did).
This article highlights the “international flavor” of Epstein’s operations.
“I would rather see how Epstein was directed and funded than a list of his victims (not to excuse what they did).”
An excellent point.
I wonder if people within the charity itself have ever had fri3nds decades ago, who later turned out to be perverts or crim8nals? Maybe those people in the chsrity need to be kicked out since the charity apparebtly holds peolle accountible for friendships thst happend decades previously?
You know nothing.
What amazed me most was how cheap the amount Epstein gave Fergie for debt repayment was (estimated around $20,000) that caused such a strong reaction of friendship acknowledgement. I would have thought in those rarified circles, friendship would have gone for a much higher number.
MI5 and MI6 were more than passive players.
They did make them known in court...and they each got paid about half a mil.
My cynical self wonders what “charities” are even allowed to exist in the UK. At this point it would not surprise me to find “The Rotherham Society for the Relief of Pakistani Rapists” or “Caledonian Support Agency for Non-binary Labour Street Theatre Volunteers” lined up against Fergie.
These “victims” were all paid about half a mil. We know of at least two who lied...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.