Regards,
Posted on 09/16/2025 7:32:47 PM PDT by nickcarraway
Houston Texans draw outrage for ‘tone-deaf’ pregame tribute to victims of violence without mentioning Charlie Kirk The Houston Texans held a pregame moment of silence during their Monday Night Football game but did not specifically mention Charlie Kirk. Instead, they honored all victims of violence and natural disasters, sparking debate over whether Kirk deserved a distinct tribute. Other NFL teams took different approaches, with some explicitly honoring Kirk by name. This divided response has fueled discussions about respect, politics, and how tragedies are acknowledged in sports.
Approximately 20 minutes before kickoff at NRG Stadium, the public address system announced the moment of silence. It lasted for 10 seconds and was broadcast live on ESPN. The Texans later explained their decision in a statement:
“We held a moment of silence pregame to honor all victims of violence and natural disasters across the country. Unfortunately, there have been a number of recent tragedies, so we did not think it was appropriate to single any of them out and minimize the others that have occurred.” — MailSport (@MailSport)
This broad approach contrasts sharply with other NFL teams. Notably, the Dallas Cowboys dedicated a clear, explicit tribute to Kirk before their game, with club owner Jerry Jones publicly expressing support for acknowledging the Turning Point USA founder’s assassination by name. NFL’s inconsistent response raises questions
Seven NFL teams chose to observe moments of silence during Week 2, though five refrained from mentioning Kirk specifically. The league itself mandated a silent reflection prior to the Green Bay Packers game at Lambeau Field but left the wording ambiguous.
— SaycheeseDGTL (@SaycheeseDGTL)
Critics argue the Texans’ decision appears like an attempt to sidestep controversy, while others view it as a measured gesture aimed at inclusivity. As the NFL grapples with a sensitive moment in American politics and public life, this split response reflects deeper divisions about how public figures should be remembered after tragic deaths.
Also Read: “Disgusted and saddened”: Ex-Jets star Nick Mangold slams New Jersey town for refusing to lower flags in honor of Charlie Kirk
Whether this generalized approach will satisfy fans and observers remains uncertain, but it has already ignited a spirited debate about respect, recognition, and political implications in sports.
Texas.
They suck when they started being the Oilers.
I never thought I’d ever get NFL news from the Times of India.
The NFL HATES you America.
But you keep watching. :)
Houston: the Laodicea of Texas?
The team CHOKED big time.
Karma is a b***h.
And I should care because…
Not surprising. At all.
I have happily not watched the NFL for quite a few years now.
It’s a bad look when you’re outclassed by Jerry Jones.
The NFL has been dead to me for years. F them.
Well, Jerry Jones is not great, but at least he’s against Roger Goodell.
Well, the majority of teams did have a moment of silence for Charlie Kirk. The NFL mandated Thursday Night Football have one, and left it up to the home team for the other 15 games.
(The NFL has been dead to me for years)
Same here.
Didn’t care much and now even less.
AND 12 NFL teams are now trying to put sissy men on the field as “cheerleaders”.
The NFL and the Homosexual Agenda...
Clicked thread to read about Charlie.
I gave up on the national felon league after the domestic violence incidents involving Ray Rice and Adrian Peterson.
Well said.
Regards,
Houston really isn’t part of Texas anymore since New Orleans moved there after Katrina.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.