Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 08/31/2025 6:07:39 PM PDT by karpov
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
The Global Street Urinal losers chime in.
The WSJ will go down with the sinking globalist ship, and will never admit they were wrong, no matter how successful the tariffs are.
congress gave presidents the power, if the NY times doesn’t like it they need to talk to congress!
Bush and Obama used tariffs, how can they be against the law now?
No one cares about the Mandarin Street Jackasses.
This is WSJ, not NYT.
Not much of a difference is there?
Trump isn’t the tariff king
He kinda is. WSJ should study his background. They might learn something
Ok.
We’re 40 T in debt, WSJ. No thanks to you
Trump will fix it. So. Help, or step aside.
I beg to differ
A panel of judges said it! it must be true then.
Judges said Trump can’t deport illegal aliens either despite it being the law.
“ This is WSJ, not NYT.”
***************************
LOL … is there any difference now-a-days? Just sayin’.
The Constitution is very clear about this:
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises ... (Article 1, Section 8)
Then Slow Joe had no authority to take petroleum out of the Strategic Reserve. There was no emergency except for Rats running for reelection.
The Wall Street Journal forgot to mention that - in most cases - the Trump Tariffs simply EQUALIZE the USA tariffs, against foreign tariffs, that have existed for decades!
And Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission, is no Dairy Queen. 🍦
Just because congress concocted a ‘law’ or ‘act’, and a previous chief executive signed off on it, does not require that a new chief executive is bound to obey it.
This clause deals with commerce between the states, not foreign imports, which are a purview of the executive.
No, it doesn't. And the third clause under that same section completely contradicts what you've said there.
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;
Congress have long abandoned many of their responsibilities.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.