Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UK Struggles to Find Free Speech Balance
Liberty Nation ^ | Aug 24, 2025 | John Klar

Posted on 08/24/2025 9:59:21 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

Online Safety Act draws fire for stifling free expression.

Children are suffering psychological harm from unfiltered social media platforms that expose them to disturbing adult content as well as online predators. The United Kingdom’s initiatives to police the internet to protect children have attracted opposition by those claiming the Online Safety Act (OSA) is a Trojan horse being abused to regulate free speech. Finding the balance is proving to be an ongoing challenge.

Protecting Children Online

The explosion of social media platforms in recent decades has created unprecedented threats to children from unfiltered exposure to pornography, internet predation, self-harm, suicidal ideation, and other negative influences. Strident public calls for increased policing of online content have been amplified by tragic cases of trauma and loss. In the UK, support for the Online Safety Act has been fueled by organizations such as the Molly Rose Foundation.

The Molly Rose Foundation is named after 14-year-old Molly Russell, who committed suicide following a battle with depression aggravated by online content. Her father, Ian Russell, has been a prominent advocate for imposing stricter safeguards on internet platforms, including the world’s largest social media sites. Following a recent report commissioned by the foundation, Russell has raised alarms that the UK authorities are still falling far short, stating:

Social media platforms strenuously disagree with such claims, but there is no dispute that young people are particularly vulnerable to internet predation, including algorithms, revenge porn, grooming, bullying, and stalking. Yet these are very different from criticizing others for their behaviors, voicing disagreement with immigration or medical...

(Excerpt) Read more at libertynation.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: 1984; tyranny
Pretending the law is about "protecting children" at the same time they let the Pakistani grooming gangs run wild and imprison anyone who talks about them.
1 posted on 08/24/2025 9:59:21 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“Pretending the law is about “protecting children....”

It’s like the 25 children that died at Waco. As Janet Reno said, they did it for the children.


2 posted on 08/24/2025 10:01:54 AM PDT by KamperKen (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
(UK Struggles to Find Free Speech Balance)

UK Struggles to SUPPRESS British Citizens' Free Speech
While Appeasing Invasion by Implementing '1984' Tyranny

(hat tip to another FReeper for images)

'1984' now England 2025

Coming to a country near you should the Democrats get back in power

Tyrannical Globalists Unite!!!


["This Keir Starmer, in my opinion, is evil. IF YOU SPEAK OUT, HE'LL PUT YOU IN PRISON. And we've seen that with LUCY CONNOLLY. He wants people in prison. And lets remind ourselves, this is a man who has spent his life defending wronguns. He doesn't defend people like us, he defends wronguns and he'll put anybody above the best interests of the British people."]



'1984'






3 posted on 08/24/2025 10:07:51 AM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the Days of Lot; They did Eat, They Drank, They Bought, They Sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

What UK is struggling with is the gov’mt trying to continue to impose commie trash crappola — which depends upon censorship.


4 posted on 08/24/2025 10:08:41 AM PDT by bobbo666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bobbo666

Rather than shipping arms to Ukraine, perhaps we need to ship firearms to the UK citizens. You know, defending democracy, and all that.


5 posted on 08/24/2025 10:35:10 AM PDT by Right Brother (I don't really care Margaret.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Right Brother

The last time the American public shipped the Brits weapons for defense, they dumped them in the ocean after they were done.


6 posted on 08/24/2025 10:52:33 AM PDT by Repeat Offender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

You either free speech or you don’t. Restricted speech isn’t free speech.

Stop parsing the word free.


7 posted on 08/24/2025 11:31:39 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Repeal the Patriot Act; Abolish the DHS; reform FBI top to bottom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The UK population believes what their government and media tells them.

They’re sheep with an English accent.


8 posted on 08/24/2025 11:33:56 AM PDT by unclebankster (Globalism is the last refuge of a scoundrel. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Never a regret we battled England and broke away.

“Remember, British people have no 2nd Amendment right to bear arms”——a woman quoted on a past thread.

Currently, British citizens are under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights signed into UK law in 1998 under the Human Rights Act.
Extends the rights of expression Europeans have ... “ However, this right is not absolute and is subject to limitations for reasons such as national security, public safety, the prevention of disorder or crime, and the protection of the rights of others, which can include restrictions on hate speech and defamation.”

Maybe like the woman silently praying near an abortion clinic and the cop knew she was thinking those thoughts and had her arrested and jailed. Won her appeal after a lengthy and expensve court battle.


9 posted on 08/24/2025 1:00:53 PM PDT by frank ballenger (There's a battle outside and it's raging. It'll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Repeat Offender
Yeah well, they did pay for all of it, after all.

Took them about 60 years to do it but they paid the bill.

With interest too.

10 posted on 08/24/2025 2:02:59 PM PDT by jmacusa ( Liberals. Too stupid to be idiots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

Exactly. There is no constitution or a bill of rights in England, at least I’m not aware of one.

Is there a 1st. Amendment in Britain?


11 posted on 08/24/2025 2:04:44 PM PDT by jmacusa ( Liberals. Too stupid to be idiots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa
Nope—Britain doesn’t have a “First Amendment” like the United States does. That’s because the UK doesn’t have a single written constitution. Instead, it operates under a mix of statutes, common law, and conventions that have evolved over centuries.

FeatureUnited States (1st Amendment)United Kingdom
Constitutional GuaranteeYesNo written constitution
Free Speech ProtectionBroad and robustQualified and subject to limitations
Hate Speech LawsProtected unless incitingCriminalized under various statutes
Press FreedomStrong legal shieldMore vulnerable to libel and secrecy laws

12 posted on 08/24/2025 2:11:51 PM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Repeal the Patriot Act; Abolish the DHS; reform FBI top to bottom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: All

God Bless the USA!!!


13 posted on 08/24/2025 2:15:37 PM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Repeal the Patriot Act; Abolish the DHS; reform FBI top to bottom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

Thanks for the info.

I’m aware that Britain has some very tough libel laws, or did at one time.

I remember that trial in the 70’s in the UK, “QB-VII’’.


14 posted on 08/24/2025 2:16:18 PM PDT by jmacusa ( Liberals. Too stupid to be idiots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Who’s gonna protect American children from all the porn on X ??
Search engine the porn word of your choice if you don’t believe me.
Musk is promoting/allowing porn on X bigly.


15 posted on 08/24/2025 2:40:45 PM PDT by AirForceVet1988 ("As the pattern gets more intricate and subtle, being swept along is no longer enough.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AirForceVet1988
Who’s gonna protect American children from all the porn on X ??

So you want government to do the job of parents?

And that way they can treat us all like children?

16 posted on 08/24/2025 2:55:23 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Democrats are the Party of racism, anger, hate and violence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Elon Musk has raised the colors!

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1960230222441193644

I’ll gladly retweet that on X, Mr. Musk, if I’m no longer banned.

For what this is about...

https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/2100069/elon-musk-posts-england-flag


17 posted on 08/26/2025 3:03:58 AM PDT by mewzilla (Swing away, Mr. President, swing away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson