Posted on 08/24/2025 9:59:21 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Online Safety Act draws fire for stifling free expression.
Children are suffering psychological harm from unfiltered social media platforms that expose them to disturbing adult content as well as online predators. The United Kingdom’s initiatives to police the internet to protect children have attracted opposition by those claiming the Online Safety Act (OSA) is a Trojan horse being abused to regulate free speech. Finding the balance is proving to be an ongoing challenge.
Protecting Children Online
The explosion of social media platforms in recent decades has created unprecedented threats to children from unfiltered exposure to pornography, internet predation, self-harm, suicidal ideation, and other negative influences. Strident public calls for increased policing of online content have been amplified by tragic cases of trauma and loss. In the UK, support for the Online Safety Act has been fueled by organizations such as the Molly Rose Foundation.
The Molly Rose Foundation is named after 14-year-old Molly Russell, who committed suicide following a battle with depression aggravated by online content. Her father, Ian Russell, has been a prominent advocate for imposing stricter safeguards on internet platforms, including the world’s largest social media sites. Following a recent report commissioned by the foundation, Russell has raised alarms that the UK authorities are still falling far short, stating:
Social media platforms strenuously disagree with such claims, but there is no dispute that young people are particularly vulnerable to internet predation, including algorithms, revenge porn, grooming, bullying, and stalking. Yet these are very different from criticizing others for their behaviors, voicing disagreement with immigration or medical...
(Excerpt) Read more at libertynation.com ...
“Pretending the law is about “protecting children....”
It’s like the 25 children that died at Waco. As Janet Reno said, they did it for the children.





What UK is struggling with is the gov’mt trying to continue to impose commie trash crappola — which depends upon censorship.
Rather than shipping arms to Ukraine, perhaps we need to ship firearms to the UK citizens. You know, defending democracy, and all that.
The last time the American public shipped the Brits weapons for defense, they dumped them in the ocean after they were done.
You either free speech or you don’t. Restricted speech isn’t free speech.
Stop parsing the word free.
The UK population believes what their government and media tells them.
They’re sheep with an English accent.
Never a regret we battled England and broke away.
“Remember, British people have no 2nd Amendment right to bear arms”——a woman quoted on a past thread.
Currently, British citizens are under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights signed into UK law in 1998 under the Human Rights Act.
Extends the rights of expression Europeans have ... “ However, this right is not absolute and is subject to limitations for reasons such as national security, public safety, the prevention of disorder or crime, and the protection of the rights of others, which can include restrictions on hate speech and defamation.”
Maybe like the woman silently praying near an abortion clinic and the cop knew she was thinking those thoughts and had her arrested and jailed. Won her appeal after a lengthy and expensve court battle.
Took them about 60 years to do it but they paid the bill.
With interest too.
Exactly. There is no constitution or a bill of rights in England, at least I’m not aware of one.
Is there a 1st. Amendment in Britain?
| Feature | United States (1st Amendment) | United Kingdom |
|---|---|---|
| Constitutional Guarantee | Yes | No written constitution |
| Free Speech Protection | Broad and robust | Qualified and subject to limitations |
| Hate Speech Laws | Protected unless inciting | Criminalized under various statutes |
| Press Freedom | Strong legal shield | More vulnerable to libel and secrecy laws |
Thanks for the info.
I’m aware that Britain has some very tough libel laws, or did at one time.
I remember that trial in the 70’s in the UK, “QB-VII’’.
Who’s gonna protect American children from all the porn on X ??
Search engine the porn word of your choice if you don’t believe me.
Musk is promoting/allowing porn on X bigly.
So you want government to do the job of parents?
And that way they can treat us all like children?
Elon Musk has raised the colors!
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1960230222441193644
I’ll gladly retweet that on X, Mr. Musk, if I’m no longer banned.
For what this is about...
https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/2100069/elon-musk-posts-england-flag
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.