Skip to comments.
Trump Says Americans Could Get Dividends From Tariff Revenues
Epoch Times ^
| 08/02/2025
| Aldgra Fredly
Posted on 08/04/2025 8:35:38 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
To: SeekAndFind
I’d rather we pay down the debt as soon as we can.
To: SeekAndFind
Heck, foreign tears and teeth gnashing are reward enough.
3
posted on
08/04/2025 8:46:50 PM PDT
by
Governor Dinwiddie
( O give thanks unto the Lord, for He is gracious, and his mercy endures forever. β Psalm 106)
To: SeekAndFind
To: SeekAndFind
I’d rather pay down the debt.
I don’t want it going to welfare recipients that could work but don’t. Why give them money while we’re still going to have to pay off the debt? They don’t contribute so don’t give them more for nothing.
5
posted on
08/04/2025 8:53:03 PM PDT
by
boycott
To: SeekAndFind
I would rather have the money. The debt will never be paid down. My paltry dividend would be but a grain of sand compared to all the beaches in the world. Most of our taxation has been pure theft. This is just a micro restitution.
6
posted on
08/04/2025 8:54:40 PM PDT
by
Right Brother
(I don't really care Margaret.)
To: SeekAndFind
Pay down the debt. Get down to $30T before election ‘28.
7
posted on
08/04/2025 9:44:18 PM PDT
by
lurk
(u)
To: SeekAndFind
Oh good, more income redistribution. Geez it’s coming from both sides now.
8
posted on
08/04/2025 9:46:34 PM PDT
by
fluffy
To: SeekAndFind
Now this would be a sight to behold! Guess if you are going to dream, dream big..
To: fluffy
Indeed. As we can see, both sides want socialism.
To: Tired of Taxes
Coffee prices nearly doubling, isnt that tariff mostly
To: SeekAndFind
12
posted on
08/05/2025 12:20:44 AM PDT
by
Varsity Flight
( "War by π the prophesies set before you." ) I Timothy 1:18. Nazarite warriors. 10.5.6.5 These Days)
To: SeekAndFind
13
posted on
08/05/2025 2:15:54 AM PDT
by
Bobbyvotes
(TERM LIMITS is the ONLY WAY to get rid of corrupt career politicians. )
To: boycott
Tariff dividend should be a percent of federal income tax paid. Subject to a maximum limit based on middle class cut off point.
14
posted on
08/05/2025 2:20:37 AM PDT
by
Bobbyvotes
(TERM LIMITS is the ONLY WAY to get rid of corrupt career politicians. )
To: SeekAndFind
You don’t have to take it.
15
posted on
08/05/2025 2:38:29 AM PDT
by
roving
To: SeekAndFind
Totally agree with you. There will be plenty of fraud with any give back plans.
16
posted on
08/05/2025 2:39:48 AM PDT
by
brooklin
To: SeekAndFind
Pay down the debt... plus - I really don’t wish to add to my taxable income. Next thing you know I’m paying penalties for not withholding enough and the guvmints suggestion is that I pay quarterly... Itβs bad enough with the work that goes into my preps and submission already. Repeating it 4x per year would totally suck.
A straight 15% flat tax would preferable than the burden of paperwork and time I already invest.
17
posted on
08/05/2025 2:54:23 AM PDT
by
Clutch Martin
("The dawn cracks hard like a bull whip and it ain't taking no lip from the night before" Tom Waits)
To: SeekAndFind
Pay down the debt and eliminate federal income tax.
18
posted on
08/05/2025 4:18:29 AM PDT
by
maddog55
(The only thing systemic in America is the left's hatred of it!)
To: SeekAndFind
Use the tariff income to shore up SS βtrust fundβ. Everyone would be for that.
19
posted on
08/05/2025 4:31:54 AM PDT
by
central_va
(The I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
To: SeekAndFind
Distributing it will likely result in more incremental tax revenues that the interest savings from paying down the debt.
Plus a distribution by the Repubicans will help reinforce the popularity of the Republicans even as it helps the economy.
Here's an economic analysis by chatgpt:
What Happens If Trump Distributes $1 Trillion in Tariff Revenue?
Letβs assume Trump has $1 trillion in excess tariff revenue. He can:
- A) Pay down the national debt
- B) Distribute it to Americans, who will then either:
- C) Spend it
- D) Save it
- E) Invest it
Each of these options has downstream effects on federal and state/local government revenues through income taxes, sales taxes, capital gains taxes, and corporate taxes. Letβs analyze each scenario.
Key Assumptions
- Marginal federal income tax rate: 15β20%
- Average state income tax: 5% (some states = 0%)
- Sales tax: 6β8%
- Multiplier effect: 1.2β1.5x on spending
- Capital gains tax: 15% federal, 5% state
- Corporate tax rate: 21% federal
A) Pay Down the National Debt
This option doesn't directly stimulate the economy, but it reduces federal interest expenses.
- Average interest on national debt: ~4.5%
- Annual savings = $1T Γ 4.5% = $45 billion/year
β
Benefit: Guaranteed, recurring savings
β Downside: No direct boost to jobs, GDP, or taxes
B) Distribute $1 Trillion to Americans
Assume people:
- Spend 70% β $700B
- Save 15% β $150B
- Invest 15% β $150B
1. Spending ($700B)
- Corporate profit margin (~10β15%) Γ 21% corporate tax β $15β25B
- Income taxes on wages (~15%) β $105B
- Sales tax (7%) β $49B
- State income tax (~5% on 50%) β $17.5B
Total from Spending:
Federal: $120β130B
State/Local: $65β70B
2. Saving ($150B)
- 2% average interest = $3B earned
- 15% federal tax on interest β $0.45B
- 5% state tax β $0.15B
Total from Saving:
Federal: $0.5B
State/Local: $0.15B
3. Investing ($150B)
- 10% capital gains = $15B
- 15% federal CGT = $2.25B
- 5% state CGT = $0.75B
Total from Investing:
Federal: $2.25B
State/Local: $0.75B
Summary: Direct Distribution Tax Revenue
Behavior | Federal Revenue | State/Local Revenue |
---|
Spending ($700B) | ~$125B | ~$65B |
Saving ($150B) | ~$0.5B | ~$0.15B |
Investing ($150B) | ~$2.25B | ~$0.75B |
Total | ~$128B | ~$66B |
---|
Multiplier Effect: +$210B in GDP
If we assume a multiplier of 1.3 on spending, the $700B yields $910B in total GDP. Thatβs a $210B boost, taxed again:
- 15% federal tax = $31.5B
- 5% state/local tax = $10.5B
Adjusted Totals (with Multiplier)
Level of Government | Original Revenue | From Multiplier | Total |
---|
Federal | $128B | $31.5B | $159.5B |
State/Local | $66B | $10.5B | $76.5B |
Final Comparison
Scenario | Federal Benefit | State/Local Benefit | Timing |
---|
Pay Down Debt | $45B/year (interest savings) | $0 | Ongoing |
Distribute to Public | $160B (first year) | $76.5B (first year) | Front-loaded |
Conclusion
- Debt reduction yields a predictable $45B/year in savings.
- Direct distribution stimulates the economy and could return ~$235B in federal + state/local revenue in year one.
- Future returns depend on investment growth, economic stability, and policy choices.
20
posted on
08/05/2025 4:38:01 AM PDT
by
DannyTN
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson