Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jury orders Tesla to pay more than $200 million in Autopilot crash case
Channel 3000 News/AP ^ | August 2, 2025 | AP Bitter LOSERS

Posted on 08/02/2025 6:23:50 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin

A Miami jury decided that Elon Musk’s car company Tesla was partly responsible for a deadly crash in Florida involving its Autopilot driver assist technology and must pay the victims more than $200 million in punitive damages.

The federal jury held that Tesla bore significant responsibility because its technology failed and that not all the blame can be put on a reckless driver, even one who admitted he was distracted by his cell phone before hitting a young couple out gazing at the stars. The decision comes as Musk seeks to convince Americans his cars are safe enough to drive on their own as he plans to roll out a driverless taxi service in several cities in the coming months.

The decision ends a four-year long case remarkable not just in its outcome but that it even made it to trial. Many similar cases against Tesla have been dismissed and, when that didn't happen, settled by the company to avoid the spotlight of a trial.

“This will open the floodgates,” said Miguel Custodio, a car crash lawyer not involved in the Tesla case. “It will embolden a lot of people to come to court.”

The case also included startling charges by lawyers for the family of the deceased, 22-year-old, Naibel Benavides Leon, and for her injured boyfriend, Dillon Angulo. They claimed Tesla either hid or lost key evidence, including data and video recorded seconds before the accident.

(Excerpt) Read more at channel3000.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: automotive; crash; florida; jury; lawsuit; musk; tesla
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
"In addition to the punitive award, the jury said Tesla must also pay $49 million in compensatory damages, bringing the total borne by the company to $249 million.

'It's a big number that will send shockwaves to others in the industry,' said financial analyst Dan Ives of Wedbush Securities. 'It's not a good day for Tesla.'

Tesla said it will appeal."

1 posted on 08/02/2025 6:23:50 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Nobody’s life is worth $200 million. Not even mine!


2 posted on 08/02/2025 6:26:01 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Import The Third World,Become The Third World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Anti-Elon Musk animus at work in a Democrat City.


3 posted on 08/02/2025 6:34:43 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
Remember in these last decades when various “geo-location” self-driving companies including Google tried to get waivers of liability from various governments at both state and national levels?

Rather like the limited liability lobbying of the pharmaceuticals and more....

"Safe and effective" Waymo (Google) and beyond....

4 posted on 08/02/2025 6:34:48 AM PDT by Worldtraveler once upon a time (Degrow government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Yup, its why attorneys make sure the juries on these trials are composed of the most gullible people


5 posted on 08/02/2025 6:35:35 AM PDT by tlozo (“We get a lot of bullshit thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth,” Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tlozo

The award is ridiculous. This needs to be stopped.


6 posted on 08/02/2025 6:41:48 AM PDT by ActresponsiblyinVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Idiots. This isn’t just an “anti-Tesla” ruling, although clearly it is.

Other than the outrageous penalty, it’s a red flag to EVERY automaker regarding ADAS features that save lives. If this is how the courts are going to rule, the ‘road to reduce deaths’ via ADAS systems will come to a complete halt. Every automaker is adding such systems, while simultaneously, States are cracking down with smartphone usage laws.

If they’re admitting that the driver was distracted with a cellphone, Tesla must win on appeal.


7 posted on 08/02/2025 6:43:02 AM PDT by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

I’ve always wished that they made the juries pay what they award to people. Gotta get these damn ‘AWARDS’ under control. $249 million! Get outta town.


8 posted on 08/02/2025 6:43:47 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer ("Kamala Harris would have been the next Abraham Lincoln". - Jeff "Dumber" Daniels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

lawsuits like this were inevitable for any form of “self-driving” car, regardless of who made it, and eventually will kill the whole nonsense of “self-driving” cars ...


9 posted on 08/02/2025 6:51:56 AM PDT by catnipman ((A Vote For The Lesser Of Two Evils Still Counts As A Vote For Evil))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlozo
the juries on these trials are composed of the most gullible envious, resentful people
10 posted on 08/02/2025 6:52:42 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
Driverless cars will vastly improve safety, but the technology might have to be disabled in certain areas due to litigation risk. Of course, the very same lawyers can sue Tesla for not using its driverless technology, knowing that the technology improves safety.
11 posted on 08/02/2025 7:02:25 AM PDT by UnwashedPeasant (The pandemic we suffer from is not COVID. It is Marxist Democrat Leftism. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

“ Nobody’s life is worth $200 million. Not even mine!”
************************************************

True but the call of OTHER-PEOPLE’S-MONEY is irresistible to many. It’s FREE, don’t cha know.


12 posted on 08/02/2025 7:35:43 AM PDT by House Atreides (I’m now ULTRA-MAGA-PRO-MAX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Anybody that uses autopilot has no need for a car hire a ride everyone else is safer.

What people do when autopilot is on knit darn socks cell phone games text lazy has it’s limits.


13 posted on 08/02/2025 7:43:24 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
Tesla said it will appeal.

Tesla's usual strategy is to negotiate an out-of-court settlement with a keep-your-mouth-shut clause, and the whole thing will be swept under the floormat.

14 posted on 08/02/2025 7:53:18 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (Kamala defines herself in just 4 words..."Nothing comes to mind.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

The damages are clearly excessive. Punitive damages should be banned as an attempt to levy fines without the procedural protections afforded in criminal cases.


15 posted on 08/02/2025 7:59:19 AM PDT by Socon-Econ (adi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

First of all, nobody is worth that much.

Second, maybe Tesla should give up on the idea of self-driving cars. It doesn’t seem to be working out well all the time. Risk being the product of probability and consequence, the risk does not appear worth the trouble.


16 posted on 08/02/2025 8:33:25 AM PDT by Sequoyah101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: catnipman

Exactly. The liability issue has always looked large to me. Juries will sock it way harder to a big company than on Mr Smith who hit the gas instead of the brake.

Who goes to prison for reckless driving? The software engineers? The CEOs?


17 posted on 08/02/2025 8:35:18 AM PDT by Persevero (You cannot comply your way out of tyranny. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Good!


18 posted on 08/02/2025 8:41:28 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: catnipman

“lawsuits like this were inevitable for any form of “self-driving” car, regardless of who made it, and eventually will kill the whole nonsense of “self-driving” cars ...”

I’m sure if you would have been around when indoor plumbing was invented you would have said “I’m not going to crap inside my own home!”. Self driving car technology has the potential to save many thousands of lives. This outrageous award is punishing a car company for helping to develop that technology. Lawyers kill more people than self driving cars.


19 posted on 08/02/2025 8:50:08 AM PDT by willk (Local news media. Just as big an enemy to this country as national media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Oh goody. A human being is nothing but a monetary asset. God is impressed.


20 posted on 08/02/2025 8:54:30 AM PDT by Sirius Lee ("Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson