Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 07/22/2025 3:02:06 AM PDT by CharlesOConnell
EU Elite to Stage 'Spectacular' False Flag, Send Youth to DIE on the Front: Alex Krainer
Krainer speculates, on the basis that, in Britain, a nation with some of the greatest number of closed-circuit cameras of any in the world, all the cameras are now turned off—that a false-flag attack is planned that will afford Britain the pretext for supplying Ukraine with a nuclear bomb.
The notion advanced by Krainer—that the United Kingdom, a nation saturated with some of the densest surveillance infrastructure in the Western world, would coincidentally disable or deactivate its CCTV network—can only be understood as a glaring signal that something deeply sinister is underway. We’ve seen this pattern too many times to ignore it: cameras “malfunction” just when intelligence agencies or their allied operatives are preparing to stage an operation designed to manipulate public opinion or provide justification for a dramatic escalation.
The precedent is undeniable. Consider 7/7 in London: the supposed suicide bombers conveniently appeared in grainy footage, but with key camera feeds mysteriously out of service at crucial moments.
The 7/7 attacks, officially known as the London bombings of July 7, 2005, were presented to the public as an act of Islamist terrorism, in which four British Muslims allegedly detonated suicide bombs on three London Underground trains and a bus, killing 52 civilians and injuring over 700. But when examined with any degree of scrutiny, the official narrative collapses under the weight of its own absurdities. In reality, the evidence overwhelmingly suggests this was a false-flag operation, carefully orchestrated by elements within British intelligence, likely in coordination with allied Western agencies, for the purpose of advancing geopolitical aims and tightening domestic control.
Drills Mirroring the Attacks
The most damning piece of evidence is the simultaneous terror drill being conducted on the very same day. Peter Power, a former Scotland Yard official and managing director of Visor Consultants, publicly stated that his firm had been running a crisis exercise that morning that involved bombs going off at precisely the same locations and times as the real explosions. Power himself admitted the “coincidence” on live television, and yet the media never questioned the implications.
Nonexistent Surveillance Footage
London has more CCTV cameras per capita than nearly any city on Earth. Yet, we are told that the only image of the four alleged bombers together was a single still frame—conspicuously low quality—at Luton Station, supposedly en route to the capital. No footage has ever been released from the actual Underground stations or the bus that exploded. This is a critical omission.
In an operation that supposedly involved four suicide bombers boarding trains and buses filled with passengers, not a single piece of footage has been made public to corroborate this story. The only explanation is that such footage does not support the official narrative and has therefore been suppressed.
The Strange Case of the Bus
One of the bombs exploded on a No. 30 double-decker bus in Tavistock Square, directly outside the British Medical Association and just around the corner from Tavistock Institute, a known center of psychological operations research. The explosion on the bus is also suspicious in its timing and location—it was diverted from its usual route, apparently due to the chaos from the earlier train bombings.
What’s more, photos from the scene show the top of the bus completely blown off, while the lower deck is largely intact—not the typical damage pattern from an internal suicide bomb. Eyewitnesses also reported a sudden flash and explosion from under the floorboards, not from a passenger’s backpack.
No Independent Verification of the Bombers' Deaths
The four alleged perpetrators—Mohammed Sidique Khan, Shehzad Tanweer, Germaine Lindsay, and Hasib Hussain—were never put on trial, obviously, since they were declared to be suicide bombers. But the coroner’s inquest into the deaths never conclusively verified the identities of the bodies through open evidence.
Moreover, Khan and Tanweer were known to MI5, had traveled to Pakistan under surveillance, and had even been flagged in earlier terror investigations—yet we are told they simply slipped through the cracks. More likely, these young men were manipulated, possibly as patsies, brought in under the guise of participating in a drill, only to be murdered and blamed posthumously.
Political Utility
At the time, Tony Blair’s government was under increasing pressure over the war in Iraq, which had become a quagmire. Public opinion was turning sharply against continued military involvement and the erosion of civil liberties under the pretext of "anti-terrorism." The 7/7 attacks instantly reversed the political climate. Within days, draconian new anti-terror legislation was introduced. Foreign policy criticism dried up. The public was reminded that Britain, too, was “under threat.”
The perpetrators, we are told, were "homegrown" jihadists. Yet this perfectly served the political need to justify domestic surveillance, Muslim community infiltration, and the permanent expansion of the security state.
7/7 was not the spontaneous act of four disaffected radicals. It was a carefully crafted state-sponsored psychological operation, likely orchestrated by British intelligence and its transatlantic allies. It served the geopolitical needs of the Anglo-American empire, reinforced public fear, and provided the pretext for ongoing war abroad and authoritarianism at home.
The fact that nearly two decades later, key surveillance footage, forensic reports, and drill details remain classified is not the behavior of a state seeking truth—it is the signature of a cover-up.
The 7/7 bombings were not a failure of intelligence. They were the product of intelligence.
Now Alex Krainer points to what can only be called the next logical step in the West’s self-destructive proxy war against Russia: a false-flag event, likely devastating in scale, to finally “justify” crossing the ultimate red line—nuclear weapons. Britain’s military and intelligence establishments are among the most historically aggressive in the world, with a long legacy of deception, ranging from the Suez Crisis to Iraq’s WMD hoax. It is not at all implausible that they would stage or facilitate a catastrophic incident on home soil in order to shift public opinion and unlock a new, far more dangerous phase of the Ukraine conflict.
In fact, this strategy of provocation fits neatly into NATO’s long-standing playbook. The Western project in Ukraine has already failed on its own merits—corruption, incompetence, and demoralization plague the Kiev regime. Western publics are increasingly fatigued, economic damage is mounting, and dissent is growing even within the elite. What better way to reignite momentum than a nuclear “provocation”—blamed, of course, on Russia or one of its proxies—and use that to justify crossing a threshold that has so far remained taboo?
The alleged goal of “providing Ukraine with a nuclear bomb” may strike some as implausible, but we must recall that the West’s commitment to escalation has already surpassed every prior red line: the delivery of long-range missile systems, tank columns, F-16s, and intelligence targeting Russian generals. From this perspective, nuclear proliferation is not only the logical next step—it is an inevitability.
So the answer to the question of how likely such an event is? It is not only likely—it is probable. The only real uncertainty is what form the pretext will take, and how many lives will be sacrificed to create the necessary theater. When cameras go off in the most surveilled country on Earth, we are not witnessing coincidence—we are being warned, in the language of power, that a new phase is about to begin.
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BzBZNtrnG5k
The topic of George Galloway’s documentary Killing Kelly is the highly suspicious death of Dr. David Kelly, the British weapons expert who exposed the fraudulent basis for the UK’s entry into the Iraq War. Galloway presents a detailed, forensic takedown of the official narrative, arguing that Dr. Kelly did not commit suicide, as the government claimed, but was in fact assassinated to prevent further disclosures about the lies underpinning the 2003 invasion of Iraq.
Background: Who Was Dr. David Kelly?
Dr. Kelly was a senior biological weapons inspector and expert who had worked with both the UN and British intelligence. In 2003, he became the unnamed source for a BBC report which revealed that Tony Blair’s government had “sexed up” the infamous Iraq dossier, exaggerating Saddam Hussein’s alleged WMD capabilities to justify war. In particular, Kelly challenged the now-notorious claim that Iraq could deploy chemical weapons within “45 minutes,” a claim that was later shown to be completely fabricated.
When Kelly was outed as the BBC's source, he was dragged before a parliamentary committee, interrogated aggressively, and publicly humiliated. Days later, he was found dead in the woods, supposedly having cut his wrist with a blunt gardening knife and overdosed on painkillers.
Why "Killing Kelly" Matters
Galloway’s documentary reopens the case with the seriousness it deserves, showing that the official story of suicide was riddled with inconsistencies, fabrications, and deliberate obfuscations:
Medical evidence presented in the Hutton Inquiry (which replaced a proper coroner’s inquest) was incomplete and contradicted by paramedics and doctors, who insisted the wound was insufficient to cause death and that there was almost no blood at the scene.
The Hutton Inquiry, widely regarded as a whitewash, was conducted in secret, and its findings were sealed for 70 years, an absurd overreach for what was supposedly a routine suicide.
Kelly had told friends he feared for his life, that he would be “found dead in the woods,” and that “dark actors” were playing games.
He was allegedly planning to go public with even more damning revelations, possibly about the absence of actual WMDs in Iraq or the intelligence services’ manipulation of data.
A Political Assassination, Covered Up
The true thesis of Killing Kelly is that David Kelly was murdered by the state—most likely by British intelligence, possibly with the cooperation of allied agencies—and that the entire UK political establishment, including the Blair government and its media enablers, participated in the cover-up.
The documentary does not simply imply this—it states it outright, offering evidence, interviews, and a timeline that show Kelly's death was far too convenient for those in power to be accidental. It frames his death as the price of telling the truth in a system built on lies, war, and impunity.
“Killing Kelly” is not just about one man’s suspicious death—it is about the rotting foundation of the British state, and the way intelligence agencies, politicians, and the media conspire to destroy those who threaten to reveal the truth. In resurrecting David Kelly’s case, Galloway is indicting the entire machinery of deception that drove the Iraq War and crushed its most honest whistleblower.
It is literally absurd to believe that ALL CC cameras in a nation the size of GB could be turned off at one time. You think they are all part of a single network with a single point of failure? I haven’t done big network risk management in a few years….but even back in the Y2K days that would be absurd.
There is no harder news than A Youtube video.
“Believe all Youtube videos.” Anyone sophisticated enough to have a webcam and a computer must be a well-respected genius with top-secret security clearance.
You’ll acknowledge this is BS after 48hrs and nothing happens.
“What’s more, photos from the scene show the top of the bus completely blown off, while the lower deck is largely intact—not the typical damage pattern from an internal suicide bomb”
I didn’t know there was a “typical damage pattern” for suicide bombs. All bombs are equal, but some bombs are more equal than others.
100% guarantee this is not true.
Just like every conspiracy where it is supposed to be so super-duper-secret, yet is being openly discussed on Internet forums.
In other news, the world ended in the ‘90s, and the National Guard that had (allegedly) gathered in DC to stop the 2020 inauguration and imprison Pelosi and Biden in Guantanamo should be rotating out now. Especially since the shootouts that were happening in Berlin between Delta Force and the CIA still have reverberations to this date.
(Unfortunately, apart from the one of the world ending in the ‘90s, all the other stuff was discussed here on FR. Unfortunately).
But hey, maybe this time it’s true. The cameras will be turned off, a false flag attack will happen, and that will be used as a pretext to give Ukraine a nuclear weapon,
Flying saucers will also be landing in Denmark tomorrow, and Xi from China paid me good money to come here and discredit the false flag attack so that more people don’t believe it. The Ethereum hit my account in the morning.
Just like Bush took down the twin towers.
Please take your meds.
CC
“”“Believe all Youtube videos.” Anyone sophisticated enough to have a webcam and a computer must be a well-respected genius with top-secret security clearance.””
Lmao! I love sarcasm.
Don’t know about the cameras and false flags, but giving Ukraine a nuke or two would fit the UK’s policy of trying everything they can to try to prevent ‘Putin’ from taking Kiev. And from their perspective, what’s the downside? Some nukes go off in Moscow (they hope) or at least somewhere in Russia, and Kiev gets vaporized. Probably not much radioactive fallout in the UK, and their population replacement program can continue, unabated. But the UPSIDE is what counts - ‘Putin’ knows that Ukraine has nukes and surrenders (LOL).
I get all my important news from Youtube - NOT.....
The many other absurdities apart, this fantasy narrative ignores the inconvenient fact that the majority of CCTV cameras in Britain are privately owned, protecting the security of private property, and are not linked.
If they are hooked to an internet router then they are all absolutely linked together, both private and commercial and the government does has access to all of them in real time. It is already the same here in this country.
“all the cameras are now turned off”
Is there any actual evidence that this is true?
There is quite a lot of evidence that the intelligence [sic] agencies as well as the moslim community in London knew in advance that something was going to happen on 7/7. But to pretend that it was anything other than four moslim suicide bombers that carried out the deed is complete and utter lunacy; this rubbish it should not be promoted on FR and the thread should be deleted.
PS My own security cameras on both my home property and my business premises are all working just fine right now.
I had totally forgotten about the FR squad who pushed the MIHOP and LIHOP conspiracies. Goodness, how time flies. I don’t think MIHOP (made it happen on purpose) and LIHOP (let it happen on purpose) have been written on FR in 15 years!
Just because we are on the right side doesn’t mean there are no silly people here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.