How in the ever lovin he*l can she be sentenced to 20 years for trafficking when everyone involved in the investigation says there is no list and no one was trafficked?
My common sense thinking says something doesn’t add up..
Because the girls were just Epstein’s abuse. He did not farm them out to others. There was no list of clients. There were no clients.
"Trafficked" can mean merely "transported."
You didn't even read the article, did you? I mean, the article clearly points out that Maxwell was convicted for trafficking girls, so to say "no one was trafficked" is just ludicrous.
My common sense thinking says something doesn’t add up.
Either you didn't read the article, or you lack common sense, because the answer is staring you right in the face.
Because, as the article says, everything sexually illegal was excursively for Epstein. The DOJ report does not mention any “clients”. It talks about Maxwell and other possible employees, BUT NO CLIENTS.
So, the question is: Is there a client list, or was this juicy gossip that got repeated over and over until it became a believed fact, even though such a list never existed?
Now there is an Epstein list, which is what some people may be referring to. Those are names found in court documents. That list includes:
Prince Andrew
Bill Clinton
Donald Trump
Former New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson
Alan Dershowitz
Michael Jackson
David Copperfield
Stephen Hawking
Jean-Luc Brunel
Leslie Wexner
Kevin Spacey
Naomi Campbell
Cate Blanchett
That list is probably what Bondi was referring to at one time, or the other yo yo’s that said they supposedly saw a “list”. Some of these people are media whores who just cannot get enough attention and will overstate what isn’t a fact just to get that attention. (a hint, one has blonde hair)
None of those court documents indicate any of the above named were involved in any illegal activities. It merrely means that at one time or another their names became associated with Epstein. It’s important to reiterate that simply appearing in these documents does not mean the individual participated in Epstein’s criminal activities.
THESE PEOPLE CANNOT BE GUILTY BY ASSOCIATION. The only thing making these people guilty is the relentless news coverage implying they are.
“How in the ever lovin he*l can she be sentenced to 20 years for trafficking when everyone involved in the investigation says there is no list and no one was trafficked?
My common sense thinking says something doesn’t add up..”
What doesn’t add up is your ignorance on what she was sentenced on.
There were phone numbers of influential people in his phone list.
There just wasn’t some specially compiled list of people all sorted into “services provided” and itemized details or whatever it is people were thinking he had, at least jot in a nice tidy package that could be handed out like a flyer.
Instead there was a rat’s nest of stuff requiring investigators to sort through a lot of junk to find out who was around when the known girls were abused and if there was any evidence involving them actually knowing what was going on when it did.
“How in the ever lovin he*l can she be sentenced to 20 years for trafficking when everyone involved in the investigation says there is no list and no one was trafficked?
My common sense thinking says something doesn’t add up..”
____________________________________________________________
Why would you think anyone involved in human trafficking would keep a written list? It’s just like any other crime where the fewer items of documentation of the crime is better for the criminals involved at all levels.