Posted on 07/15/2025 4:29:11 PM PDT by DeweyCA
Critical Theory is a form of brainwashing where people "deconstruct" reality to fit their wishes. It actually is satanic, since Satan is the "father of lies."
There is a tiny element of truth in what they say, in that our interpretation of reality is somewhat affected by our background and experiences. However, the Critical Theorists take this way out of perspective and say that reality is then changed. And of course, the Left redefines words such as "reality." So that what is your reality is not the same as their reality. Perception is redefined as reality. Only an intellectual (or a stupid Leftist) would be stupid enough to believe something like this. This is the nonsense that is being taught in high schools and colleges.
“Critical Theory is a form of brainwashing where people “deconstruct” reality to fit their wishes. It actually is satanic, since Satan is the “father of lies.””
Source?
Pegged by Monty Python in the Life of Brian.
John 8:44
Normally I’d expect the Californian to be asking the Texan for Biblical references
I don’t think the Bible discusses marxism.
It does discuss lies—the most obvious lead in.
If Marxism is built of a tissue of lies, arguing that it is Satanic makes sense.
Sex. The word you are looking for is sex.
S.
E.
X.
The concept of "gender" outside of grammar is a delusion promoted by child sexual mutilator, total pervert and complete psychopath may he burn in hell, John Money.
Using his terminology is like promoting Cooking with Dahmer.
In your very article opposing it you are actually promoting it.
Just stop it.
And if the word sex make you blush or giggle like a twelve year old just grow the heck up.
I remember seeing a monograph published around 1957 that examined the effects of overly high population density to behavior in mice. As the population became more dense, the mice would change behavior. Specifically, violence and sexual orientation. The paper further estimated that humans would start to exhibit similar changes when the population density broke the 100 person per acre barrier.
‘Critical Theory is a form of brainwashing where people “deconstruct” reality to fit their wishes. It actually is satanic, since Satan is the “father of lies.”’
That’s right.
I recall when “queer” meant odd or unusual—around the same time “gay” meant happy and/or lighthearted and “pride” meant satisfaction with one’s own attributes or accomplishments.
Politically, the gender-bender movement is the latest step-up in the war on convention.
Individually, queer and gender acting-out are nothing more than rebellion against God.
Is it OK to call them queers again, or not.
This is still one of those things they can call themselves, but no one else can, isn’t it.
Yes it IS an assault on REALITY. A is A. It cannot be anything else. Denial of A is mental illness.
Good article. Thanks for posting.
Faggots in a song might not go over too well these days…
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wTP2RUD_cL0&pp=0gcJCfwAo7VqN5tD
He was a Tall and Fat customer for years!
Initially, psychoanalysis viewed homosexuality as an abnormal developmental arrest or neurosis, though Sigmund Freud himself did not consider it a mental illness. Later, psychoanalytic thought began to shift towards viewing homosexuality as a normal variant of human sexuality, especially after the American Psychiatric Association removed it from the DSM.
Early Psychoanalytic Views:
Freud’s Perspective:
While Freud acknowledged homosexuality as a variation in sexual development, he also believed it was not an illness, vice, or degradation. He suggested it stemmed from arrested sexual development and did not advocate for its treatment or stigmatization.
Neofreudian Views:
Many later psychoanalysts, especially in the US, viewed homosexuality as a neurosis requiring treatment, often influenced by theories of Oedipal complex resolution and gender identity formation.
Conversion Therapy:
Some analysts even attempted “conversion therapies” to change homosexual individuals’ sexual orientation, reflecting the belief that it was a pathological condition.
Shifting Perspectives:
Influence of Activism:
The LGBTQ+ rights movement, particularly the debate surrounding the inclusion of homosexuality in the DSM, significantly challenged the psychoanalytic view.
Modern Psychoanalysis:
Many modern psychoanalysts now recognize homosexuality as a normal variation of human sexuality and emphasize understanding it within the context of individual development and psychosocial factors.
Emphasis on Individual Experience:
Current approaches focus on understanding the individual’s experience of their sexuality, including its development, and the impact of social and cultural factors, rather than pathologizing it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.