Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrat Ro Khanna Demands Vote To Release Full Jeffrey Epstein Files
Newsweek ^

Posted on 07/13/2025 7:36:12 AM PDT by USA-FRANCE

Representative Ro Khanna (D‑CA) has announced plans to force a vote in the House of Representatives demanding the full, unredacted release of all documents related to disgraced financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. In a post on X, formerly Twitter, Khanna said he will introduce an amendment this week that would require the House Speaker to bring the measure to a roll-call vote, putting every member of Congress on the record.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsweek.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; US: California
KEYWORDS: 2026wipeout; california; epsteindelusion; epsteindistraction; epsteinobsession; francefrog; israelownstrump; newsweak; newsweek; rokhanna; wheresepsteinfiles; whereszotfortrolls; zog
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: gibsonguy

The docs almost certainly started going back to when Robert Mueller ran the FBI. Then there was Comey and then Chris Wray, and a few interims. What could be wrong?


21 posted on 07/13/2025 9:39:30 AM PDT by jjotto ("...saith the LORD: yet I loved Jacob, And I hated Esau...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: USA-FRANCE

“Democrat Ro Khanna Demands Vote To Release Full Jeffrey Epstein Files”

May it be

May it be so!


22 posted on 07/13/2025 9:45:11 AM PDT by Sunsong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn; All

Bill O’Reilly claims that’s what Trump told him in a face-to-face meeting. I saw the link on the MSN site. Do an internet search “Bill O’Reilly Epstein”. I did that and found it.

That brings to mind several questions!
1. Why did Trump confide in O’Reilly or is that a lie?
2. If it was said with confidentiality in mind why did O’Reilly betray a confidence?
3. Does this say there really is a “list”? Dershowitz’s statements implie something like a “list” exists.
4. Assuming a “list” exists, who’s so important that’s on it that all these machinations are necessary?
5. Does this mean Trump is on the “list”?
6. Is this all a big information operation? If so to what end is unclear!

Remember being on the “list” could be perfectly innocent like being in Epstein’s rolodex. Rolodex has a mixture of “sex trade clients “ and just important people Epstein wished to hobknob with. It doesn’t matter if you’re on there you’re damaged you’re painted with the same brush as the sex trade clients. Probably should get it out now and work damage control!

Up until this O’Reilly claim I was perfectly willing to view the “list” as more myth then fact even with Dershowitz’s statements. It still may be mostly myth. I think it’s best to get it out and get it settled. Letting it continue to simmer & smoke damages what needs to get done!


23 posted on 07/13/2025 10:12:46 AM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: USA-FRANCE

Yes it will be interesting to see how they vote assuming it ever gets to the floor which I doubt.


24 posted on 07/13/2025 10:24:22 AM PDT by jimwatx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn

I have no list but suspect GOP and Dem members are on some list that someone has..


25 posted on 07/13/2025 10:33:34 AM PDT by dpetty121263
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: USA-FRANCE

Republicans in Congress don’t want to vote on this as they are afraid of crossing Trump.


26 posted on 07/13/2025 10:39:56 AM PDT by Kevin C
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USA-FRANCE

LOL. Democrats finally care about the Epstein files.


27 posted on 07/13/2025 10:42:56 AM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USA-FRANCE

Johnson won’t allow a vote.


28 posted on 07/13/2025 10:44:03 AM PDT by tennmountainman ( (“Less propaganda would be appreciated.” JimRobr 12-2-2023 DITTO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

> PLEASE don’t throw me in that briar patch!<

My thoughts, too.

EC


29 posted on 07/13/2025 10:50:35 AM PDT by Ex-Con777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: USA-FRANCE

I’m curious if release of the Epstein files, followed by resignations, would change the balance of power in the House or Senate,


30 posted on 07/13/2025 11:06:09 AM PDT by aimhigh (1 John 3:23 "And THIS is His commandment . . . . ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USA-FRANCE

Gosh I might actually with a Democrat


31 posted on 07/13/2025 11:07:29 AM PDT by HereInTheHeartland (“I don’t really care, Margaret.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh

A horny dude hires prostitutes for tens of thousands of dollars to service him. He wasn’t a pedophile either. All of those WOMEN were past puberty. When I was in the Army a lot of privates hired women for money to service them. IMHO.


32 posted on 07/13/2025 11:09:39 AM PDT by Pol-92064 (tax)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: USA-FRANCE

Can’t we deport this guy. I’m getting tired of all of these foreigners with big mouths badmouthing America. If the piglets don’t like it here, they should go to hell home. We never asked them to come here.


33 posted on 07/13/2025 11:31:08 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (If you have asylum in the U.S. and you go home to visit family, is it like violating a Protect Order)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reily
I saw the link on the MSN site...
So it must be true.

I won't read past that.

34 posted on 07/13/2025 11:37:56 AM PDT by lewislynn (If you think Elon Musk is a genius you havent seen his "truck".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: dpetty121263; Reily
I have no list but suspect GOP and Dem members are on some list that someone has..
Alan Dershowitz name was on the list. He pleads innocence, he's a liberal to the core, BUT, he can be trusted. He claims he's seen the list but is legally sworn to secrecy.

Here's the point. someone put his name on the list. He's innocent. In my mind that makes the enire list bogus because we don't know how many other names are also bogus...

The best thing to do is let it die.

There is no benefitfor knowing the list when any or even ALL the names are bogus...it would be a huge train wreck.

If Trump's name is/was on the list we would have known the day afte Epstein died.

35 posted on 07/13/2025 11:48:33 AM PDT by lewislynn (If you think Elon Musk is a genius you havent seen his "truck".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn

The “list” is a red herring.

The files are the key to the castle.


36 posted on 07/13/2025 11:49:50 AM PDT by cgbg (It was not us. It was them--all along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: USA-FRANCE

We have THREE separate branches of government, right? Executive, Legislative, and judicial. The Legislative can’t tell the Judicial squat.
Has it ever dawned on anyone that the judicial may be working on actual cases to bring actual charges to the pedophiles an they don’t want to risk the case by releasing the list. I suspect many screaming the loudest merely have a prurient interest an no interest in justice for the victims and punishment for the wicked! LEX


37 posted on 07/13/2025 11:58:26 AM PDT by lexington minuteman 1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USA-FRANCE

Maybe that is exactly what Trump wants.


38 posted on 07/13/2025 12:04:46 PM PDT by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marilyn vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn

It’s on many sites, here’s several.

https://thehill.com/video/oreilly-details-trump-conversation-about-innocent-people-connected-to-epstein-cuomo/10879040/

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2025/07/12/oreilly_on_not_releasing_epstein_list_people_will_get_destroyed_because_theres_not_going_to_be_any_context.html

https://www.westernjournal.com/watch-bill-oreilly-says-potus-told-exactly-wont-release-epstein-files-agree-reasoning/

Again O’Reilly could be lying but its out there!


39 posted on 07/13/2025 12:17:37 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn
Yes in theory that's the best approach but it might not!
I could metastasize into Trump's 3rd rate burglary aka Watergate!
40 posted on 07/13/2025 12:20:54 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson