Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Victor Davis Hanson: The Optimistic, the Realistic, and the Pessimistic Scenarios for Iran
The Daily Signal YT Channel ^ | June 20 2025 | victor davis hanson

Posted on 06/21/2025 7:03:06 AM PDT by texas booster

With the Israel-Iran war stretching into its second week, commentators from all sides of the political arena have been delivering their optimistic, pessimistic, and realistic opinions on the conflict.

Here are the facts:

The war is going in Israel's favor. There’s a 50-50 chance of regime change, but only a 25% chance the new leaders will be better than Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Iran; Israel; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iran; iranfafo; israel; vdh; victordavishanson; waronterror
The Trump administration might have to intervene but is holding back because it thinks Israel will find a creative way to destroy Iran's underground nuclear facilities on its own, surmises Victor Davis Hanson on today’s edition of “Victor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words:”
1 posted on 06/21/2025 7:03:06 AM PDT by texas booster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: texas booster
Ping! Out to the Victor Davis Hanson list

00:00 Introduction to the Iranian-Israeli Conflict
00:19 Optimistic Scenario
01:32 Pessimistic Scenario
04:57 Realistic Scenario
07:59 Conclusion and Final Thoughts

The Good, the Bad and the Ugly, indeed. Prof Hanson gives his ideas on what may happen next in this edition of the Iran/Israeli conflict. My money is on G_d.

FR Index of his articles: Victor Davis Hanson on FR

Town Hall: Victor Davis Hanson on Town Hall

American Greatness: Victor Davis Hanson on American Greatness

His website: Victor Davis Hanson

Please let me know if you want on or off this new VDH ping list.

As a reminder, Professor Hanson has asked that we do not post the full article of his writings. Thank you for following the link to finish his article.

Content created by the Center for American Greatness, Inc. is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a significant audience.

https://freerepublic.com/tag/victordavishanson/index

2 posted on 06/21/2025 7:05:41 AM PDT by texas booster (Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texas booster

Those odds are the reason the United States needs to let Israel handle this. The Arab States need to step up. I see no indication that the Iranian people are doing anything close to 1979. Iran may be turn into as much of a failed state as other American disasters as Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, Yemen and even Iraq. I wish the regime would be eliminated along with the nuke facilities but NOBODY can predict the outcome when Iran and Israel end the race of the missiles.


3 posted on 06/21/2025 7:11:32 AM PDT by shanover (...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texas booster

Please add me if I’m not on the list. Thanks


4 posted on 06/21/2025 7:26:04 AM PDT by SomeCallMeTim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: texas booster

25% of 50% — or 25% of 100%?


5 posted on 06/21/2025 7:27:17 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shanover

Doubt any therein who identify as “Persian” want “Arabs” to have much to do with defining their future. Same is likely with many others of the ethnic minorities within “Iran.” “Jewish” influence may also not be welcome, although “Persian + Jewish” combo has very long history, up until the status quo government.


6 posted on 06/21/2025 7:37:15 AM PDT by JohnBovenmyer (History rhymes, not repeats: Trump defends the legacy of Ft Sutter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JohnBovenmyer

The secular Persian is better than the Arab or Islamic option, whatever that might mean.


7 posted on 06/21/2025 7:42:53 AM PDT by Jonty30 (He was so fat that it took a year for his memory foam mattress to forget him. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SomeCallMeTim

Done!


8 posted on 06/21/2025 8:06:13 AM PDT by texas booster (Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

I have same question. He doesn’t specify.


9 posted on 06/21/2025 8:20:12 AM PDT by JohnBovenmyer (History rhymes, not repeats: Trump defends the legacy of Ft Sutter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: texas booster

Systematically taking out Revolutionary Guard commanders and ayatollahs increases the chances that the new regime won’t consist of Revolutionary Guard commanders and ayatollahs.


10 posted on 06/21/2025 8:37:50 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30
Status quo in Iran is the largest force in Shia Islam, but that's a smallish minority amongst Arabs and Islam as a whole. If status quo flagrantly fails the majority Sunnis dare not let that be spun as a failure of Islam, but can let it be spun as a failure of the Shia heresy as a whole, or perhaps a failure of the more specific Twelver Shia heresy. Converting Iran to Sunni Islam, and thus under their control, would be a big win for them, but a lot of Iranian history suggests they don't want Arab supremacy, they prefer some flavor of Persian supremacy. Not necessarily Islamic Persian supremacy.

Whether secular rule is achievable is unclear. But then the Shah's grip on power seemed strong before France sent over one elderly religious nut job. Shah may not have been super popular, but probably was more popular than the current regime is now. His modernization secular policies were somewhat popular outside the hardcore Shia. Had the Shah been as oppressive as his accusers claimed, and had the US had someone less pathetic than Carter to defend him, he was better equipped to fend off the zealots than the current government, post-Israeli bombardment, is to potentially fight off its young opponents. I figure the rank and file of the IRGC are with the regime and the installed leadership of the regular army will give at least lip service to the regime. Will the bulk of the army follow those orders or would it turn towards alternative leadership remains to be seen and is the major outstanding unknown. The regular army is big, significantly bigger than the IRGC. Israel hasn't attacked it much and Crown Prince is wooing it.

11 posted on 06/21/2025 9:17:01 AM PDT by JohnBovenmyer (History rhymes, not repeats: Trump defends the legacy of Ft Sutter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JohnBovenmyer

In 1980 nearly all the Iranians voted for the Islamic Republic ran by the mullahs. Two generations since then have become adults under that system. I think it now their way of life and few are willing to oppose it, fearing their lives. Iran will never change, the system is too ingrained.


12 posted on 06/22/2025 11:22:54 AM PDT by damper99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson