1st is Los Angeles, 2025.
2nd is Wisconsin, 2020.
3rd is Kristallnacht, 1938.
They want to punish their law-abiding citizens.
President Trump will stop them from doing this.
Well done JD.
The Trump set the precedent in LA.
Thanks again Mr. President and your entire administration.🇺🇸👍
It’s one thing to protect Federal officers doing their duty or keeping rioters from attacking Federal offices and Vance would be correct to point that out. It’s quite another to preclude rioters from burning private property or to keep the general peace. What Vance said there is a really bad premise abetting the continuing Federal usurpation of power. In the hands of Democrats, precedents like these WILL be abused.
Where this goes is back to John Roberts in his 2020 failure to address corrupt elections allowing leftist States to steal control of national offices, thus depriving the remaining States of their rights of representation, not to mention the people. Federalism cannot correct crooked ballot counts that protect corrupt local governance from electoral retribution. Else I could say “Let the Democrats burn their cities,” so that the people could see and act upon who and who does not abet that kind of chaos. But without electoral integrity, all bets are off. There is no depth of depravity or illegality these creeps will not go to stay in power to keep the money flowing.
So while I am sympathetic to what JD Vance said here, it is a abetting a Constitutional problem.
Who do those city leaders and citizens THINK is going to rebuild their cities??
There is no federal LEOs, only various agencies detailed to specific areas.
‘Rioters Burn’ Cities to the Ground: The only ones the democrats can get votes from and often.
Federal law enforcement's role should be arresting the city leadership and putting the city under temporary Federal control until clean elections can be held Subsequently, the local police could easily deal with the rioters.
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union...on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.US Const., Art. VI, Sec. 4.
Not that they are looking at this, but SHOULD BE - this is a rare instance of constitutional support for federal interference with a state's affairs.