Posted on 06/15/2025 9:34:33 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
Senator Alex Padilla (D-CA) said Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union” that President Donald Trump has set a tone “of escalation and extreme enforcement actions.”
Padilla said, “If all the Trump administration was doing was truly focusing on dangerous, violent criminals, as they suggest, there would be no debate, there would be no disagreement. But we’ve seen story after story after story of hardworking women and men, maybe undocumented, but otherwise law-abiding good people being subject to the terror that the this immigration enforcement operations is subjecting the people to. I needed to speak up. I needed to try to get the information from the secretary that they refuse to provide in hearing after hearing.”
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Why is this bully still in the newscycle?
“”Padilla said, “If all the Trump administration was doing was truly focusing on dangerous, violent criminals, as they suggest, there would be no debate”””
Is that why you fought so hard to save a “Maryland man” who is an MS13 member?
“Padilla: Trump Set a Tone of ‘Escalation and Extreme Enforcement Actions’”
Padilla: Democrats have Set a Tone of escalation for insurrection by their rhetoric and actions.
There, fixed it
Hey dirt bag, is burning cars and committing acts of vandalism against private property considered violent?
Baloney! This person would disagree with anything and everything President Trump might do.
Tell that to the granny taking selfies inside the Capitol.
Every senator, a president in their own mind...
Killer Padiller. Still pushing his American citizenship certificate to make people think he’s a billy badass. I’m glad some real Americans kicked his mangy butt. Another token for his gringo massas in the RAT Party.
My uneducated guess is that, the faster they swirl round and round the drain, the harder they push in an attempt to stay relevant. If he becomes irrelevant he [in his mind] ceases to exist.
Someone grab a plunger and speed the yapping doo-doo head on his way.
Cry baby. He’s not used to being scolded.
“But we’ve seen story after story after story of hardworking women and men, maybe undocumented, but otherwise law-abiding good people...”
Um, because if you’re UNDOCUMENTED, you are here ILLEGALLY and you are BREAKING THE LAW in the FIRST place!
GTFO.
Go back to your La Raza masters little boy before you get your butt kicked. Stop stalking and harassing our American women. Noem wasn’t impressed with your Carlos Danger stunt. She said if you want to talk to her, call her on the phone. Don’t forget to speak English. Just sayin’.
They chose a ‘big’ guy to try to push his way past Secret Service to present an alpha male appearance, but most of us think it presented a big p. trying to attack a woman. Most of them don’t fare too well.
Kinda wonder what he would have done if he had successfully charged through Noem’s security team?
All the cabinet secretaries need to carry.
Israel and Iran sort of pushed him out of the Swamp News cycle.
They were always going to return to the regularly scheduled swamp cycle
Let me see if I get this straight: There is a sitting US Senator - someone who’s job it is to make the law, standing here looking me in the eye and telling me, with a big smile on his face, that the law doesn’t and shouldn’t matter?
If the law doesn’t matter and we should just ignore if we don’t like it, what do I need you for Mr. Padilla?
No dispute at all.
Let them be good citizens in their own country. Come to America legally
Padilla should get the same exact treatment that the J6’s got.
Many of those folks waited months or years for their trials, and were eventually charged with 18 U.S.C. § 111(a), “assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers or employees”. Felony, 8 years.
It’s on video, there’s no factual dispute.
Bill Essayli should file charges.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.