Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Supreme Court Unanimously Tells Mexico to Get Lost
Townhall ^ | June 05, 2025 | Katie Pavlich |

Posted on 06/05/2025 9:30:08 AM PDT by george76

In a unanimous decision the Supreme Court ruled 9-0 Thursday that the government of Mexico cannot hold American gun manufacturers accountable for criminal activity. More specifically, cartel violence south of the border.

"The Government of Mexico sued seven American gun manufacturers, alleging that the companies aided and abetted unlawful gun sales that routed firearms to Mexican drug cartels," the order states. "Mexico focuses on production of 'military style' assault weapons, but these products are widely legal and purchased by ordinary consumers. Manufacturers cannot be charged with assisting criminal acts simply because Mexican cartel members also prefer these guns. The same applies to firearms with Spanish language names or graphics alluding to Mexican history—while they may be 'coveted by the cartels,' they also may appeal to 'millions of law-abiding Hispanic Americans.' Even the failure to make guns with non-defaceable serial numbers cannot show that manufacturers have 'joined both mind and hand' with lawbreakers in the manner required for aiding and abetting."

"Because Mexico’s complaint does not plausibly allege that the defendant gun manufacturers aided and abetted gun dealers’ unlawful sales of firearms to Mexican traffickers, PLCAA [The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act] bars the lawsuit," it continues. "Congress enacted PLCAA to halt lawsuits attempting to make gun manufacturers pay for harms resulting from the criminal or unlawful misuse of firearms. Mexico’s suit closely resembles those lawsuits. The Court doubts Congress intended to draft such a capacious way out of PLCAA, and in fact it did not."

Even the liberal, gun control prone Justices shot down Mexico's argument.

“This is a tremendous victory for the firearm industry and the rule of law. For too long, gun control activists have attempted to twist basic tort law to malign the highly-regulated U.S. firearm industry with the criminal actions of violent organized crime, both here in the United States and abroad,” National Shooting Sports Foundation Senior Vice President Lawrence Keane said in response to the ruling. “The firearm industry is sympathetic to plight of those in Mexico who are victims of rampant and uncontrolled violence at the hands of narco-terrorist drug cartels. The firearm industry works closely with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) to prevent the illegal straw purchasing of firearms and the illegal transnational smuggling of firearms. This unequivocal decision by the Supreme Court that PLCAA applies and there is no evidence whatsoever that U.S. manufacturers are in any way responsible is verification of commitment to responsible firearm ownership.”


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Mexico; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; aliens; armedcitizen; banglist; bloggers; guncontrol; rkba; scotus; secondamendment; supremecourt

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 06/05/2025 9:30:08 AM PDT by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: george76

The tragedy is Mexico having access to OUR courts in an attempt to COMPEL a relief.


2 posted on 06/05/2025 9:40:38 AM PDT by Salvavida (NS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Wow...9-0.....amazing.


3 posted on 06/05/2025 9:41:58 AM PDT by V_TWIN (America...so great even the people that hate it refuse to leave!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

I wanna be pleased. But remember, when your attack is going well, it’s often a set up, leading you into an ambush.

The Surpremes are up to something.


4 posted on 06/05/2025 9:44:12 AM PDT by DesertRhino (2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2025... RETURN OF THE JEDI….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvavida

Other countries are adept at using our freedoms and system against us.

That started with Clinton and obama and biden continued to allow the US to be a doormat to the world....and W wasn’t any better.


5 posted on 06/05/2025 9:46:45 AM PDT by V_TWIN (America...so great even the people that hate it refuse to leave!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: george76

Same with cars, baseball bats, knives, whiskey bottles, or anything else that can kill or injure.


6 posted on 06/05/2025 9:50:05 AM PDT by DownInFlames (P)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

They showed us they don’t care about the second Amendment last week by refusing to hear cases suing over assault rifle and magazine capacity laws. So something else is behind this ruling.... something like they don’t want China to be able to sue us for a million causes...

Big money is behind this ruling somehow, in ways we cannot imagine.


7 posted on 06/05/2025 9:51:50 AM PDT by DesertRhino (2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2025... RETURN OF THE JEDI….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

How much money did this cost the gun companies before this decision?

I remember when guns were way cheaper than now. Costs go up because of these stupid lawsuits in the states as well as this.


8 posted on 06/05/2025 10:00:16 AM PDT by packrat35 (Pureblood! No clot shot for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Mexico’s mistake in this case was suing the gun manufacturers. They should refile the lawsuit against Obama and Eric Holder and the BATF for ‘Fast and Furious’. They’d have a much stronger case for directly “aiding and abetting”.


9 posted on 06/05/2025 10:07:00 AM PDT by vikingd00d (chown -R us ~you/base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Surprised at a 9-0 ruling.


10 posted on 06/05/2025 10:09:21 AM PDT by Lazamataz (I'm so on fire that I feel the need to stop, drop, and roll!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

The simple fact is that even in the absence of the PLCAA, there is a complete lack of privity of contract between the gun manufacturers on the one hand, and the people or government of Mexico on the other. First of all, the manufacturers are completely regulated, and so are clearly producing legal products with a lot of oversight from our federal government. Second, they don’t sell these firearms directly to any member of the public, they sell them through highly regulated wholesalers, who in turn sell them to individual, highly regulated, federal firearms licensees. Those FFLs in turn sell them to the ublic, after going through a highly regulated process designed to ensure that only people legally able to own firearms are able to purchase them. Thus, the manufacturers are at least three transactions away from the final user of the firearm, and perhaps more. In any event, there is no legal principle which permits an innocent party to be held responsible, either criminally, or financially, for the criminal actions of someone not under their control.


11 posted on 06/05/2025 10:09:33 AM PDT by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." The Weapons Shops of Isher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

9-0


12 posted on 06/05/2025 10:13:07 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Import The Third World,Become The Third World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

The SC has reversed the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals which had reversed a District Court decision which had ruled there was no violation the law named PLCAA.

It was less a pro gun than it was a smack down of an embarrassing Apppeals Court decision which was so blaringly defiant of Congress that even the prog justices couldn’t twist around it.

Having found no way around the law the Progs joined in with glee having now earned some pro gun cred they can use on a later case to harm gun rights.

This SC decision does absolutely nothing to advance gun rights.


13 posted on 06/05/2025 10:14:35 AM PDT by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

The cartels are the ones smuggling them into Mexico ILLEGALLY.

Maybe Mexico should do something about THAT and there would not be a problem.

Why is it everyone is always blaming someone other than themselves?


14 posted on 06/05/2025 10:14:41 AM PDT by Openurmind (AI - An Illusion for Aptitude Intrusion to Alter Intellect. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Ay! Yi! Yi! In a similar vein, I’m looking forward to a future decision scorching the cases bubbling up against Big Oil for causing climate change


15 posted on 06/05/2025 10:23:40 AM PDT by j.havenfarm (24 years on Free Republic, 12/10/24! More than 10,500 replies and still not shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Fast and Furious


16 posted on 06/05/2025 10:24:24 AM PDT by Karliner (Heb 4:12 Rom 8:28 Rev 3, "...This is the end of the beginning." Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
The Surpremes are up to something.

Maybe they saw the light. We can hope. :)

17 posted on 06/05/2025 10:27:18 AM PDT by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

The pizza deliveries are working.


18 posted on 06/05/2025 10:33:35 AM PDT by decal (They won't stop, so they'll have to be stopped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: george76

A serious question.

If the Mexican government at all levels has been bought by the drug cartels, why would Mexico and the drug cartels want to harm US gun manufacturers?

Is this just a play for money?

Did they want to financially damage the firearms manufacturers?


19 posted on 06/05/2025 10:39:16 AM PDT by Robert357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Mexico should indict Eric Holder and demand his extradition to face trial in Mexico.

Trump would hand him over yesterday.

L


20 posted on 06/05/2025 10:42:01 AM PDT by Lurker ( Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson