Posted on 06/03/2025 8:00:37 AM PDT by MinorityRepublican
Sources say
I kinda hope these sources are accurate... I’m not very happy with Barrett, et al., either.
Will admit I thought Amy Coney Barrett was a solid choice.
Boy, WAS I WRONG!!!!!!!!!!
“Trump has privately complained that the Supreme Court justices he appointed have not sufficiently stood behind his agenda,”
They are there to defend the Constitution, not stand behind ANY politicians agenda.
So much for, “with portfolio.”
I think CNN is just trying to force a wedge between Barrett and Trump
Oooo a source … cnn.
Let me know if a reputable news source has a statement from someone in the know and not recently deplatformed by USAID cuts.
Privately....and it’s on the web...that’s real private...
I’d certainly hope so!
It’s because of the sleazeball.
A dictator would not be complaining about a supreme court, he’d be having its uncooperative justices arrested and shot.
“President Donald Trump has privately complained”
no, he didn’t
Attorney Robert Barnes tried to warn everyone about ACB but people just assumed she’d be a female Scalia. They couldn’t have been more wrong. There were other women he could’ve picked
I wouldn't be surprised if Trump leaked this to CNN.
He's basically saying "what's the deal?"
CNN polluting again. It took two to concoct this potion.
The Federalist Society recruits seems as liberal as the others, and nowhere near the astute Constitutional opinions provided by Thomas.
Problem is, they are doing neither.
Lawyers can turn on a dime. That’s why so many politicians are lawyers. It might be best to appoint politicians with a conservative track record. Helps but doesn’t guarantee anything.
Bad look, if true
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.