Posted on 05/30/2025 3:58:50 AM PDT by karpov
Congress specifically delegated to the president the power. And it is far, far more constitutional than the powers unelected bureaucrats took for themselves to set policies and create laws without congressional approval!
So, the WSJ can stuff it.
LOL! Who really cares what some crapola “international” court rules? Mainly, courts such as these are make-work for essentially worthless lawyers.
The Constitution give Congress, not the president, the power to impose taxes.
lol. The ink wasn’t even dry on his celebratory report when the appeals court squashed it
While it’s true that Congress has taxation powers, many such powers have been formally delegated to the executive.
President Trump’s EOs have complied with the letter of the law, and are legally valid. If Congress were to step up and handle the situation, people may be most inclined to give a damn.
The Wall Street Urinal mouths its standard garbage BS...
The Globalist Journal gives their opinion.
Lol WSJ Lol
What’s your point?
Hold on wall street. Congress will be passing a law next week to disallow injunctions against a sitting president. If they want an in junction with, it will have to come from SCOTUS.
The unspoken truth behind legal barricades thrown up to stop
Trump’s actions is that they are an admission by the deepest
of Deep States that nothing is allowed to be changed. We are
hurtling off a financial and societal cliff at warp speed and
the Courts are saying, “That’s the way it is and that’s the way
it will always be,” regardless of the damage to our Nation.
You posted a stayed decision, after posting this same crud yesterday?
You don’t understand the law.
This a classic case of judicial activism by the court.
The globalist and Wall Street pigs couldn't give a hoot about anything but make more money.
Part of their alliance actually wants to destroy our system, but they don't mind getting richer at the same time.
WSJ has no problem losing all those well paying jobs to other tariff practicing countries. Stopped reading the WSJ an awhile back because they are full of it. I can do my own financial analyses without them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.