Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Female Cop BEGS FOR HER LIFE After Suspect STEALS Her Firearm
Officer Tatum -- youtube ^ | May 18, 2025 | Officer Tatum

Posted on 05/23/2025 1:11:19 AM PDT by xxqqzz

eternity This is why I think law 1:06 enforcement is struggling in today's uh 1:09 society where they're creating wifified 1:12 police officers Like I like I I don't 1:15 understand how nowadays when you go 1:17 through the police academy they do not 1:19 teach or encourage people to be violent 1:22 Like a being a police officer 1:24 necessitate a level of control violence 1:28 When I was a cop I'm ready at any point 1:30 any time anywhere any day to put my 1:32 hands on you if I have to And if it come 1:35 down to it and I got to pull the trigger 1:36 on you I'm pulling the trigger on you I 1:38 don't understand how cops today don't 1:41 shoot these people instead of letting 1:43 them kill you I don't get it And it's 1:47 training And this is why in part they 1:49 say women shouldn't be cops cuz I think 1:52 that majority of them are not violent 1:54 enough That's not every police officer 1:56 that's a female because I know some they 1:57 got that they with it And the ones 1:59 listening right now you with it I'm not 2:01 talking about you I'm talking about the 2:02 other girl in the department that you 2:03 know ain't with it All right wrote a 2:05 clip because this woman literally got a 2:06 gun taken from her which was absolutely 2:09 insane And and and let me just say this 2:11 I don't want to pick on women just women 2:14 I know women probably do this more than 2:16 men but there's men cuz there's a clip 2:18 that we got and maybe we'll do it in 2:20

(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; fountainvalley; lookwhohatescops; nobodysearches; policewomen

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
Pretty good analysis by a former policeman. She should have gotten out of her car and not drawn her gun. Probably though, she was too weak to confront him physically. Then was he approached, she should have shot him. I guess he was much stronger and could wrestle the gun out of her hands. Then she begged him not to shoot her and hid behind a police car. Her partner helped for the suspect to drop the gun. At that point the suspect could have killed either policeman and he should have just shot the suspect. Then the suspect goes inside the policewoman's police car still armed. Then the partner shoots the suspect when it was more questionable whether the suspect was a threat.
1 posted on 05/23/2025 1:11:19 AM PDT by xxqqzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: xxqqzz

Which is worse for society at large...women drivers or women cops? You decide.


2 posted on 05/23/2025 1:50:32 AM PDT by Qwapisking ("The left will rue the day they cheated Trump out of the 2020 election forever" L.Star )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xxqqzz
Against my better judgement, I'm going to be a devil's advocate. I think in recent years, as the police have been lambasted in the media concerning shootings, that they are now being told - basically having it drummed into them - to wait till the last possible moment to fire on anyone. And perhaps the police themselves believe that if they do fire, the higher ups will not have their back.

I also noticed that in the first video, when the perp is running away, it looks like the perp is easily outrunning the officer.

Bottom line though - I agree with the former police officer. The perp should have been shot as soon as he is walking up to the second police officer.

3 posted on 05/23/2025 2:12:38 AM PDT by 7thson (I've got a seat at the big conference table! I'm gonna paint my logo on it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xxqqzz

She just wanted to wear the uniform and hang out with the ‘guys’...watches too much TV!!!


4 posted on 05/23/2025 2:16:54 AM PDT by SMARTY (In politics, stupidity is not a handicap. Napoleon Bonaparte I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY
Isn't "You NEVER Lose Your Gun 101" a go/no go class in the academy ?

I mean . . . REALLY . . . . go or NO go.

5 posted on 05/23/2025 3:28:44 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true, I have no proof, but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY

She wanted medical coverage and maternity leave.


6 posted on 05/23/2025 3:34:00 AM PDT by anton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: xxqqzz

This video was posted a few days ago in a format my computer would not load, so this is my first viewing. And I liked the analysis this ex-cop gave.

This woman has absolutely zero business being a cop. PERIOD. Most self respecting people would be totally ashamed of letting someone take their gun away from them and then begging for their life.

This chick is apparently using the Weaver stance as she protrudes her arms away from her body while holding the gun. She’s inviting the guy to snatch it away. I totally dislike the Weaver stance and never use it.

I took my Class 1 Concealed Carry shooting test and got a perfect 24 out of 24 score and never used that crappy stance once. The stance I use does not expose my full frontal body width while shooting. And my arms are not fully extended away from my body, rather they are about half the distance as compared to the Weaver. The stance I use allows for steadying the weapon much better than fully extended arms do.

The Weaver stance gives your opponent the full width of your body as a larger target to shoot at and provides your opponent a better chance to take it away from you in close quarters, such as a home or car.


7 posted on 05/23/2025 3:39:17 AM PDT by redfreedom (Happiness is shopping at Walmart and not hearing Spanish once!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redfreedom

CAR stance?


8 posted on 05/23/2025 3:47:08 AM PDT by Sirius Lee ("Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: redfreedom

What’s your “stance” called then?


9 posted on 05/23/2025 3:51:28 AM PDT by albie (U)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: albie; Sirius Lee

I do not know what it’s called. I watched it used on TV once loved it and copied it. For a right handed person it goes like this:

Turn your body 90 degrees to the right of the target so only the left side of your body is exposed as a target, which is roughly half the target size compared to your full front.

Turn your head to your left to face the target.

Place your left elbow firmly into your rib cage with your left arm going upwards to steady the weapon.

Hold the weapon in your right had with your upper arm up against your chest. Now the weapon is being held by both hands with both arms steadied against your body.

The weapon is held high enough to be aligned with your eyes in order to aim it.

Aim and pull the trigger.

Having both arms steadied against your chest eliminates much of the wavering that happens with arms stretched out full forward. And it gives your opponent only half of your body as a target.

Also learn to shoot single handed with either the left or right hand. This works for shooting around corners as only your arm and head will be exposed. If that dumbass Weaver stance is used, you will be exposing your full body width at that corner.

For the concealed shooting test, I’m right handed, and shot six shots holding the weapon with my left hand only, and hit all six times at a target 50 feet away the size of a piece of printing paper (8 1/2 x 11).

It takes lots of range time, but worth it.


10 posted on 05/23/2025 4:09:00 AM PDT by redfreedom (Happiness is shopping at Walmart and not hearing Spanish once!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 7thson

Yeah, that may be the way they are training them in some areas of California. Both policepersons were unwilling to shoot when they had to shoot.

Also, probably not good of the policeperson to draw her gun, which maybe escalated the situation.

It is also common sense that a policeperson should be fairly big and strong. These women probably don’t meet what used to be the physical requirements.


11 posted on 05/23/2025 4:10:42 AM PDT by xxqqzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: xxqqzz

Stylish!


12 posted on 05/23/2025 4:27:32 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qwapisking

Women pilots, women doctors (I had one make a HUGE mistake during surgery and had to call for a backup surgeon and a 1.5 hr surgery turned into an EIGHT HOUR surgery - I ONLY found out because they billed me for the extra surgeon and insurance broke it down why - I didn’t have to pay), women military officers, women LE....

ALL A BAD IDEA


13 posted on 05/23/2025 4:56:01 AM PDT by Cowgirl of Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 7thson

He should have been shot when he put his hands on her weapon and pulled it. It was up against his body pointing at him she should have pulled the trigger. Drama queen.


14 posted on 05/23/2025 5:15:42 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: redfreedom
Sounds like Center Axis Relock.


15 posted on 05/23/2025 5:17:17 AM PDT by Sirius Lee ("Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: xxqqzz

“And this is why in part they 1:49 say women shouldn’t be cops cuz I think that majority of them are not violent enough “. The commentator sounds like the typical cop I have come into contact with - power hungry and has ego problems.
Why first responders in general have a bad reputation.
How this woman proceeded to respond may be wrong, but the attitude of the commentator, as shown by the comment, is equally wrong.


16 posted on 05/23/2025 5:18:18 AM PDT by jimfr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xxqqzz

Don’t pull your gun if you aren’t prepared to use it. She was bluffing with the gun as if it’s very presence was a deterrent. The second he extended his arms toward the gun, she should have emptied the magazine.


17 posted on 05/23/2025 6:02:43 AM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (America -- July 4, 1776 to November 3, 2020 -- R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redfreedom

Interesting and thank you! The “Weaver” stance is mostly all you see on cop shows and YouTube videos of cops in action.


18 posted on 05/23/2025 6:03:00 AM PDT by albie (U)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cowgirl of Justice

Women police chiefs, fire chiefs...


19 posted on 05/23/2025 6:07:40 AM PDT by subterfuge (I'm a pure-blood!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; BraveMan; cardinal4; ...

20 posted on 05/23/2025 6:20:39 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Putin should skip ahead to where he kills himself in the bunker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson