Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ChicagoConservative27

Well, of course! Because as everyone knows, insurance companies don’t lose money. If they have to pay out anything, they are going to get it back, if the whole country has to pay for it!


3 posted on 05/20/2025 1:26:29 PM PDT by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Flaming Conservative

This is a key issue. Are rates raised elsewhere, due to staggering insurance payouts in California? Or are rates raised only in locales which have had fires or other disasters?

Someone told me that a national company such as State Farm, actually operates as 50 separate companies, so that each state has to balance premiums and payouts, for financial purposes. I don’t know if that’s true. But if true, rates should only be raised in such states which have experienced a disaster. In CALIFORNIA for example, the higher fire danger there should justify higher premiums than elsewhere.

Ditto Florida and other coastal states for hurricane damage.


5 posted on 05/20/2025 1:32:11 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Flaming Conservative
Because as everyone knows, insurance companies don’t lose money.

Insurance companies that lose money do not remain viable. They cannot insure other customers. Insurance is a pooled resource. If the resource is insufficient no one else is insured.
29 posted on 05/20/2025 2:06:28 PM PDT by af_vet_1981 ( The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson