Skip to comments.
Trump Justice Dept. considers removing key check on lawmaker prosecutions
The Washington Post ^
| May 17, 2025
| Perry Stein
Posted on 05/17/2025 5:03:21 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
The Justice Department’s Public Integrity Section is charged with ensuring cases against elected officials are not politically motivated. The Trump administration is considering changing that.
Federal prosecutors across the country may soon be able to indict members of Congress without approval from lawyers in the Justice Department’s Public Integrity Section, according to three people familiar with a proposal delivered to attorneys in the section last week.
Under the proposal, investigators and prosecutors would also not be required to consult with the section’s attorneys during key steps of probes into public officials, altering a long-standing provision in the Justice Department’s manual that outlines how investigations of elected officials should be conducted.
If adopted, the changes would remove a layer of review intended to ensure that cases against public officials are legally sound and not politically motivated. Career prosecutors in the Public Integrity Section guided and signed off on the criminal investigations into alleged corruption by
New York Mayor Eric Adams (D) and
former Democratic senator Bob Menendez.
A Justice Department spokesman confirmed the proposal and said that no final decisions have been made. The three people familiar with the proposal spoke on the condition of anonymity because they fear reprisals.
Attorney General Pam Bondi has repeatedly accused the Biden administration of having weaponized the Justice Department and has vowed to remove politics from the nation’s premier law enforcement agency. Since being sworn in, she has closely aligned the department — which traditionally keeps some distance from the White House — with the president, ratcheting up immigration enforcement and refocusing the civil rights division on culture war fights that go beyond traditional conservative causes such as religious freedom.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Federal prosecutors across the country may soon be able to indict members of Congress without approval from lawyers in the Justice Department’s Public Integrity Section... Democrats will no longer have a monopoly on lawfare.
That's a shame.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
This is what I voted for.
2
posted on
05/17/2025 5:10:56 PM PDT
by
philippa
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Yeah that public integrity section did such a fantastic job when they went after Trump. They made sure it wasn’t politically motivated./s
3
posted on
05/17/2025 5:33:39 PM PDT
by
DesertRhino
(2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2025... RETURN OF THE JEDI...Low IQ morons also have t)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Claim from the Compost... is it believable?
4
posted on
05/17/2025 5:34:37 PM PDT
by
Carl Vehse
(Make Austin Texas Again!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I suspect that they’re BLOCKING INDICTMENTS right now. We get pissed at Blondi, but maybe she’s effectively handcuffed. Don’t know, but why get rid of that bunch now?
5
posted on
05/17/2025 5:41:58 PM PDT
by
BobL
To: E. Pluribus Unum
“The Justice Department’s Public Integrity Section is charged with ensuring cases against elected officials are not politically motivated.” Seriously? So why have we not heard any dissent from them in 4+ years of totally biased lawfare against pres Trump and other republicans? They FA, now let’s see them FO...
6
posted on
05/17/2025 5:44:28 PM PDT
by
Texan5
("You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line"... )
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I see that it is being reported by the Washington Post.
Has any of this been independently verified?
7
posted on
05/17/2025 6:52:00 PM PDT
by
ProgressingAmerica
(We cannot vote our way out of these problems. The only way out is to activist our way out.)
To: BobL
We get pissed at Blondi,
Speak for yourself juvenile pinhead.
8
posted on
05/17/2025 7:27:10 PM PDT
by
lewislynn
To: lewislynn
9
posted on
05/17/2025 10:49:42 PM PDT
by
roving
To: philippa
F considering! we want it done, period! these people will never be held responsible for thier crimes if we dont
To: philippa
Imagine the government protecting thier own from criminal prosecutions, amazing
To: E. Pluribus Unum
“key steps of probes into public officials”
I was checking that pesky constitution thingie, and I can’t seem to find this language...
12
posted on
05/18/2025 6:33:23 AM PDT
by
joe fonebone
(And the people said NO!! The end.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Since being sworn in, she [ Blondi ] has closely aligned the department - which traditionally keeps some distance from the White House - with the President and Fox News.
13
posted on
05/18/2025 7:09:29 AM PDT
by
PIF
(They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
To: Texan5
Jethro Gaetz was never indicted. Maybe the system worked for him?
14
posted on
05/18/2025 7:18:08 AM PDT
by
Oystir
( )
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson