Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hawley reignites 'PELOSI Act' push to ban lawmakers from trading stocks
Fox News ^ | April 28, 2025 | Anders Hagstrom

Posted on 04/28/2025 9:56:51 AM PDT by Navy Patriot

Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., is reintroducing legislation Monday that would ban members of Congress and their spouses from trading stocks while in office.

Hawley introduced the "PELOSI Act" in 2023, but failed to make progress under President Joe Biden's administration. The proposal has since gained popularity among lawmakers on both sides of the aisle, and President Donald Trump himself said last week that he would "absolutely" sign such a ban if it came to his desk.

"Members of Congress should be fighting for the people they were elected to serve—not day trading at the expense of their constituents," Hawley told Fox News Digital in a statement.

"Americans have seen politician after politician turn a profit using information not available to the general public. It’s time we ban all members of Congress from trading and holding stocks and restore Americans’ trust in our nation’s legislative body," he added.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: hawley; pelosi

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.

Pelosi should be in Prison at Gitmo, not a House Madame!
1 posted on 04/28/2025 9:56:51 AM PDT by Navy Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

Oh Nancy, in your last days in the nursing home you’re going to think about me and giggle.


2 posted on 04/28/2025 10:00:18 AM PDT by kawhill (Stop by sometime, maybe I can give you peace. Oh, I'd like that, maybe I can give it to you. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

Didn’t congress ban lawmakers from trading stocks years ago and then when no one was looking remove the ban ? LOL


3 posted on 04/28/2025 10:01:50 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

This is a law that should have been passed 30 years ago in the Gingrich Congress. We’ve had Republican-controlled Congresses before. The reason it hasn’t passed is because way too many Republicans benefit from insider trading.


4 posted on 04/28/2025 10:01:51 AM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard (When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

I believe you are correct.


5 posted on 04/28/2025 10:03:12 AM PDT by Navy Patriot (President Trump Decisively Won Popular & E.C., Celebrate Recivilization!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard

>>This is a law that should have been passed 30 years ago in the Gingrich Congress.

The STOCK act passed years ago, it’s only enforced against Republicans. Even if the PELOSI Act passes, it too will only be enforced against Republicans.


6 posted on 04/28/2025 10:05:45 AM PDT by vikingd00d (chown -R us ~you/base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

Dems wont vote for it..why, they will say “Hey that’s different” when Dems make millions off of insider trading


7 posted on 04/28/2025 10:18:40 AM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

When they become a congress critter the only thing they should be able to touch is their pay everything else should be in a Trust


8 posted on 04/28/2025 11:12:32 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

Better also add the senior staff for each member of congress to that ban, too.


9 posted on 04/28/2025 11:24:37 AM PDT by alancarp (George Orwell was an optimist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

There is literally a fund you can buy that mimics what Pelosi and her husband buy and it has beat the market every year...


10 posted on 04/28/2025 11:29:55 AM PDT by packrat35 (Pureblood! No clot shot for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

when working for the government as a contractor or an employee you sign documents telling you that conflict of interest is illegal, period, so why are we not doing this with those who vote on laws benefiting their portfolio


11 posted on 04/28/2025 11:42:22 AM PDT by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: packrat35

What’s the name of the fund?

If I ever have any real money to invest, might have to try it.


12 posted on 04/28/2025 11:44:19 AM PDT by wally_bert (I cannot be sure for certain, but in my personal opinion I am certain that I am not sure..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kawhill

I predict she never goes into a nursing home. Her handlers will prop her up in office until the bitter end.


13 posted on 04/28/2025 11:55:29 AM PDT by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ViLaLuz

Same as Finestein. Same as Biden. All they are is a figurehead for whackjob insane staffers to implement absurd policies.


14 posted on 04/28/2025 12:01:55 PM PDT by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: wally_bert

https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/etf/etf-named-after-nancy-pelosi-tracking-congressional-democrats-stock-trades-surpasses-s-p-500-with-tech-triumph-1033116562


15 posted on 04/28/2025 2:19:40 PM PDT by packrat35 (Pureblood! No clot shot for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

The “Pelosi Act”. How appropriate!!


16 posted on 04/28/2025 3:13:59 PM PDT by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

At the investment firms I worked for in the past, all trades had to be pre-cleared with a company compliance officer. I even wrote an application to facilitate the clearances. No need for a trading ban - Congress just needs a compliance officer to make sure members do not trade on information related to pending legislation..


17 posted on 04/29/2025 12:05:10 PM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ([CTRL]-[GALT]-[DELETE])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

Disagree, it’s too easy to use media to sabotage a stock with suggestion of government investigation or regulatory changes.


18 posted on 04/29/2025 1:25:24 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (President Trump Decisively Won Popular & E.C., Celebrate Recivilization!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson