Skip to comments.
Judges Worry Trump Could Tell U.S. Marshals to Stop Protecting Them
The New York Times ^
| April 25, 2025, 10:37 a.m. ET
| Mattathias Schwartz and Emily Bazelon
Posted on 04/25/2025 10:32:17 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum
2
posted on
04/25/2025 10:33:22 AM PDT
by
GingisK
To: GingisK
That is the exact comment I was going to write.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
It’s an outstanding way to save money.
4
posted on
04/25/2025 10:34:18 AM PDT
by
brownsfan
(It's going to take real, serious, hard times to wake the American public.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
be a shame if those judges lost their protection for, you know, reasons.
5
posted on
04/25/2025 10:34:34 AM PDT
by
Qwapisking
("The left will rue the day they cheated Trump out of the 2020 election forever" L.Star )
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Thanks for the tip, Mattathias and Emily.
6
posted on
04/25/2025 10:34:37 AM PDT
by
SpaceBar
To: GingisK
I didn’t know that they even had protection. You’re right it is a great idea
7
posted on
04/25/2025 10:35:33 AM PDT
by
cableguymn
(Can't cancel all of us)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
They could always hire a gang banger from El Salvador.
8
posted on
04/25/2025 10:35:40 AM PDT
by
Fledermaus
("It turns out all we really needed was a new President!")
To: GingisK
Great idea!
Ya , that is a great idea , make them pay for their own security
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Maybe they deserve to lose protection. Many are acting lawlessly against the nation.
10
posted on
04/25/2025 10:36:09 AM PDT
by
Wpin
("I Have Sworn Upon the Altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny...")
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Criminal lawless “judges* like Boesberg should not have federal marshal protection.
Federal marshals should be arresting them for their crimes like they just arrested Judge Dugan in Milwaukee.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Do it. Why should the lives of America’s greatest lawmen be endangered protecting these far-left tyrants in black robes?
12
posted on
04/25/2025 10:39:53 AM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(Why are the DemonRATS so afraid of a Department of GOVERNMENT EFFICIENCY?)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
There’s 1770 Federal Judges...
To: E. Pluribus Unum
There is no evidence that Mr. Trump has contemplated revoking security from judges.
So the most important fact is buried in the 7th paragraph.
14
posted on
04/25/2025 10:41:13 AM PDT
by
hanamizu
( )
To: GingisK
Came to say the same. Great idea, judge.
Thanks.
15
posted on
04/25/2025 10:42:08 AM PDT
by
madison10
(God chose President Trump. Satan chose judges and Democrats.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Let the People decide their fates...If the People want to dish out some opinions on these Judges, I have no problem with it.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Why are they afraid? They can just issue a nationwide injunction requiring whatever degree of protection they want.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Turn off their climate control too. To save energy, ya know. We all want to do our part for Mother Gaia
18
posted on
04/25/2025 10:45:37 AM PDT
by
Colorado Doug
(Now I know how the Indians felt to be sold out for a few beads and trinkets)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Well, stop doing stupid chit.
19
posted on
04/25/2025 10:46:46 AM PDT
by
Mathews
(I have faith Malachi is right!!! Any day now...)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Judicial tyranny has ramifications? Who knew? So glad they are starting to realize that their actions may have consequences.
20
posted on
04/25/2025 10:47:20 AM PDT
by
jimpick
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson