Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Appeals court backs judge in Abrego Garcia case, saying Trump DOJ ‘would reduce the rule of law to lawlessness’
cnn ^ | 04/17/2025 | Tierney Sneed and Devan Cole

Posted on 04/17/2025 2:59:46 PM PDT by DFG

A federal appeals court rejected the Trump administration’s request that it halt the next steps Judge Paula Xinis is seeking to take in the case concerning a migrant who was wrongly deported to El Salvador, with a strident warning about the rule of law and the possibility the dispute presented an “incipient crisis.”

The 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals said in its seven-page ruling Thursday that the Trump administration’s assertions in the case “should be shocking not only to judges, but to the intuitive sense of liberty that Americans far removed from courthouses still hold dear.”

The unanimous ruling was written by Judge Harvie Wilkinson, an appointee of former President Ronald Reagan. In it, he was extremely critical of the administration’s effort to undo some of Xinis’ recent orders in the case, sounding alarm bells about how its maneuverings in the matter have resulted in the two branches “grinding irrevocably against one another in a conflict that promises to diminish both.”

“The Judiciary will lose much from the constant intimations of its illegitimacy, to which by dent of custom and detachment we can only sparingly reply,” Wilkinson wrote. “The Executive will lose much from a public perception of its lawlessness and all of its attendant contagions. The Executive may succeed for a time in weakening the courts, but over time history will script the tragic gap between what was and all that might have been, and law in time will sign its epitaph.”

The appeals court used the order to weigh in on the broader atmosphere around President Donald Trump’s conflict with the judiciary.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 4thlackgoodjudgement; arrestthe4th; badlawyersagain; clownshowadmin; contemptofcourt; deathtotraitors; elsalvador; harviewilkinson; illegalimmigration; impeachmentcoming; judicialsedition; judicialtreason; losing; ms13; noauthority; paulaxinis; removalcoming; robertking; stephaniethacker; terrorism; wifebeater
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

1 posted on 04/17/2025 2:59:46 PM PDT by DFG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DFG

Ignore and carry on. Democommies do it without consequence so......


2 posted on 04/17/2025 3:02:22 PM PDT by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this💩? 🚫💉! 🇮🇱👍!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG

Good gosh ... is just about EVERY Repub *Judge* a complete DS RINO, now?


3 posted on 04/17/2025 3:02:27 PM PDT by Jane Long (Jesus is Lord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG

An Appeals Court Judge overruled The Supreme Court?


4 posted on 04/17/2025 3:03:46 PM PDT by Texas Eagle ("Throw me to the wolves and I'll return leading the pack"- Donald J. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG

DOGE has shown that Federal financing is crap. Why should the Courts be otherwise?


5 posted on 04/17/2025 3:04:56 PM PDT by Empire_of_Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG

The Order, as it is to posted and I know people want to read it before posting:

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/25900477/25-1404-ruling.pdf


6 posted on 04/17/2025 3:05:35 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG

A unanimous (3-0) ruling from the Court of Appeals that references a unanimous (9-0) ruling from the USSC.


7 posted on 04/17/2025 3:07:35 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG
"The Executive may succeed for a time in weakening the courts, but over time history will script the tragic gap between what was and all that might have been, and law in time will sign its epitaph"

What century was this flowery nonsense written? Illegal aliens do not belong here and should be deported.



8 posted on 04/17/2025 3:07:56 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG

Hey judges, here’s a big middle finger for ya! Be careful what you wish for.


9 posted on 04/17/2025 3:08:03 PM PDT by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

“Good gosh ... is just about EVERY Repub *Judge* a complete DS RINO, now?”

Trump is looking at the situation with the 1X Mark I Eyeball. But judges are surrounded by “LAWS” and those are in fine, fine print requiring 10X magnification or higher. What you can’t see at the higher magnification is the entire picture. Are these people Trump is throwing out good for the country or bad for the country? I think the judges are trapped in a forest so dense they can’t see the trees. Trump, far above them, can make out the trees just fine. It’s all a matter of perspective.


10 posted on 04/17/2025 3:08:19 PM PDT by Gen.Blather (I had a tagline and I dropped it. The cat back-pawed it under the Barcalounger. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DFG

Just a question: say China (or any other country) sends soldiers over the border but they come dressed in civilian clothes. Some commit crimes like trespassing on sensitive military installations.

Intelligence links said people, finding the group is part of a foreign government or a terrorist organization.

Does every one of them get a court date to see if they can be removed?

Do you have to wait for an official declaration of war before acting on such a threat?


11 posted on 04/17/2025 3:09:30 PM PDT by packagingguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG

>> “The Judiciary will lose much from the constant intimations of its illegitimacy, to which by dent of custom and detachment we can only sparingly reply,” Wilkinson wrote. “The Executive will lose much from a public perception of its lawlessness and all of its attendant contagions. The Executive may succeed for a time in weakening the courts, but over time history will script the tragic gap between what was and all that might have been, and law in time will sign its epitaph.”

Judge? Or arrogant grandstanding drama queen?


12 posted on 04/17/2025 3:10:24 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (Hope, as a righteous product of properly aligned Faith, IS in fact a strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fury

We cannot expect the Judiciary to do anything but protect their own power.

I say this as a lawyer, something has to change. The 4th Circuit in this case duly notes that its legitimacy is at stake. That legitimacy is based on the goodwill of the other branches. The 4th Circuit also arrogantly claims that failure to allow its power grab will adversely affect the legitimacy of the Executive.

What they miss is that the legitimacy of the Executive and Congress is in the hands of the voters.

Scream about the “rule of law” all they want, but if at the end of the day the voters approve of what Trump is doing, the Judiciary has nothing. Then, it is they who would find that their too long tolerated hubris has destroyed their power.


13 posted on 04/17/2025 3:18:48 PM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DFG

WTH is this? The case has already been ruled on the at the SC. Trump has agreed to provide transport if El Salvador wants to send him back. That should be the end of it. The rats/MSM are dying to have the spectacle of the illegal getting off the plane on our soil. That will not have the effect they think it will.


14 posted on 04/17/2025 3:19:48 PM PDT by iamgalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG

Lawlessness?! What kind of BS ruling is this? None of these, so-called, judges lifted a finger when Biden refused to protect the border and let millions of illegals in and then gave them social security numbers and let them vote.

That’s your “lawlessness” plain and simple.

Trump is enforcing the laws, as written and the judges are flaunting that and forcing the executive office to act ILLEGALLY.


15 posted on 04/17/2025 3:20:34 PM PDT by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

Checks and balances means the courts have to be checked as well.


16 posted on 04/17/2025 3:20:49 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DFG

They started with Signal (crickets now) moved to doom and gloom tariffs (crickets again) and now this dude.

Boy, the left can pick ‘em.

And of course a lot of FReepers jerked their knees with them.


17 posted on 04/17/2025 3:21:49 PM PDT by Fledermaus ("It turns out all we really needed was a new President!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG

The President of El Salvador has already said no. Why is that not the end of it?


18 posted on 04/17/2025 3:24:06 PM PDT by packrat35 (Pureblood! No clot shot for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG

We are losing the loud mouth fights!!! and people are listening to the loud mouth fights!!!

We better all get on the loud mouth fights on arrests or we are going to lose people!!!


19 posted on 04/17/2025 3:24:28 PM PDT by sit-rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson

You might as well talk to a wall than him


20 posted on 04/17/2025 3:24:37 PM PDT by Fledermaus ("It turns out all we really needed was a new President!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson