Posted on 04/11/2025 4:44:04 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Sholdon Daniels, who’s running against Jasmine Crockett, went to their house to confirm the contributions AND “THEY HAD NO IDEA WHAT THESE CHARGES WERE” ‼️
INSANE!!! 👇🏼 @SholdonDaniels
Peter Bernegger✓ @PeterBernegger
This is how deep it goes!
@actblue and @winred is just the tip of Smurfing. See how deep it goes right here: there are over 300 other organizations committing Smurfing and they all need to be shutdown.
Democracy Engine positioned itself to take over the role of Actblue. Co-founder of Actblue: Jonathan Zucker. Co-founder of Democracy Engine: Jonathan Zucker.
MoveOn dot org as of Dec 2024 has partnered with The Action Network. Lots of money being laundering by them.
The Fintechs colluding/conspiring with ActBlue, WinRed and the others to make Smuring happen: PayPal, STRIPE, Bills dot com (Divvy Card division), Gift-O-Gram and more! We have the evidence.
Banks colluding/conspiring with Actblue, WinRed and the others to make Smurfing happen: Wells Fargo, Bank of America, Amalgamated Bank Washington DC branch. We have the evidence.
Dirty penny in the pile: Ellen Weintraub. A very corrupt person participating in criminally laundering money, and stealing the identities of elderly senior citizens.
Weintraub has know for YEARS Smurfing has been occuring. She has been a Commissioner with the FEC since 2002.
She used to work for Perkins Coie law firm. She has written letters - on FEC letterhead - denying there is election fraud in our elections. She in fact is covering it up! Smurfing is one method of election fraud.
This is why just this past month the DFC, the DNC and the DCCC all rushed to her defense when President Trump fired her (she is fighting it). She has been covering for these corrupt committees - who also are colluding in Smurfing. Soros' groups are intertwined in these.
As was Pierre Omidyar. Fact: when we came out publicly in 2022-2023 about Smurfing Pierre bolted. He fled from the Smurfing scene!
And Attorney Marc Elias is in on this Smurfing big time, as is Perkins Coie law firm. @PerkinsCoieLLP
You can't setup up organizations to criminally launder billions without attorneys. THEY were/are the attorneys. Remember the GodFather had an attorney? So do the drug cartels. @elonmusk
@immutablechrist @TheTVConsPiracy
Epstein’s clients are.
wow.......that bad.
The use Rico for the mob but they cant use it when it comes to this and other fraudulent corrupt machines?
FEC Opens Probe of Rep. Jasmine Crockett Donations
Fred Lucas | April 10, 2025 | The Daily Signal
Fred Lucas is chief news correspondent and manager of the Investigative Reporting Project for The Daily Signal. He is the author of “The Myth of Voter Suppression: The Left’s Assault on Clean Elections.”
The Federal Election Commission opened an investigation into firebrand Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, regarding donations to her 2024 campaign made through ActBlue, a Democrat fundraising powerhouse organization. The Coolidge-Reagan Foundation, a conservative advocacy group, made the FEC complaint on March 26, as first reported by The Daily Signal. On April 2, the FEC notified the Coolidge-Reagan Foundation it would review the matter and notify Crockett.
“The respondents will be notified of this complaint within five business days,” Wanda D. Brown, the FEC assistant general counsel for complaints examination and legal administration, said in the letter. “You will be notified as soon as the Federal Election Commission (FEC) takes final action on your client’s complaint. Should you receive any additional information in this matter, please forward it to the Office of the General Counsel.” Brown wrote the letter to Dan Backer, a Washington lawyer representing the Coolidge-Reagan Foundation. “The FEC opened an investigation. There is a process, but they are investigating,” Backer told The Daily Signal.
The complaints reference a specific suspect donor reported to have given 53 separate donations totaling $595 to Crockett’s campaign through the ActBlue portal. The suspect donor was a 73-year-old Texas resident named Randy Best, according to the FEC complaint. However, Best’s wife—in a video promoted by one of Crockett’s opponents for 2026, Sholdon Daniels—denied knowing anything about the donations. The complaint contends this possibly means Best—and potentially other donors through ActBlue—did not make the donations listed under their names.
The bigger picture is that Crockett’s campaign received about $870,000 in total donations through ActBlue. The Coolidge-Reagan Foundation’s FEC complaint says. That includes the $595 recorded from Best, who lives in Plano, Texas.
“Rep. Crockett, through her principal campaign committee Respondent Jasmine for US, has received thousands of other donations through ActBlue totaling over $870,000,” the FEC complaint says. “It is unclear how many of these are similarly fraudulent transactions, made in the name of unsuspecting innocent people who did not actually provide the funds.”
ActBlue fundraising has faced questions by congressional Republicans and GOP state attorneys general. In a story cited in the FEC complaint, The Daily Signal previously reported several elderly Americans said they were not aware of ActBlue donations in their name. The next step is for the respondent—Crockett—to have 15 days to respond to the allegations. The FEC historically grants extensions of 30 and 60 days, Backer said.
Crockett is not alone among Democrats getting donations through the ActBlue portal. Republican state attorneys general, as well as the GOP-controlled House Oversight and Accountability Committee, opened an investigation into ActBlue’s fundraising practices.
For its part, ActBlue has consistently said it follows the law, and the attacks are partisan.
The Daily Signal reached out to Crockett’s congressional office, Crockett’s campaign, and to ActBlue with email inquiries. None responded. An FEC spokesperson told The Daily Signal the agency cannot comment on a pending case until the matter is resolved.
“It could be a reasonable defense for Rep. Crockett and other Democrats to say, ‘We didn’t solicit those donations, they all came in from ActBlue,’” Backer said in an interview. “But that would be wilful blindness. The problem is legally, the campaign committee treasurer is responsible for due diligence,” Backer continued. “The treasurer could say, ‘We had absolute confidence in ActBlue.’ But ActBlue has been under investigation by state and federal authorities. That excuse might have worked a year ago.”
ALWAYS follow the money.
And for the love of all that’s sane- stop replacing one damned democrat with another.
Looks like the jive-talkin’ Democrat is in deep deep doo doo.
Crockett received $16,000 in repeated political contributions
from an elderly retired couple who say they did no such thing.
Robert A Cook PE posted that at the FEC level - Democrat worshippers forced through an “individual credit card acceptance rule.” Wherein no TYPED NUMBER, PIN NUMBER, EXP DATE, or VERIFICATION is NEEDED.
All that is necessary is ActBlue’s easily-obtained list of names, card numbers.......
adding amounts to be “donated” which are then falsified on FEC documents as “a donation.”
Jasmine Crockett, through her principal congressional campaign committee, “Respondent Jasmine for US,” has received thousands of donations thru ActBlue totaling over $870,000,” the FEC complaint says.
“It is unclear how many of these are similarly fraudulent transactions, made in the name of unsuspecting innocent people whose names were falsified in Act Blue’s FEC filings, as having contributed but did not actually provide the funds.”
Jasmine and her backdoor racism needs to die on the vine. We’re so beyond that.
kimmonson.com
Wisconsin Center for Election Justice’s Peter Bernegger Uncovers Alleged Election Fraud
Peter Bernegger, founder of the Wisconsin Center for Election Justice, provides an update on his lawsuit against the Colorado Secretary of State. Bernegger states that his team has uncovered over 14,000 fraudulent voters who participated in the 2024 election. His analysis of voter rolls allegedly shows that these ballots should never have been counted. He claims that Secretary of State Jena Griswold and her office allowed these irregularities, which he argues amount to election fraud.
Bernegger explains that his team ran multiple checks on voter data, comparing records before and after the election. He asserts that thousands of ballots were mailed to individuals who were ineligible to vote, including those registered at commercial addresses. He intends to present these findings as part of the ongoing federal lawsuit, which could challenge the state’s voter roll maintenance practices.
Bernegger also discusses “smurfing”, a method of money laundering allegedly used to funnel illegal donations into political campaigns. He claims that elderly individuals’ names and addresses are exploited to hide the origins of massive political donations, often processed through ActBlue and WinRed. He says that both major political parties have been complicit in this practice, calling it a “systematic effort to manipulate campaign finance.”
As the lawsuit progresses, Bernegger expresses confidence that the evidence will demonstrate systemic election fraud in Colorado. He emphasizes that cleaning up voter rolls is critical to ensuring election integrity.
Susan Kochevar on the Epstein Files and Election Records
Business owner Susan Kochevar criticizes former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi for her handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files. Kochevar argues that the documents Bondi recently released contain no new information and were already publicly available. She accuses Bondi of turning the investigation into a spectacle rather than ensuring accountability. Additionally, she questions why Bondi gave the files to specific media outlets and suggests that the delay may have allowed key evidence to be destroyed.
Kochevar also weighs in on election integrity, echoing Bernegger’s concerns about fraudulent voting and record tampering. She draws parallels between these issues and the prosecution of Tina Peters, the former Mesa County Clerk who is serving a nine-year sentence for election-related crimes. Kochevar argues that Peters’ conviction was politically motivated and intended to deter others from investigating election integrity issues.
Explore the full conversation in this episode of the Kim Monson Show.
Click link to read the machine generated transcript with some human editing.
Total contributions 2021-2022:
Jasmine for US PAC to Democrat federal candidates,
To Republicans $0 0.00%
To Democrat House Candidates, 2021-2022-——$22,000 total
Democrat Candidate ......Total Contribution
Nikki Budzinski (D-Ill) $2,000
Don Davis (D-NC) $2,000
Jackie Gordon (D-NY) $2,000
Jevin Hodge (D-Ariz) $2,000
Summer Lee (D-Pa) $2,000
Jennifer Mcclellan (D-Va) $2,000
Hillary Scholten (D-Mich) $2,000
Eric Sorensen (D-Ill) $2,000
Emilia Sykes (D-Ohio) $2,000
Laura Gillen (D-NY) $1,000
Val Hoyle (D-Ore) $1,000
Kermit Jones (D-Calif) $1,000
Brittany Pettersen (D-Colo) $1,000
Ellen Weintraub has been a Commissioner with the FEC since 2002.
She’s in the know about criminal laundering money operations.
ActBlue’s MO is stealing the identities of elderly seniors.
ActBlue’s listed donations sometimes add up to the senior’s entire annual income.
Weintraub has know for YEARS this has been occuring.
<><>she is an FEC commissioner
<><>She used to work for the notorious Perkins Coie law firm.
<><>She has written letters - on FEC letterhead - denying there is election fraud.
<><>She in fact is covering up the modus operandi of ActBlue’s relentless election fraud.
The FEC implemented an “individual credit card acceptance rule” that allows campaigns to accept credit card donations without requiring the donor to enter their card number, expiration date, or verification code. This rule essentially allows campaigns to process donations offline, bypassing the standard electronic authorization process.
The implementation seems to aid and abet ActBlue’s
stealing donors’ identities to enrich Democrat candidates.
The FEC facilitates offline credit card transactions, meaning the donation is processed without the need for a card reader or online payment gateway.
It allows campaigns to accept donations by manually entering an authorization code into a credit card machine, essentially bypassing the usual tokenization process.
This type of transaction is sometimes referred to as a “force sale” or “force-posted transaction”.
The FEC eliminated the need to provide credit card
number, expiration date, or other sensitive info.
The rule offers ActBlue greater flexibility in accepting donations, particularly in situations where they might not have access to traditional payment processing systems.
Potential for Fraud:
While designed for convenience, this system could potentially be exploited by fraudulent individuals, as it bypasses the security measures of online transactions.
In essence, the FEC’s rule allows ActBlue to accept credit card donations without the need for online processing, offering flexibility but also raising some security concerns.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.