Posted on 04/10/2025 12:36:40 AM PDT by UMCRevMom@aol.com
The House of Representatives passed a bill Wednesday to limit federal district judges' ability to affect Trump administration policies on a national scale.
The No Rogue Rulings Act, led by Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., passed the House and limits district courts' power to issue U.S.-wide injunctions, instead forcing them to focus their scope on the parties directly affected in most cases.
All but one Republican lawmaker voted for the bill, which passed 219 to 213. No Democrats voted in favor. The Trump administration has faced more than 15 nationwide injunctions since the Republican commander-in-chief took office, targeting a wide range of President Donald Trump's policies, from birthright citizenship reform to anti-diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) efforts.
Issa himself was confident the bill would pass, telling Fox News Digital on Tuesday morning, "We've got the votes."
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
ARTICLE
COMMITTEE ON RULES
H.R. 1526 - No Rogue Rulings Act of 2025
Hearing Information
https://rules.house.gov/bill/119/hr-1526
Senate amendment to H. Con. Res. 14 - Establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2025 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2026 through 2034.
VIDEO https://rules.house.gov/media/videos/rules-committee-hearing-sa-h-con-res-14
* Rule Information
COMMITTEE ACTION:
REPORTED BY A RECORD VOTE of 9-3 on Wednesday, April 9, 2025.
FLOOR ACTION ON H. RES. 313:
Agreed to by a record vote of 216-215, after agreeing to the previous question by a record vote of 217-212, on Wednesday, April 9, 2025.
MANAGERS: Foxx/McGovern
1. Provides for consideration of the Senate amendment to H. Con. Res. 14.
2. Makes in order a motion offered by the chair of the Committee on the Budget or his designee that the House concur in the Senate amendment to H. Con. Res. 14.
3. Waives all points of order against consideration of the motion.
4. Provides that the Senate amendment and the motion shall be considered as read.
5. Provides one hour of general debate on the motion equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Budget or their respective designees.
6. Provides that each day during the period from April 9, 2025, through September 30, 2025, shall not constitute a calendar day for purposes of section 202 of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622) with respect to a joint resolution terminating a national emergency declared by the President on April 2, 2025.
BTTT
Who was the republican who voted against the bill?
And before any lawyer on this forum complains about my statement and wants to offer contrary opinions, please produce some evidence that "lawyer ethics" is like "normal people ethics."
Lawyer ethics might be acceptable to you if you are a Swamp Creature living in the middle of the Swamp and everybody you know is a Swamp Creature, but outside the Beltway, it looks dirty and corrupt. Now why does it "look" dirty?
What is his problem? A gang friend?
Mike Turner is still fuming about being removed as chair of the House Intel Committee. He is also a voice for the military/industrial complex (not that the MIC has an interest in this bill).
Irrelevant if it doesn’t pass the Senate.
The problem is not that he is like a democrat the problem IS the democrats and their swamp, money money money.
Get rid of the fed. Don’t make politicing pay.
Let’s imagine that it eventually makes it into statue law. All that will happen is that “some judge” will rule it un-Constitutional. The Supremes will agree because they will never approve anything that limits the power of the judiciary. Checks and balances? Not so much.
“(not that the MIC has an interest in this bill).”
I predict they will have their robots in the Senate kill it.
Have you made a connection? I think there is one, but I just can't find it.
bookmark
Judges are getting WAY TOO BIG FOR THEIR ROBES!!
The “Global” NWO/MIC corporations and CIA are behind ALL of the opposition against Trump including these judges. They are still operating in the background no matter who Trump appointed.
And they like to play good cop/bad cop with theater to keep things under control and headed in the right direction by hamstringing or disrupting Trump’s power on everything they can related or not. So this time it is the House’s turn to play good cop, and I predict the Senate will play bad cop and either kill it, or delay it as long as possible.
I suppose at some point I should make a family tree of the true Global power structure so that it is easier to understand how this works and why it is so predictable most of the time.
But in the bigger picture I’m not sure folks are considering the double edged sword here. Something absolutely needs to be done about these crooked judges. But in turn our own conservative values in the past have been saved at the last minute by the very same protocol we are wanting be be rid of here. It is a catch 22 situation that will come into play in the future. But at this point in time something needs to be done for sure...
That would be rich as it is specifically listed in the constitution as a power of congress. Some random Obama judge would very well do it, but not even ACB is dumb enough to try to put that in a supreme court decision.
This bill will be DOA in the Senate.
Well said.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.