Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WHOA. . . District court judge reverses himself and says yup, I do have jurisdiction over these lawsuits against Trump Administration for firings.
X ^ | 3/25/25 | Margot Cleveland

Posted on 03/25/2025 6:24:31 AM PDT by hardspunned

Early on, I followed three recent decisions in other district courts holding that claims brought by public-sector unions concerning federal employee terminations had to be channeled through the Merit Systems Protection Board and/or the Federal Labor Relations Authority and therefore the district court had no subject-matter jurisdiction over those claims, although I accepted subject-matter jurisdiction over claims by the organizational plaintiffs. After further briefing, however, this order holds that the district court does have subject-matter jurisdiction over these claims by public-sector unions and that my earlier ruling to the contrary was mistaken.

(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: altpresidentalsup; williamalsup
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last
Judge William Alsup (Clinton appointee) gotten to.
1 posted on 03/25/2025 6:24:31 AM PDT by hardspunned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

F these liberal fools...


2 posted on 03/25/2025 6:26:52 AM PDT by Democrat = party of treason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

Trump’s Intelligence Community should be quietly scrutinizing the financial records and communications of these judges.


3 posted on 03/25/2025 6:28:57 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

Wow, that’s pretty shocking. Libs don’t usual admit mistakes.


4 posted on 03/25/2025 6:30:02 AM PDT by brownsfan (It's going to take real, serious, hard times to wake the American public.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

“The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions arising under the
Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States.”

yes, they should be able to tell if it is constitutional or not to mediate everything going to the supreme court... but they take it as a way to rule against the constitution...

a holes


5 posted on 03/25/2025 6:31:14 AM PDT by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world or something )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

While the fat a##es on supreme court do nothing, they are compromised


6 posted on 03/25/2025 6:32:15 AM PDT by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

Justice delayed is justice denied. It’s obvious that SCOTUS hasn’t gotten that message yet.


7 posted on 03/25/2025 6:33:04 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Import The Third World,Become The Third World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

And still the Constitution burns while the SCOTUS fiddles.


8 posted on 03/25/2025 6:33:08 AM PDT by TTFlyer (Lenin: that by the infliction of terror, a well-organized minority can conquer a nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

Check cleared.


9 posted on 03/25/2025 6:33:57 AM PDT by Bayard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

Someone had a visit, time for Elon and his gang to start investigating finances and internet activity of these sleaze balls.

Imagine most have passwords of 1234 or QWERTY 😂


10 posted on 03/25/2025 6:34:49 AM PDT by blitz128
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun

“While the fat a##es on supreme court do nothing, they are compromised”

Not all of them, but Roberts for sure, and likely Coney-Barrett.


11 posted on 03/25/2025 6:34:52 AM PDT by brownsfan (It's going to take real, serious, hard times to wake the American public.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan; Liz; LS

No. The opposite actually.

This liberal socially-communist judge said he made “a mistake” when he said that the judges who were issuing pictorial restraining orders against Trump were wrong. Here, in this press release (er, private unofficial confession written in public), this judges saying “It IS LEGAL to write niversal federal restraining orders, as long as they are against Trump.”


12 posted on 03/25/2025 6:35:04 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (Method, motive, and opportunity: No morals, shear madness and hatred by those who cheat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

These characters don’t recognize separation of power


13 posted on 03/25/2025 6:36:43 AM PDT by stanne (Because they were mesmerized by Obama, the man for whom this was named, whose name they left out of )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

The “judiciary” is all the dims have left. Tough nut to crack, but I think investigating them and leveling charges of corruption and more than likely more disgusting behaviors should fix the problem.

Send a few to jail, and theu might change course.


14 posted on 03/25/2025 6:36:54 AM PDT by blitz128
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

Resistance. The judges are leading it.


15 posted on 03/25/2025 6:37:54 AM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan

He got a phone call or a photo in an envelope...


16 posted on 03/25/2025 6:40:12 AM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun

Remember Awan Bros.

That was merely a snapshot of the real scandal.

I bet my life on it.


17 posted on 03/25/2025 6:41:18 AM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

...according to plan...


18 posted on 03/25/2025 6:42:52 AM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

No harm will come to you or your family if you reverse your ruling ...


19 posted on 03/25/2025 6:44:00 AM PDT by Blueflag (To not carry is to choose to be defenseless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

Roberts gave these hacks the green light last week. It has gotten much worse since.


20 posted on 03/25/2025 6:45:25 AM PDT by iamgalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson