Posted on 03/18/2025 11:52:15 AM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 @julie_kelly2
In response to DOJ statement today, Boasberg doubles up on demands for details about deportation flights that left US on Saturday before his nationwide temp restraining order went into effect:
1:33 PM · Mar 18, 2025
(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...
Roberts is TOTALLY CORRUPT.
If Chief Justice Roberts wants to minimize attacks on out of control appointed leftwing district court judges abusing their role and claiming to be able to overrule the elected President of the United States on management details that are clearly within his role as defined by the Constitution and the Federalist Papers then he should intervene and overrule these absurd power grabs.
The Chief Justice can defend the Court by overruling bad judges before the Executive and Legislative Branches start acting against them. The burden is on the Chief Justice not the President.
It probably wasn’t much of a Constitutional Crisis until our favorite Squishy Justice decided to throw fuel on the fire. Thanks alot JR!
Tell this judge to pound sand.
That shathead Roberts has weaponized the judiciary against Americans. We need to get together and start petitioning to get Roberts’ cowardly and treasonous ass thrown out.
Gingrich is right. It’s common sense for Christ sake.
Boasberg has a daughter involved in monetizing illegal alien activity, so I heard.
Roberts has a skeleton in his closet regarding the adoption of his two children.
Gill-ty
The DemonRATS and their Supreme Court is the greatest danger to America. They are currently in the process of destroying the country and eliminating Americans.
Good for Newt to chime in with the facts.
There have been 127 (and counting) federal bench injunctions since Trump took office.
Maybe he’ll be gone if the Epstein crap is ever released.
So, if a Federal judge for Texas says it is okay to ignore this DC idiot, then what?
Good. Because this crap is never going to end unless and until Trump takes it to the court of appeals and/or makes an emergency appeal to Scotus.
I know it’s fashionable on FR to bash Roberts and I don’t like him either, but that doesn’t mean what he said was wrong. In fact it is correct - there have been countless thousands of bad decisions by federal judges over the years but only 15 times has one been impeached and only 8 of those were convicted by the Senate. Impeachment is for treason, accepting bribes, and other high crimes. It is not the remedy for decisions that violate the constitution - that’s what the judicial system is for.
The ability of federal judges to issue nationwide injunctions has never been tested in court at least not at Scotus, and that’s what must happen. Hopefully soon.
Come back when all this is behind us and I’m sure what I wrote above will have been proven to be right. I can’t predict what Scotus will decide but I’m certain these Trump-hating activist judges will continue to exercise what they think is their rightful authority until someone from a higher court tells them they cannot.
Bear in mind, our side used the same power to stop DACA when Obama was President.
Unfortunately, the corrupted mix of Justices we have will NOT do their Constitutional-based duty, and will vote with their Political bias.
I’ve seen his demands. What I haven’t seen is the citation of law. What law is the judge citing that says the entire Executive Branch has to follow his personal directives?
Roberts comments won’t stop impeachment proceedings
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.