Posted on 03/07/2025 7:47:20 AM PST by artichokegrower
California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s latest public blunder — inviting right wing troll Charlie Kirk to be the first guest on his new podcast — is merely the latest pairing of two mediocre white men who think their conversations are interesting enough to be recorded.
(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...
I don’t think she likes men
Racist. Do I even need to look?
I’m pretty sure he has reached his pinnacle. All downhill from here.
Nothing wrong with podcasts, in and of themselves. Rooseveldt had his equivalent of a podcast. I would love it if Trump held an hour podcast, once a week, to address whatever the issue is at the time.
But I’d also want him to be demonstratably busy in solving the problems as well.
I looked. White apologist racist, even worse.
Or a mediocre black man.
You’re right. The Peter Principal is on display with this joker.
I can’t even imagine how there isn’t a lynch mob for Newsom and that awful Mayor of theirs after they did nothing to prevent those fires that burned down the Pacific Palisades.
What are they doing to prevent more of that? Summer’s are notorious for fires and prevention actions take quite some time.
She is just another fat, white, virtue-signaling Karen. Here is the blumpkin.
The only reason I looked and am sharing it is because I'm a masochist that likes sharing misery.
We are watching 2028 go up in flames. It glorious!
He needs to do something before Bass fires his butt too.
We are watching 2028 go up in flames. It glorious!
The solution? Governor Harris!
Why do woke middle aged white women hate white men? Were their daddy’s not around or too strict with them?
Was growing up in the 60s and 70s in white suburbs too safe and comfortable?
I know a few women like this. I told them, how do you think this plays with your own white children? or white brothers and relatives? They learned to STFU on this topic when around me.
BUMP!
There were nine comments on the article and 80%. We’re not kind to the journalist.
“Does the headline violate Community Guidelines with a personal gender attack? Is that followed by another attack emphasizing the men’s gender and color? Or, is that approved while any comments using the SAME descriptive language are not”
“Without racial and gender identity issues plus a deep hatred of all things normal, the Dem party offers nothing to the country.”
“This is the attitude and message that will ensure a decade of national Republican/MAGA-style rule.”
“Dear Robin Epley, I do not feel informed by your article. I do not know what the two men discussed, which facts or opinions were noteworthy, or which facts were misrepresented. I am sorry, as journalist, you should write better than the average anonymous person on the internet. I am genuinely disinterested of whether you like these two men or not, but what they were discussing. In general, I find it more interesting if two persons from opposite points of view than discussions within an echo chamber. Liberals should be better than just shouting and yelling. Unfortunately, that’s what you did. So sorry for you, I thought you aspired to be a journalist?”
“This article is 100% spot on. Thank you for writing what many of us have been thinking.”
“A few leftists have been thinking in your group think”
“What a RACIST article.”
He thinks hes fooling people, he is not! hes a greasy weasel that can never be trusted
LOL, blumpkin.....
Is she one of these people, for whom a liberal such as Newsom, just isn’t liberal enough to suit her?
And is she pissed off? Because white men such as Newsom are at the bottom of the hierarchy of victimology of the liberals?
Good looking Karens are irritating.
Fat and ugly Karens are despicable.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.