Posted on 03/03/2025 9:35:29 AM PST by 1Old Pro
RFK Jr. illuminates the roots of the Ukraine conflict and America’s long-term involvement at RiskOn360’s Global Success Conference. Mr. Kennedy clarifies why he believes the U.S. must strive to end the bloodshed, rather than perpetuating the war.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtu.be ...
One big error - Aegis missile systems (AEGIS is actually the modern phased array RADAR/control system, originally from the USN. You can see it as the big flat plates on Ticonderoga and Arleigh Burke ships) is for intercepting ICBM’s and cruise missiles, not for launching nuclear missiles. RFK has that precisely backwards.
This was the DemocRATS’ War and was Pedo Joe’s way of taking the spotlight off the invasion of the United State by foreign invaders.
Of course it was.
Thanks. That’s helpful for those of us who haven’t followed the previous history.
Yes, this is all true.
But given what recent events show us, it appears to me, at its most fundamental level - this war was the project of London-Brussels/WEF/EU globohomo-socialists
Certainly, they had a willing (and controlled) long-term partner in the US DC uniparty and deep state
But this may have been a EU-directed project
Excellent synopsis by RFK and contains all of the FACTS that the Zeepers PURPOSEFULLY leave out or call them Russian Propaganda when you present them!
Bravo!
Could be, with willing American Democrats.
Yes, another good synopsis
“Excellent synopsis by RFK and contains all of the FACTS that the Zeepers PURPOSEFULLY leave out or call them Russian Propaganda when you present them!”
Which leads to the question of “why”. Why do they INSIST that we must believe their re-write of history, particularly since it totally supports the GLOBALIST/DNC/Neocon re-write and those people aren’t why we have this site?
Maybe I just answered it?
Thanks.
Worth the watch and even re-watch more than a couple of times.
Also worth some verification.... somehow.
Nobody over there trusts anybody else and probably should not.
Yep, and that’s just what we know.
Agree with the technical differences between systems that can launch nuke missiles being different from launch interceptors. However, if I was Russia I'd be uncomfortable with having to always make sure that the interceptors sitting next door didn't get new nuke launching capability. Also with Russia unable to set interceptors next to us, they'd lose some of their MAD.
NATO expansion was the effect of relentless pressure by, mostly, the Polish government and others. Gorbachev didn’t think of this. Nobody figured on the immense fear and resentment of those ex-Warsaw Pact people. They demanded “never again”. A failure to understand humanity, which we see right here.
“Mr. Kennedy clarifies why he believes the U.S. must strive to end the bloodshed, rather than perpetuating the war.”
So he’s in agreement with his boss, which usually is a good thing.
It doesn’t take much in visible radars - or any at all - to launch nuclear weapons. You can hide cruise missile launchers in the bushes. Its one of those annoying divergences - its way easier, technologically, to attack than defend.
They would lose some of their MAD, yes.
Bkmk
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.