Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Christian Nationalist Plot to Disenfranchise Women Voters { particularly mendacious }
The New Republic ^ | February 21, 2025 | Sarah Stankorb

Posted on 02/25/2025 8:37:56 AM PST by Salman

... The rumors are true: The proposed Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, or SAVE Act, now considered a priority for Republicans in the House, will make it harder, if not practically impossible, for millions of women to vote. The SAVE Act would require documentation, such as a passport or birth certificate matching your current legal name to allow a person to register to vote. These requirements would pose a challenge to broad swaths of the country, but would fall especially hard on women. ...

(Excerpt) Read more at newrepublic.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
Synopsis: Getting rid of voter fraud is a "Christian Nationalist" plot to enslave women.

Analysis: I speculate that means they realized the race card wasn't doing the trick.

1 posted on 02/25/2025 8:37:56 AM PST by Salman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Salman

Phew what a load of BS.


2 posted on 02/25/2025 8:41:25 AM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salman

And how do these millions of American women prove who they are, now? Apparently women are the new minority and the left is telling them they are just too stupid to be able to get the required ID.


3 posted on 02/25/2025 8:42:09 AM PST by Mastador1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salman

1. MOST AMERICANS DO NOT HAVE A PASSPORT

2. WOMEN GET MARRIED-—DIVORCED—REMARRIED, etc. BIRTH CERT IS ONLY IN MAIDEN NAME.

THIS MAKES NO SENSE AT ALL.


4 posted on 02/25/2025 8:42:11 AM PST by ridesthemiles (not giving up on TRUMP---EVER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salman

This is really scared tactics. I marriage license documents a name change. Other court documents provide proof of name change for other reasons. I used my marriage license to revise my driver’s license and passport.


5 posted on 02/25/2025 8:42:34 AM PST by vaskypilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

Very patronizing article. If I were a woman, I’d be insulted by this demeaning drivel.


6 posted on 02/25/2025 8:45:50 AM PST by sjmjax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

The article gives examples. I expect documents for a name change are fine. With Real ID, a driver’s license should suffice.


7 posted on 02/25/2025 8:46:13 AM PST by vaskypilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mastador1

The problem is a lot of women constantly change their hair color and change up their cosmetics, so it’s impossible to know who they really are.


8 posted on 02/25/2025 8:46:35 AM PST by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sjmjax

As a woman, I am insulted.


9 posted on 02/25/2025 8:46:46 AM PST by vaskypilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

When you go through a name-change process you get a social security card with your social security number and your current legal name. It can’t be that hard for the database to be searched and verify these things. Requiring documents is only necessary because they won’t let voter registrations be checked against citizenship records. OK, if they want to make it hard we can make it hard. OR they can just let voter registrations be checked against citizenship records. We can do this the hard way or the easy way, but if the bureaucrats, judges, and leftists (but I repeat myself) choose the hard way they best not complain that it’s hard.


10 posted on 02/25/2025 8:47:05 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Salman

Amazingly I’ve never been invited to supposed “Christian nationalist” meetings. LOL


11 posted on 02/25/2025 8:47:36 AM PST by Tell It Right (1 Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

Manufactured crisis.


12 posted on 02/25/2025 8:48:45 AM PST by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

I should add that they won’t let voter registrations be checked against citizenship records FOR FEDERAL ELECTIONS. In Arizona, for instance, state elections require verification against citizenship records. But judges wouldn’t allow the same requirement to vote in federal elections because the Motor Voter Law (Help America Vote Act) didn’t include that provision. As a result, a LOT more people were allowed to vote in the federal election than in the state election because all those who wouldn’t let the system check their citizenship were allowed to vote.


13 posted on 02/25/2025 8:53:52 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

This is the end of civilization as we know it./sarc


14 posted on 02/25/2025 8:55:32 AM PST by Colt1851Navy (What was wrong with Nixon?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Salman

The problem for Chicken Little was that he or she was ahead of the times. He or she would have had a far more receptive audience today.


15 posted on 02/25/2025 8:58:08 AM PST by RobinOfKingston (Democrats would rather rule in Hell than be governed in Heaven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

bkmk


16 posted on 02/25/2025 9:05:27 AM PST by sauropod (Make sure Satan has to climb over a lot of Scripture to get to you. John MacArthur Ne supra crepidam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

“ As a result, a LOT more people were allowed to vote in the federal election than in the state election because all those who wouldn’t let the system check their citizenship were allowed to vote.”

Find that list of people, and deport every single illegal.


17 posted on 02/25/2025 9:11:13 AM PST by SauronOfMordor (Either you will rule. Or you will be ruled. There is no other choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Salman

I would gladly give up my right to vote if it meant no woman could ever vote again. My husband always uses my sample ballot to vote from anyway (he’s too busy working to spend the time on sample ballots). Repeal the 19th!!


18 posted on 02/25/2025 9:16:28 AM PST by lkco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

A marriage certificate and if divorced a divorce certificate.


19 posted on 02/25/2025 9:29:31 AM PST by Mercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Salman

What an ignorant ninny. A woman who changed her name upon marriage already has to prove the name change when applying for certain documents even if she was married decades ago. Usually a certified copy of the marriage certificate suffices. How long it takes to get a copy depends on the clerk where the certificate is filed.

It really will not be a bar to women voting if such is needed to get a ID suitable to use at the polls.

Oh and a woman does not have to legally change her surname when she marries. I didn’t.


20 posted on 02/25/2025 10:05:37 AM PST by lastchance (Cognovit Dominus qui sunt eius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson