Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court pauses Trump administration's effort to fire head of whistleblower protection agency
Fox News ^ | February 21, 2025 9:07pm EST | Louis Casiano

Posted on 02/21/2025 9:22:36 PM PST by TexasGunLover

Hampton Dellinger, the head of the Office of Special Counsel, was appointed by former President Joe Biden

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday paused the Trump administration's efforts to dismiss the head of an independent agency charged with investigating whistleblower claims as the president seeks to remake the federal government.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government
KEYWORDS: dellinger; doge; hamptondellinger; scotus; seanspicer; spicer; supremecourt; trump

1 posted on 02/21/2025 9:22:36 PM PST by TexasGunLover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TexasGunLover
Myers v. United States in 1926 was a Supreme Court decision ruling that the President has the power to remove executive branch officials, and does not need the approval of the Senate or any other legislative body. The ruling was later upheld in 1935 by Humphrey's Executor v. United States.

2 posted on 02/21/2025 9:31:07 PM PST by Right_Wing_Madman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGunLover

“allowing Hampton Dellinger to remain in the job through at least the middle of next week.”


3 posted on 02/21/2025 9:35:46 PM PST by kiryandil (No one in AZ that voted for Trump voted for Gallego )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGunLover

Spicer v Biden, 2021

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60417526/spicer-v-biden/

Dabney Langhorne Friedrich


4 posted on 02/21/2025 9:37:26 PM PST by kiryandil (No one in AZ that voted for Trump voted for Gallego )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right_Wing_Madman

Yeah, the Gaslight Media is out celebrating this tonight.

It’s still unclear what exactly went down.


5 posted on 02/21/2025 9:41:24 PM PST by kiryandil (No one in AZ that voted for Trump voted for Gallego )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

They put a pause UNTIL THEY HEAR THE CASE.

Not an usual action.


6 posted on 02/21/2025 9:46:31 PM PST by Pikachu_Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TexasGunLover

I hear the Constitutional Crisis engines warming up.

That may sound extreme but not to me.


7 posted on 02/21/2025 9:51:04 PM PST by Sequoyah101 (Donald John Trump. First man to be Elected to the Presidency THREE times since FDR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGunLover

So the Supremes are just asking for time to find their shoes and car keys.


8 posted on 02/21/2025 9:52:03 PM PST by lurk (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad

Thanks!


9 posted on 02/21/2025 9:55:24 PM PST by kiryandil (No one in AZ that voted for Trump voted for Gallego )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TexasGunLover

It appears all the death threats from the DemonRAT chimps have scared the bejeezus out of the Supreme Court now.


10 posted on 02/21/2025 10:08:19 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Cartel Human Smuggling Into America IS NOT Immigration. It's a crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGunLover

Supreme Court sidesteps Trump’s effort to remove watchdog agency head

https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/02/supreme-court-sidesteps-trumps-effort-to-remove-watchdog-agency-head/

“In a brief order, the court on the one hand noted the Trump administration’s concession that the Supreme Court “typically does not have appellate jurisdiction over” temporary restraining orders. On the other hand, it observed, Dellinger emphasized that the temporary restraining order “is set to expire on February 26,” when Jackson has scheduled a hearing on his motion for a preliminary injunction. Taking both of those factors into consideration, the court placed the government’s request on hold until Feb. 26.

In a three-page opinion, Gorsuch (joined by Alito) suggested that the court’s decision not to act on the government’s request at this time reflected “a concern that the TRO may not yet have ripened into an appealable order.” In Gorsuch’s view, however, it had. Gorsuch questioned whether Jackson had the power to order Dellinger’s reinstatement, because courts would not have had the power to do so in early U.S. history.”


11 posted on 02/22/2025 1:12:32 AM PST by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW
Gorsuch questioned whether Jackson had the power to order Dellinger’s reinstatement, because courts would not have had the power to do so in early U.S. history.”

This is EXACTLY what happened in early U.S. history.

In 1801, President John Adams tried to place Federalist members into Thomas Jefferson's Democrat-Republican administration two days before Jefferson's inauguration as President. Adams nominated Willam Marbury to be Justice of the Peace (along with five other people) and got the Senate to rush confirmation. Adams signed the commission and Secretary of State John Marshall affixed the Seal of the United States onto it. The commission was signed and sealed, just not delivered to Marbury.

Incoming Secretary of State James Madison refused to deliver the commission to Marbury and declared the office vacant so that President Jefferson could nominate a Democrat-Republican to the position instead.

Marbury sued Madison, claiming that the office was rightfully his.

Now we have Joe Biden appointing Dellinger to a five-year position in the Trump administration in Biden's last year, and President Trump wants his own person in that position.

In 1803, now Chief Justice Marshall ruled that Madison committed a crime when withholding Marbury's commission, but that Marbury couldn't bring his suit to the Supreme Court because Congress unconstitutionally gave the Supreme Court original jurisdiction for issuing writs of mandamus, which is an appellate function.

Now we have SCOTUS reviewing the law that Congresses passed tying the hands of the President to prevent firing certain officers.

In 1803, Marshall said that SCOTUS didn't have the authority to intrude on Executive branch discretionary powers. In 2025, the District Courts say that they do.

In 1803, Marshall said that Congress didn't have the authority to expand SCOTUS's original jurisdiction. In 2025, will they say that Congress DOES have the authority to restrict the Executive's jurisdiction?

-PJ

12 posted on 02/22/2025 1:52:36 AM PST by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

” ... This is EXACTLY what happened in early U.S. history ... “

Excellent post. Thank you.


13 posted on 02/22/2025 3:15:23 AM PST by KingLudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TexasGunLover

Job performance problem.

His new boss just said he didn’t do his job. He didn’t protect and foster any of the Biden whistleblowers. He allowed them to be attacked by the Biden administration. To many examples the last 4 years to cite.

Absolutely should be fired after the damage done to the Whistleblowers in the DOJ, FBI, IRS who complained about the Biden’s.


14 posted on 02/22/2025 3:57:45 AM PST by Pete Dovgan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGunLover

Send him to the coldest part of Alaska on special assignment


15 posted on 02/22/2025 4:51:54 AM PST by God luvs America (6young 3.5 million pay no income tax and vote for DemoKrats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pete Dovgan

Well said.


16 posted on 02/22/2025 8:03:32 AM PST by Mr. N. Wolfe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TexasGunLover

Its a week so I’ll withhold comment til then.


17 posted on 02/22/2025 8:12:31 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGunLover

ALL Biden holdovers must be fired, so they cannot wreak behind-the-scenes havoc to be blamed on Trump!


18 posted on 02/28/2025 10:17:44 AM PST by JimRed (TERM LIMITS, NOW! Finish the damned WALL! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGunLover

Fifth Circuit just entered stay pending appeal giving effect to Trump’s removal of Dellinger!!

link below:

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cadc.41805/gov.uscourts.cadc.41805.01208717085.0.pdf


19 posted on 03/05/2025 3:36:42 PM PST by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson