Skip to comments.
US District Judge Chutkan has REJECTED an effort to block Elon Musk and DOGE from accessing government systems, and facilitating mass firings across the government
X ^
| 2/17/25
| Nick Sortor
Posted on 02/17/2025 11:43:13 AM PST by hardspunned
Another MASSIVE win for the Trump administration!
Judge Chutkan says the Democrat states have FAILED to provide adequate evidence to block DOGE’s efforts, adding “I'm not seeing it so far.”
Keep in mind, Chutkan is a VERY anti-Trump judge, so the fact she can’t even see the legal path to block Musk & DOGE should be very telling.
(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: chutkan; doge; judgewatch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
The specter of jail time is beginning to haunt these hacks.
To: hardspunned
2
posted on
02/17/2025 11:44:17 AM PST
by
linMcHlp
To: hardspunned
Yes, that does tend to focus their mind.
3
posted on
02/17/2025 11:44:29 AM PST
by
curious7
To: curious7
Seems out of character for her the last four years.
To: hardspunned
She (Judge Chutkan) was also feeling the heat since she heard arguments on a Federal Holiday when the courts are normally closed.
What was it that Reagan said? “Make them feel the heat until they see the light”?
5
posted on
02/17/2025 11:46:27 AM PST
by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /Sarc tag really necessary? Pray for President Biden: Psalm 109:8)
To: hardspunned
An answer to prayer! Thank You LORD!
To: hardspunned
What is everyone’s opinion about the conflict of interest charges against Musk?
7
posted on
02/17/2025 11:47:23 AM PST
by
Lizavetta
To: hardspunned
Will the court jester “ chuckie Schumer “. Make an appearance proclaiming we are winning as many did on the Sunday shows
8
posted on
02/17/2025 11:49:34 AM PST
by
patriotspride
(Third generation Vet. Never forget the true cost of freedom)
To: hardspunned
9
posted on
02/17/2025 11:49:59 AM PST
by
Bobalu
(I can’t even feign surprise anymore...)
To: Lizavetta
“What is everyone’s opinion about the conflict of interest charges against Musk?”
Not a place I’d go if I were the average, conflicted interest SH*tocrat.
10
posted on
02/17/2025 11:50:25 AM PST
by
Fai Mao
(The US government is run by pedophiles and Perverts for pedophiles and perverts.)
To: Lizavetta
My opinion is that there are no conflicts of interest because Musk is not making executive decisions. He's only leading thee audit staff. The staff itself is embedded within each department, and the heads of those departments are making the decisions.
Consider this:
President Trump thought this through. From the Executive Order, every DOGE team has the following personnel:
(c) DOGE Teams. In consultation with USDS, each Agency Head shall establish within their respective Agencies a DOGE Team of at least four employees, which may include Special Government Employees, hired or assigned within thirty days of the date of this Order. Agency Heads shall select the DOGE Team members in consultation with the USDS Administrator. Each DOGE Team will typically include one DOGE Team Lead, one engineer, one human resources specialist, and one attorney. Agency Heads shall ensure that DOGE Team Leads coordinate their work with USDS and advise their respective Agency Heads on implementing the President ‘s DOGE Agenda. |
Key takeaways:
- Each Agency Head picks the DOGE team, not Musk or President Trump.
- Each team has a lawyer and an HR representative on the team to ensure proper compliance with the law.
- DOGE Team Leaders advise the Agency Head and Musk of their findings.
- The Agency Head issues the actions to be taken based on the DOGE Team's findings, not Musk.
Everything that's being done is being done by the book, with oversight and proper authorities involved.
-PJ
11
posted on
02/17/2025 11:50:36 AM PST
by
Political Junkie Too
( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
To: hardspunned
Wow even that corrupt judge saw the light
To: Lizavetta
Musk is the wealthiest human on the planet.
That may help answer your question.
13
posted on
02/17/2025 11:51:34 AM PST
by
cgbg
(The Democrat Party is a criminal enterprise.)
To: hardspunned
Exactly! The threat of sterilization works!!!
14
posted on
02/17/2025 11:57:37 AM PST
by
DarthVader
(Not by speeches & majority decisions will the great issues of the day be decided but by Blood & Iron)
To: Lizavetta
I’m terrified that the $400Billion man is going to steal grandma’s Social Security.
I’d suggest you use a “sarc” when appropriate.
15
posted on
02/17/2025 12:03:34 PM PST
by
hardspunned
(Look for the“Putin Stooge” libel, news from Ukraine you’ve gradually grown to trust over 30 months )
To: Sarah Barracuda
I doubt it’s that. When it comes to these corrupt judges making a decision in our favor, one has to ask,
”Cui bono?” In this case, what’s the ramifications that, if she let it go through, and it winds up in SCOTUS and they overturned it? Seems to me that would present a far larger hurdle to jump over at a later date when the benefit to their side would be on the other foot.
No, I think this is just a calculated play to keep this out of SCOTUS, knowing they will lose that battle, until SCOTUS more favors their side. Yes, it means taking a loss now. But I bet they’re planning for another move on down the road from now (if they can maneuver themselves into a position to make it).
To: hardspunned
Be Aware: Judge Shipcan HAS NOT ruled on this matter yet
17
posted on
02/17/2025 12:06:50 PM PST
by
jpp113
To: hardspunned
I thought she refused to rule outright and said she would rule within 24 hours.
I think it is too much to hope to think Judge Chutkan will rule in favor of Trump or anyone on his team.
18
posted on
02/17/2025 12:07:38 PM PST
by
CFW
To block DOGE is to set the precedent that all funding allocated by the federal government is permanent and can never be cut or the states will be harmed.
Those AGs should be voted out. They are wasting the court's time and abusing taxpayer funds.
19
posted on
02/17/2025 12:08:05 PM PST
by
TornadoAlley3
( I'm Proud To Be An Okie From Muskogee)
To: hardspunned
She hasn’t ruled on the TRO yet. My understanding is she hasn’t seen anything that can let her grant a TRO. Doesn’t mean it won’t happen.
20
posted on
02/17/2025 12:08:28 PM PST
by
EQAndyBuzz
(Privatize the administrative state!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson