Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge weighs interim ban on Elon Musk's DOGE accessing the financial data of millions of Americans
Business Insider ^ | Feb 5, 2025 | Laura Italiano

Posted on 02/05/2025 5:23:26 PM PST by MinorityRepublican

A federal judge said Wednesday that she may immediately block the Treasury Department from directly sharing the personal financial data of millions of Americans with Elon Musk's DOGE.

US District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, who sits in Washington, DC., made the announcement after an hourlong court hearing, during which a government lawyer said only two Musk allies — both of them now Treasury employees — have any access to the data.

That contention was met with skepticism from one of the lawyers seeking to ensure the data's privacy.

"We remain concerned that the records — the personal information of our association's members — are still compromised," said the lawyer, Nandan Joshi, who represents three unions in a lawsuit against Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent filed on Monday.

"If there's a compromise, it's impossible to unbreak the egg," Joshi said.

Treasury officials have not been forthcoming on what access the two Musk allies have to the data, Joshi told the judge. The two were identified in court as Cloud Software Group CEO Tom Krause and Marko Elez, who has worked at SpaceX and X, formerly Twitter.

"We don't take it as a given that two individuals by themselves, without outside assistance, will manage the supposed task of rooting out fraud, waste, and abuse in a system that handles over a billion payments a year, and trillions and trillions of dollars of payments," he said.

The lawyer representing Bessent and the Treasury Department, Bradley P. Humphreys, countered during the hearing that only Elez has direct access to the data, and that "he briefs and reports to Mr. Krause, who does not have direct access."

"Only those two individuals have been given any access," Humphreys said, adding that as special government employees of the Treasury Department, both are subject to federal ethics and confidentiality requirements.

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 0classonfr; abortionistjudge; chuckb87; chuckbrainless87; clintonstooge; colleenkollarkotelly; enemieslist; enemyjudge; executive; frpottymouths; judgewatch; judiciary; kollarkotelly; lawfare; mabarker1; mabarkingbuffoon; mabarkslikeadog; politicaljudiciary; treasurydepartment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

1 posted on 02/05/2025 5:23:26 PM PST by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Appoint an IG and tell her to soak her fucking head.


2 posted on 02/05/2025 5:25:18 PM PST by chuckb87
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Whoa whoa whoa... it’s not YOUR DATA.

It’s OUR DATA.


3 posted on 02/05/2025 5:25:38 PM PST by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Not her purview. Not her job.


4 posted on 02/05/2025 5:25:46 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Back off, Colleen.


5 posted on 02/05/2025 5:27:14 PM PST by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Immediate appeal.


6 posted on 02/05/2025 5:27:39 PM PST by MNJohnnie (Don't blame me, my congressman is MTG!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Bull$}{!T !!! They’re worried about getting their A$$€$ caught up in the FRAUD THAT IS RAMPANT.

Musk could care less about the average citizen and their $$$. He’s helping to DRAIN THE SWAMP!!!


7 posted on 02/05/2025 5:28:19 PM PST by mabarker1 ( (Congress- the opposite of PROGRESS!!! A fraud, a hypocrite, a liar. I'm a member of Congress!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

Yep, this is an executive branch issue, separation of powers, she has no authority whatsoever.


8 posted on 02/05/2025 5:28:28 PM PST by Skwor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

We need to find out which judges are on the take too.


9 posted on 02/05/2025 5:28:34 PM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Immediate appeal.

And tie it up in the court system for the next four years?

10 posted on 02/05/2025 5:28:45 PM PST by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Judge wants to aid and abet a fraudulent agency.


11 posted on 02/05/2025 5:29:38 PM PST by grumpygresh ( Civil disobedience by non-compliance; jury and state nullification.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

So the President of the US cannot have access to information in one of his departments?


12 posted on 02/05/2025 5:29:44 PM PST by gitmo (If your theology doesn’t become your biography, what good is it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

It should be pretty simple. Either there is an act of Congress that explicitly prohibits access, or there isn’t.


13 posted on 02/05/2025 5:30:07 PM PST by henkster ("The masses are too stupid to understand our enlightened leadership" said every Marxist ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

tell her she has no standing ...


14 posted on 02/05/2025 5:31:20 PM PST by bankwalker (Repeal the 19th ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

This judge was appointed by Clinton.
Hillary probably threatened her with Arkancide.


15 posted on 02/05/2025 5:31:41 PM PST by doc maverick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
It's not Elon Musk per se that is accessing those records - it's him AS THE REPRESENTATIVE of Donald J. Trump, who holds ALL executive power in our Constitutional structure.

Maybe what's needed is to make the DOGE boys deputy US Marshals.

16 posted on 02/05/2025 5:31:55 PM PST by Jim Noble (Assez de mensonges et de phrases)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

It’s not the millions Coleen’s worried about. It’s the HRC’s in immediate danger she’s trying to protect.


17 posted on 02/05/2025 5:32:51 PM PST by Track9 (Make haste slowly. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
"We don't take it as a given that two individuals by themselves, without outside assistance, will manage the supposed task of rooting out fraud, waste, and abuse in a system that handles over a billion payments a year, and trillions and trillions of dollars of payments," he said.

That is intellectually incoherent. They can't access all the data but they have to be prevented from accessing the data? This argument basically wants us to believe that the Executive Branch can never audit anything the Executive branch does because it would put privacy data at risk.

18 posted on 02/05/2025 5:33:49 PM PST by MNJohnnie (Don't blame me, my congressman is MTG!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Yes, because if she issues an injunction it stops the process from moving forward. Rather then let the Alt Left stop everything by Court order you immediately take it away form their tame DC Judge to a higher court


19 posted on 02/05/2025 5:35:39 PM PST by MNJohnnie (Don't blame me, my congressman is MTG!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mabarker1

“They’re worried about getting their A$$€$ caught up in the FRAUD”

It’s cute that they think they’re not ALREADY caught.

This info wouldn’t have been released until ALL the data had been captured and safely stashed away.


20 posted on 02/05/2025 5:35:39 PM PST by MayflowerMadam (It's hard not to celebrate the fall of bad people. - Bongino and)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson