Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Albany Dems look to keep Elise Stefanik’s critical NY House seat vacant in effort to thwart Trump
NY Post ^ | 2/01/25 | Jon Levine

Posted on 02/01/2025 12:05:05 PM PST by Libloather

Albany lawmakers are plotting to keep a critical House seat vacant until June or even later in an effort to thwart President Trump’s legislative agenda.

Lawmakers from both the state Assembly and Senate met Friday to discuss changes to the state’s election law that would allow the governor to delay special elections and push off any pending ones until the June primaries — or even the general election in November.

The dead-of-night discussions ostensibly were about how to save time and money by consolidating elections into a single day — but in actual fact appear targeted at the soon-to-be vacated seat of GOP Rep. Elise Stefanik.

Stefanik — who Trump tapped to be the US Ambassador to the United Nations — is expected to resign her seat to take up the post in the coming days. The vacancy will create headaches for House Republicans who are already struggling to manage a razor-thin majority stocked with frequently unwieldy members.

Stefanik’s district is in deep red north country and she would almost certainly be replaced by another Republican in a special election.

Under the current law, when Stefanik officially resigns, Gov. Hochul must declare a special election within 10 days and the election must take place 80 to 90 days after that declaration.

The Democratic-dominated state legislature, however, could rewrite the rules.

Minority Republicans have little power in either chamber.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: democrats; democratsvsdemocracy; house; newyork; ny; stefanik
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
Progressives - always going backwards.
1 posted on 02/01/2025 12:05:05 PM PST by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather

The only way to protect Our Democracy™ is by preventing the people from voting for their representative.


2 posted on 02/01/2025 12:07:45 PM PST by KarlInOhio (“Forget it, Jake. It's California.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

3 posted on 02/01/2025 12:08:22 PM PST by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

She could thwart them by not resigning; turning down the post to which she was appointed?


4 posted on 02/01/2025 12:08:42 PM PST by jackibutterfly ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I don’t know the law on such matters, but the Republicans would have a good case in the underlying equities if Stefanik resigned before any such change. Her resignation would trigger an automatic timetable under existing law. A subsequent action by the legislative would be a retroactive intervention in an election already in process. That should be a big no no.

And this time around, the democrats don’t have the “because covid” excuse to deem it an emergency situation.


5 posted on 02/01/2025 12:10:18 PM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jackibutterfly

That would make sense at this point.


6 posted on 02/01/2025 12:14:04 PM PST by rbg81 (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Those Democrats really love democracy!


7 posted on 02/01/2025 12:14:05 PM PST by Ge0ffrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

No- always working the corners. If they don’t like the rules they ignore or abolish the rules


8 posted on 02/01/2025 12:15:15 PM PST by j.havenfarm (24 years on Free Republic, 12/10/24! More than 10,500 replies and still not shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

there is that democracy

they are always yapping about


9 posted on 02/01/2025 12:15:43 PM PST by joshua c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

Trump’s appointments leave valuable seats exposed but you don’t want to disqualify good talent he wishes to appoint.

Perhaps the senate model might work where the governor is REQUIRED to appoint someone of the leaving members’ party to the seat. The empty seat party’s bigwigs could decide on 2-3 candidates.


10 posted on 02/01/2025 12:18:43 PM PST by DIRTYSECRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

Thank you.


11 posted on 02/01/2025 12:24:22 PM PST by jackibutterfly ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I wonder if there is any law against her being both U.S. Ambassador and a U.S. Representative at the same time? If not, just don’t resign and hold both positions.


12 posted on 02/01/2025 12:27:30 PM PST by Engraved-on-His-hands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Why should she resign? Many people hold two jobs. She could hold the two jobs until the special election is held in NYS.

All she needs to do in Congress is vote to support President Trump. She could fly to DC the day of key legislative votes (important bills, bills with a R slim).

If Democrats want to play hardball, then she should play even harder ball. This would also have the benefit of her constituents always having representation in Congress.


13 posted on 02/01/2025 12:29:14 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom (They were the FA-est of times, they were the FO-est of times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Democrats -- the party of disenfranchising their enemies.

If they do this, President Trump should move to invoke the 14th amendment on Hokul:

14th Amendment Section 2

Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice-President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.

If the Democrats in New York move to keep the people of NY-21 from choosing a new Representative in Congress, Trump should move to have a Democrat district vacated until such time as NY-21 is allowed to hold an election.

-PJ

14 posted on 02/01/2025 12:38:15 PM PST by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

ex post facto laws are unconstitutional


15 posted on 02/01/2025 12:43:41 PM PST by bunkerhill7 (Don't shoot until you see the whites of their lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jackibutterfly

YES


16 posted on 02/01/2025 12:53:14 PM PST by ridesthemiles (not giving up on TRUMP---EVER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7
ex post facto laws are unconstitutional

You mean like the retroactive tax increases under Clinton that no court blocked?

I don't think the Constitution has counted for much for a long time. Sad.

17 posted on 02/01/2025 12:53:18 PM PST by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s, you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
Yeah, the Dimwitocrats don't give an oblong piece of waste concerning the immediate needs of the people that she has been serving for some time.

Would this have been their strategy if a fellow Dumpstercrat had been the incumbent vacating the post? (=rhetorical)

18 posted on 02/01/2025 12:53:55 PM PST by imardmd1 (To learn is to live; the joy of living: to teach. Fiat Lux!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Could she not resign tomorrow before they can change the law?


19 posted on 02/01/2025 12:56:33 PM PST by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s, you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

If NY legislature does extend time to election after vacancy the DOJ OCR could sue NYS on behalf of the district.
Potentially NYS could face more federal monitoring , voter ID, paper ballots in addition to moving election to where it was before following the vacancy.


20 posted on 02/01/2025 1:04:49 PM PST by grumpygresh ( Civil disobedience by non-compliance; jury and state nullification.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson