[Southside_Chicago_Republican]

For me, one of the impressive things about any work of art is that a human being, through talent and effort, made it. Art is an expression of the human experience and spirit, one of the ways the image of God is evident in us.

I have no interest in AI “art”, no matter how “good” it is.

[Jonty30]

It is going to be primarily economics that will drive this.

[dayglored]

> For me, one of the impressive things about any work of art is that a human being, through talent and effort, made it. Art is an expression of the human experience and spirit, one of the ways the image of God is evident in us. I have no interest in AI “art”, no matter how “good” it is.

AI-generated art, music, prose, poetry HAS NO SOUL. NO HUMANITY.

Without thought, inspiration, feeling, love, suffering, angst, happiness, sorrow, etc. the result is not art, not music, etc.

It might be engaging, satisfying, even beautiful, BUT IT HAS NO SOUL.

I can appreciate AI generated content for what it is, but it not the same as if a human being had done it.

[goodnesswins]

Same here...already on my Pinterest account I see pictures of AI gardens...it is ridiculous and obvious