Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kevin O'Leary warns TikTok's fate could be determined by 'secret golden share' granting Beijing 'veto' power
Fox Business ^ | 01/20/2025 | Taylor Penley (Fox Business)

Posted on 01/20/2025 6:36:57 PM PST by linMcHlp

"There is something called a secret golden share that every Chinese company has to issue to the CCP leadership. That's Xi [Jinping] himself, and it turns out that ByteDance can't negotiate anything unless he's made a decision," the O'Leary Ventures Chairman told "Mornings with Maria" guest host Cheryl Casone.

"The secret share is a veto power over all other shareholders," he explained. "They do not have any rights once the secret share has been issued, so now we're dealing with what to do with the secret share, because until she decides what's going to happen, it doesn't matter what shareholders think or the CEO or any of the management, it's irrelevant. It's the secret golden share that determines the fate of TikTok now."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxbusiness.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; China; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: china; communistparty; goldenshare; internet; prc; socialmedia; tiktok

1 posted on 01/20/2025 6:36:57 PM PST by linMcHlp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: linMcHlp

Kinda Willie Wonkish


2 posted on 01/20/2025 6:38:37 PM PST by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monkeyshine

Embraer (ERJ) had something similar where a ‘Golden Share’ was owned by the Brazilian military (might still be the case).


3 posted on 01/20/2025 6:40:16 PM PST by posterchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: linMcHlp

That would not be necessary then.

Idiocy.


4 posted on 01/20/2025 6:40:17 PM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: linMcHlp

I hope Trump is aware of this and I hope Kevin O’Leary has access to the president if need be. O’Leary is sharp.


5 posted on 01/20/2025 6:42:49 PM PST by laplata (They want each crisis to take the greatest toll possiWe neve hear of gambling paying off $billioble.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laplata

O’Leary was with Trump the other weekend alongside Alberta Premier Danielle Smith.

O’Leary is Canadian by the way he has an interest in the tariff issue.


6 posted on 01/20/2025 6:50:34 PM PST by Nextrush (FREEDOM IS EVERYBODY'S BUSINESS-REMEMBER REV. NIEMOLLER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nextrush

Thanks for the info. I know he’s Canadian and how much he detests Trudeau.


7 posted on 01/20/2025 6:54:44 PM PST by laplata (They want each crisis to take the greatest toll possiWe neve hear of gambling paying off $billioble.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: linMcHlp

I think China as owns 20%.


8 posted on 01/20/2025 6:56:30 PM PST by MV=PY (The Magic Question: Who's paying for it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: linMcHlp

Yet for some reason that’s not a problem when nearly ALL of our drugs come from there, when Boeing want’s to build jets there, Tesla want’s to make things there. When Iphones are made there.

None of that is a risk, because DC and their friends are cashing in.

Mr Wonderful is full of it. He wants to buy it without he algorithm and thinks it’s basically no different than Meta Reels or YouTube shorts.


9 posted on 01/20/2025 7:21:48 PM PST by DesertRhino (2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2025... RETURN OF THE JEDI...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: posterchild

For some reason I thought Embraer was Canadian. So I just looked it up and I was wrong. You’re correct.

Makes sense, sort of, for a socialist country to have veto share. Though I suppose Raytheon is also beholden even if they don’t have a literal golden share.


10 posted on 01/20/2025 7:35:31 PM PST by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: monkeyshine

In business school many moons ago I had to do a ‘case study’ on an ADR business and chose Embraer - the only reason I know the ‘golden share’ issue.


11 posted on 01/20/2025 7:43:03 PM PST by posterchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: monkeyshine

CRJ is Canadair Regional Jet (Bombardier) - perhaps the reason for confusion.


12 posted on 01/20/2025 7:45:45 PM PST by posterchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: monkeyshine

i believe it was a military spin-off


13 posted on 01/20/2025 7:46:56 PM PST by posterchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: linMcHlp

This ChiCom “Golden Share” stuff is quite important. But it’s not really a secret. Even Wikipedia has an entry on the topic. And one section is dedicated specifically to Communist China.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_share#People‘s_Republic_of_China


14 posted on 01/20/2025 8:13:46 PM PST by Leaning Right (It’s morning in America. Again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: linMcHlp

Very interesting.


15 posted on 01/20/2025 8:28:53 PM PST by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: posterchild

Not as worried about the Brazilian War Machine as about the CCP..


16 posted on 01/20/2025 9:06:34 PM PST by RitchieAprile (available monkeys looking for the change..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: linMcHlp

47 said that TT could be worth $1 trillion. But that depends on being OKed, then its worthless. If OKed then the US could be a partner for $500 billion gained from the sale. But then that all depends on Beijing.


17 posted on 01/21/2025 5:08:54 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RitchieAprile

Read recently (likely here on FR) that Iran has a strong presence in Venezuela, and as I watched President Trump last night tell of CCP China controlling the Panama Canal, no I did not know of that one.

Kinda have to laugh though because the Panama Canal was in serious, serious trouble moving cargo through this past year because of the severely low water levels, lack of rainfall. Not toward the United States in any way shipping or receiving any much-needed product, but I’ll bet CCP China was having expletive-laden tirades because their container ships full of cheap crap couldn’t go through the level locks.

The President also talked of Carter “giving away the Panama Canal” (I think to Panama?) and it was, again, paraphrasing, a very bad decision.

President Trump did say about Brazil, in paraphrase, that they (Brazil) may need us but we do not need them—per an answer to a reporter who answered him that she was from Brazil.


18 posted on 01/21/2025 6:17:15 AM PST by Patriot777 ("When you see these things begin to happen, look up, for your redemption draweth nigh.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson