Posted on 12/23/2024 5:59:42 AM PST by Morgana
For the third consecutive year, Virginia governor Glenn Youngkin has proposed a budget amendment that would eliminate taxpayer-funded abortions for fetal anomalies.
According to Virginia Mercury, current state law allows state insurance to cover abortions for cases in which a doctor has diagnosed “gross and totally incapacitating physical deformity or with a gross and totally incapacitating mental deficiency.” Youngkin’s proposed budget amendment would explicitly remove this, with language saying “no expenditures from general or non-general fund sources may be made out of any appropriation by the General Assembly for providing abortion services, except otherwise as required by federal law or state statute.”
Youngkin’s office highlighted the fact that not only is he standing up for life by refusing to support taxpayer funded abortions, he also announced earlier in the week that he is spearheading initiatives that would help moms and families. This combined approach aims to provide more support to women, especially in situations where they may feel pressured to abort.
“Governor Youngkin announced significant new maternal health initiatives this week that will continue to promote a culture of life in the commonwealth, including not forcing Virginia taxpayers to subsidize abortions except where it is required by federal law,” Youngkin’s spokesperson Christian Martinez said.
Planned Parenthood Advocates of Virginia Director Jamie Lockhart responded to Youngkin’s amendment, ironically calling it “discriminatory” and “cruel.” But choosing whether another person should live or die because of that person’s physical or mental capabilities is the ultimate act of discrimination.
“People facing complex and heartbreaking situations, such as a severe fetal diagnosis, deserve compassion, support, and access to necessary abortion care — not stigma and funding barriers that put this care out of reach,” Lockhart said in a statement.
Youngkin has introduced similar budget amendment language in past years, only for it to be removed before the budget’s final passage. He faces similar resistance this year as Democratic lawmakers hold the majority.
If you ever wanted to see a leftist head explode, say you support abortion when genetic testing shows the child is likely to be gay, due to presence of a
“gay gene”.
(Yes, I know the above is nonsense, but it presents an impossible quandary for leftists. )
So it isn't going anywhere again. This is a story we saw for years with the Republicans. They push initiatives that go nowhere. Yet every year they bring them up again and again. I'm not saying its Youngkin's fault. But it reminds me of John Boehner and the Republicans circa 2012. Proposing conservative legislation that goes nowhere.
Abortion for babies in vitro who are brain damaged or physically deformed? I am not a pro abortion type of guy, but it seems like a good policy. My grandsons first child was born without a brain, and the ability to breathe on her own. She was kept alive by machines. It is a mercy to both parents and the child, to be able to end the pregnancy in this case.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.