Posted on 12/18/2024 6:37:28 AM PST by RoosterRedux
Rep. Carlos Giménez (R-Fla.) warned Tuesday that the federal government lacks a clear understanding of widespread drone sightings across the U.S., calling the situation a potential national security vulnerability.
Giménez, a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, told NewsNation’s “Dan Abrams Live” that he is deeply concerned about the government’s inability to track or identify the origins of numerous drone flights.
“The federal government hasn’t the faintest idea what’s going on with these drones,” the Florida Republican said. “That concerns me more than anything else.”
The comments come after multiple drone sightings across the East Coast, including near military installations in New Jersey and Ohio. While White House and Pentagon officials have downplayed the incidents, suggesting most are recreational or commercial aircraft, Giménez argues more investigation is needed.
Pentagon spokesperson Maj. Gen. Pat Ryder acknowledged that over one million drones are registered in the U.S., with approximately 8,500 in flight on any given day. Most are used for recreational or commercial purposes, he said.
“Drones pose a threat and they’re going to be an increasing threat and one day they’re going to do something bad,” Giménez said.
A closed-door House Intelligence Committee briefing on the drone sightings has further fueled speculation. The Florida lawmaker suggested that the classified meeting was an attempt to gain more information after previous public briefings revealed “nothing.”
(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...
They know something. They just want to lie about it.
ping
News from late November 1941 — We’ve got the Imperial Japanese Navy parked just off Hawaii, and Japanese aircraft keep buzzing our naval base at Pearl Harbor. Like they’re doing practice runs for a bombing raid or something. It’s weird. We have no idea what they’re doing. But we’re pretty sure it’s not a threat.
The Congressman has no “need to know”.
It is kinda pathetic.
I worry when politicians express concern.
Of course they know. It is why they have not been eliminated.
“The Congressman has no “need to know”.
It is kinda pathetic.”
.
.
In a way, but cuts down on leaks.
Isn’t this just about highly compartmented TS “war-gaming”?
I have given my speculation on drones before—no need to go there.
What is sad is that most Congressman are not authorized to get information about special access and/or compartmentalized programs in the Pentagon or elsewhere.
Therefore they cannot speak intelligently about any subject that touches those boundaries.
That makes them look like fools.
With all of the GoPros and very high tech video/cam equipment owned by everyday folks, now .... where are the really clear pics and vids of these drones?
Everything I’ve seen posted is as shaky as a 1960s UFO report.
If there are as many as are being reported .... set up a tripod and be ready to film the night (only :) skies. Right?
My guess: These are NEST (Nuclear Emergency Search Team), NRC, military, and/or other fedgov drones looking for missing nuclear materials (aka a dirty bomb) or something else. They don’t want to disclose because the ensuing panic could be ugly.
I for one won’t be going to any large gatherings on New Year’s Eve, esp. in any big US city.
On January 21st, Trump can have a presser and tell the American people what this exercise really was about. I still think this is all about beta testing some new military and policing capabilities using drone technology. I can understand the secretive nature of this due to national security concerns, but the cat is pretty much out of the bag. We don’t need to know what these capabilities are. Just tell us this is testing of capabilities.
“The Congressman has no “need to know”.
It is kinda pathetic.”
.
.
In a way, but cuts down on leaks.
~~~~
This is why I’m mostly not worried about this whole ‘flap’.
Congress doesn’t have a “need to know” and I agree with that. You and I don’t have a need to know either.
We need to get over ourselves.
There are a LOT of things even over and above technology/capability/sources&assets that have to be protected when it comes to strategy.
If some entity, foreign or domestic, friendly or unfriendly, is testing our tactics, capabilities, or engagement policies, it’s important to protect our competitive advantages no matter how they might get exposed, either by over-reacting to pseudo-threats, or by some dipshit congressman showboating about what he heard in a committee.
Then congress has no need to fund. Quite simple really.
Interesting—my view is the exact opposite of yours.
The bulk of “national security” classification keeps data from the American people but totally fails to keep it from professional and skilled adversaries.
In addition it hides domestic bad actors from the consequences of their bad acts.
99% of classified materials should never have been classified in the first place.
Imho this will prove to be one of those cases.
Just wait until a coordinated attack on major airports happens with airliners being brought down and fuel dumps attacked.
I don't know if you are being serious.
The corrupt people inside our government too often abuse their power to classify information.
The citizens of our country have a right to know what their government is doing, especially when government equipment is seen constantly nosing around their neighborhoods.
And there are ways to tell the citizens what is going on without giving away any critical information. But a tyrannical government doesn't believe in the rights of their citizens.
In a free republic, "the need to classify" comes before "the need to now".
Yup.
The government knows exactly what’s going on with the drones. they’re ours.
The government knows exactly what’s going on with the drones. they’re ours.
Just like that big balloon that floated across the country over our sensitive military installations?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.