Supreme Court rules judges can’t review visa revocations in sham marriage case

Washington Examiner ^ | 12/10/2024 | Kaelan Deese

[Sgt_Schultze]

The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday in a case related to a sham marriage for immigration purposes that federal courts cannot review visa revocations, affirming that such decisions are at the discretion of the Department of Homeland Security.

The unanimous ruling clarified that while courts can review initial visa denials, they lack the authority to intervene once DHS revokes an approved visa.

[Sgt_Schultze]

This looks pretty good for Trump's plans to send them packing. unanimous decision.

Brother-husband having Ilan Omar should worry.

[Red Badger]

unanimous ruling..........9-0...................

[Resolute Conservative]

Should be the first one.

[philman_36]

“Congress did not impose specific criteria or conditions limiting this authority, nor did it prescribe how or when the Secretary must act. Context reinforces the discretionary nature of §1155,” the majority wrote, referring to the statute surrounding the revocation of approved visa petitions. That would be 8 USC CHAPTER 12, SUBCHAPTER II: IMMIGRATION From Title 8—ALIENS AND NATIONALITY CHAPTER 12—IMMIGRATION
8 USC 1155: Revocation of approval of petitions; effective date

BOUARFA v. MAYORKAS

In §1155, Congress granted the Secretary broad author- ity to revoke an approved visa petition “at any time, for what he deems to be good and sufficient cause.” Such a rev- ocation is thus “in the discretion of ” the agency. §1252(a)(2)(B)(ii). Where §1252(a)(2)(B)(ii) applies, then, it bars judicial review of the Secretary’s revocation under §1155. Therefore, we affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

EVERYTHING regarding aliens (including automatic citizenship at birth) is covered in USC 8 and NOTHING in the 14th Amendment applies to them.

§1252. Judicial review of orders of removal

[Enterprise]

"Brother-husband having Ilan Omar should worry."

The new head of the DHS should make this couple number one on the deportation list.

[Sgt_Schultze]

Since the SC agrees the authority of DHS is not reviewable by a court for Visa holders, it’s unlikely an illegal would have reviewable status. Deport away!!

[philman_36]

I'm of the opinion that Roberts forced her to write the Opinion.
What leftist is going to naysay her? /rhetorical question

[Lazamataz]

Wow! Don’t see a lot of 9-0’s.

[RWGinger]

“The new head of the DHS should make this couple number one on the deportation list.”
Agree100%
should get many more heading out of country on their own