Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Colorado Pays $1.5 Million For Violating Artist’s First Amendment Rights After Historic SCOTUS Case
The Daily Wire ^ | November 19, 2024 | Mary Margaret Olohan

Posted on 11/20/2024 7:01:11 AM PST by Twotone

Colorado has agreed to pay over $1.5 million after violating the First Amendment rights of a graphic designer who took her case to the United States Supreme Court.

The Court ruled in June that the state could not compel Lorie Smith and her design studio, 303 Creative, to create art that violates her religious beliefs. As a Christian, Smith believes that marriage should be between a man and a woman. Though she wanted to design wedding websites, Colorado’s discrimination laws would have required her to create same-sex wedding websites.

Smith, who was represented by lawyers from the Alliance Defending Freedom, asked the Supreme Court to say Colorado’s discrimination law violated her First Amendment rights. Her case followed that of Jack Phillips, a cake designer persecuted by LGBTQ activists in Colorado for over a decade for attempting to only design cakes consistent with his religious beliefs.

“After enduring Colorado’s censorship for nearly seven years, I’m incredibly grateful for the work of my attorneys at Alliance Defending Freedom to bring my case to victory,” Smith said in a statement on Tuesday. “As the Supreme Court said, I’m free to create art consistent with my beliefs without fear of Colorado punishing me anymore. This is a win not just for me but for all Americans—for those who share my beliefs and for those who hold different views.”

(Excerpt) Read more at dailywire.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: colorado; freespeech; scotus

1 posted on 11/20/2024 7:01:11 AM PST by Twotone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Twotone

BAKE THE CAKE!


2 posted on 11/20/2024 7:06:13 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Import The Third World,Become The Third World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

If homos took their request to a Muslim artist, they would be told no, and the courts would readily uphold their right to say no- do if their religious beleifs are to be honored, then it’s a no Brainer that Christian religious beleifs are to be upheld as well- but even without comparing it to muslim beleifs, it says so right in the constitution that religious beleifs are protected- freedom of religion, and that includes religious ethicsl beleifs!.


3 posted on 11/20/2024 7:17:45 AM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

Praise God and ADF for this win!


4 posted on 11/20/2024 7:49:31 AM PST by Reddy (BO stinks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

“As a Christian”

So marriage between a man and a woman only started after the New Testament was published?

Absurd BS.


5 posted on 11/20/2024 8:40:08 AM PST by Regulator (It's fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reddy

The ADF DESERVES a CHECK from us!!!


6 posted on 11/20/2024 9:00:57 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Twotone
6-3 decision in 2022, no need to guess how the vote broke. This is very old news.

303 CREATIVE LLC ET AL. v. ELENIS ET AL.

7 posted on 11/20/2024 9:22:04 AM PST by NonValueAdded (First, I was a clinger, then deplorable, now I'm garbage. Feel the love?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

She’s speaking to her own beliefs being upheld, not excluding others.

Lighten up, Francis...

Love,
O2


8 posted on 11/20/2024 9:27:42 AM PST by omegatoo (You know you'll get your money's worth...become a monthly donor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Regulator
“As a Christian” So marriage between a man and a woman only started after the New Testament was published? Absurd BS.

That is not what she meant. But she arrived at her value system through Christianity, which also teaches the entire Hebrew Bible (the Old Testament) that stretches back more than 5,000 years, in which the God Jehovah communicates with Adam and Eve and Moses, among many others. The marriage of a man and a woman appears in the first book of that Bible, Genesis.

9 posted on 11/20/2024 1:59:28 PM PST by Albion Wilde (“Did you ever meet a woke person that’s happy? There’s no such thing.” —Donald J. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde

Yeah we all know that.

But the implication in the media is that ordinary marriage is a Christian aberration exclusive to that sect.

The truth is that monogamous marriage is ubiquitous on Earth and is found in virtually all successful cultures. Almost like nature’s God made it that way, huh?

Do you think that the Teutonic, Slavic, Scandinavian, Frankish, Helvetian, Brythonic, Celtic ethnicities were all wiggin’ out on group sex and pre-historic Mormon polygamy? Before Boniface showed up to set them straight?

And Asia? Were they completely off the map?

All successful human populations adopt monogamy and nuclear families. The unsuccessful ones...think “large continent south of the Mediterranean, East of the Atlantic”...still do stupid stuff like polygamy with the Big Man of the village being the possessor of most of the pride. IOW just like the animals around them.

And as far as marriage between same sexes is unheard of in anyone’s history. For the simple reason that it doesn’t result in children or a surviving nation, in addition to being disgusting as a matter of human nature to all but about 0.5% of the population.

So spare me the “explanations”. My point is that I refuse to let the Left compartmentalize marriage as some sort of Christian aberration, and everyone else is off the sex cliff. There are cases of that, but not in successful, surviving cultures.


10 posted on 11/20/2024 4:30:28 PM PST by Regulator (It's fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Regulator
the implication in the media is that ordinary marriage is a Christian aberration exclusive to that sect.

People see what they want to see. As you have done here, so you could get a shot off at 1) Christianity, or 2) media. Hope it made you feel better. I'm not convinced.

11 posted on 11/20/2024 10:14:56 PM PST by Albion Wilde (“Did you ever meet a woke person that’s happy? There’s no such thing.” —Donald J. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson