Posted on 11/18/2024 8:10:27 AM PST by Red Badger
The Trump transition team is compiling a list of senior current and former U.S. military officers who were directly involved in the withdrawal from Afghanistan and exploring whether they could be court-martialed for their involvement, according to a U.S. official and a person familiar with the plan.
Officials working on the transition are considering creating a commission to investigate the 2021 withdrawal from Afghanistan, including gathering information about who was directly involved in the decision-making for the military, how it was carried out and whether the military leaders could be eligible for charges as serious as treason, the two sources said.
“They’re taking it very seriously,” the person with knowledge of the plan said.
The Trump transition team did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Matt Flynn, a former deputy assistant secretary of defense for counternarcotics and global threats, is helping lead the effort, the sources said. It is being framed as a review of how the U.S. first got into the war in Afghanistan and how it ultimately withdrew.
“Matt Flynn has nothing to do with the Trump transition team, much less leading any review concerning military justice matters,” said Mark S. Zaid, Flynn’s attorney. Zaid said in a statement that “no one has sought out Mr. Flynn’s views on this hypothetical legal scenario.”
Multiple officials on the Trump transition team did not immediately respond to requests for comment about this article.
“The sources apparently pushing this story appear to be your typical selfish Washington, D.C., insiders seeking to gain better positioning for their own administration jobs,” said a person with knowledge of the campaign.
President-elect Donald Trump has condemned the withdrawal as a “humiliation” and “the most embarrassing day in the history of our country.”
It is not clear, though, what would legally justify “treason” charges, since the military officers were following the orders of President Joe Biden to withdraw all U.S. forces from Afghanistan.
A 2022 independent review by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction blamed both the Trump and Biden administrations for the chaotic U.S. withdrawal in 2021.
Trump first reached an agreement with the Taliban in 2020 to withdraw all U.S. forces from Afghanistan, roughly 13,000 troops, and release 5,000 Taliban fighters from prison. The Biden administration then completed the withdrawal and badly overestimated the ability of Afghan government forces to fight the Taliban on their own.
Trump’s choice for defense secretary, Fox News personality Pete Hegseth, has criticized the withdrawal, saying the U.S. lost the war and wasted billions of dollars.
In his book “The War on Warriors,” Hegseth wrote: “The next president of the United States needs to radically overhaul Pentagon senior leadership to make us ready to defend our nation and defeat our enemies. Lots of people need to be fired. The debacle in Afghanistan, of course, is the most glaring example.”
Hegseth calls the withdrawal a “humiliating retreat” and says leaders at the Defense Department were not held accountable for the deadly attack at Abbey Gate, which killed 13 U.S. service members and roughly 170 Afghan civilians. Nor were they held accountable for a subsequent U.S. airstrike in Kabul that officials thought would kill the Islamic State group leader behind the suicide attack but instead killed 10 innocent Afghans, including seven children, he wrote.
“These generals lied. They mismanaged. They violated their oath. They failed. They disgraced our troops, and our nation. They got people killed, unnecessarily,” he wrote. “And, to this moment, they keep their jobs. Worse, they continue to actively erode our military and its values — by capitulating to civilians with radical agendas. They are an embarrassment, with stars still on their shoulders.”
The transition team is looking at the possibility of recalling several commanders to active duty for possible charges, the U.S. official said.
It is not clear the Trump administration would pursue treason charges, and instead it could focus on lesser charges that highlight the officers’ involvement. “They want to set an example,” said the person with knowledge of the plan.
Speaking to NBC News days before the election, Howard Lutnick, one of the two advisers leading the transition, said that Trump learned after his first administration that he had hired Democratic generals and that he would not make that mistake again.
Former officials who worked in Trump’s first administration have said they advised Trump against policies they thought would weaken U.S. national security, such as withdrawing U.S. troops from Syria. And they advised against actions that they thought might violate the Constitution or inflame tensions domestically, such as deploying active-duty U.S. troops to quell protests after the 2020 police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis.
Popcorn futures are gonna skyrocket!
They can focus on the replacements for the 200 general officers that were fired or forced to retire!
MSM-Democrats will go wild about this.
As in the his first term, they will pretend Trump isn’t actually the President, and so any time he uses Presidential powers, he’s breaking the law. In their minds, anyway.
“Sources Said” “People familiar with the plan stated”.
Start with Miley.
L
Agreed! Milley needs to be number ONE on the list.
Easy. They’ll blame it on the geriatric head case. Why not? It was stupid enough to be the work of a compromised brain.
the left will liken this to the killing of the generals under stalin... which made the soviet military weaker, this is a necessity to bring back the strength of our military
Baloney. This is from NBC, ‘nuff said.
Watch how many retire to avoid court martial. That just means self selection of the weeding out process.
EC
General Miley.
They can be recalled...................
EXCELLENT! There are a lot of them who need to be court martialed including senior officers who called him Hitler, Mussolini, Fascist, etc. That’s a violation of the UCMJ to publicly disparage the president like that. Hayden, Kelley, Milley, etc etc.
Why focus on courts-martial? Obama simply fired all the generals when he took office and replaced them with our current crop of Marxists. Can Trump not do the same? Fire them all and replace them with MAGA types, promoting as necessary.
Woo-hoo!
His contact with his Chinese military counterpart after the 2020 election should be good for any charge from insubordination to treason. Can we still use a firing squad?
How about turning the pensions over to the families of the dead.
“The Trump transition team is compiling a list of senior current and former U.S. military officers who were directly involved in the withdrawal from Afghanistan and exploring whether they could be court-martialed for their involvement, according to a U.S. official and a person familiar with the plan.”
So the story is being pushed by a “US official”, i.e., a Biden administration Democrat stirring up trouble.
Charging those responsible for the major screwups is reasonable, though the easy defenses will be: Biden ordered the timetable; Biden’s timetable benefitted the Taliban’s fighting season; Biden’s timetable made an orderly withdrawal of assets/ personnel impossible; Defendants believed the CIA and DIA’s claims that the Afghan Army could/would stand up long enough to cover the withdrawal. An investigation might turn up some smoking guns, but prosecuting military officers while failing to convict is not a smart move.
Charging them with treason over this is preposterous, based on what constitutes treason under US law. So talk of that is just inflammatory rhetoric. Who benefits from that?
Bill Kristol
Mara Liasson
Harry Litman
Heather Cox Richardson
Know the score. They also know the solution
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.