Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California judge rules Huntington Beach can proceed with voter ID law
AP News ^ | November 15, 2024

Posted on 11/16/2024 8:48:27 PM PST by MinorityRepublican

A judge on Friday rejected California’s lawsuit against the city of Huntington Beach over a local measure allowing officials to require voter identification at the polls.

Orange County Superior Court Judge Nico Dourbetas ruled that existing state law does not block the local measure, which was approved by voters earlier this year. The ruling could clear the way for the majority-Republican city to implement one of California’s only voter ID requirements at the polls in local elections.

“It’s a massive black eye to the state of California,” City Attorney Michael Gates said of the ruling. “And what the state of California needs to know, if they haven’t found out already, is Huntington Beach is not going to be intimidated or deterred.”

State Attorney General Rob Bonta’s office said in a statement to The Associated Press that the Friday decision “does not address the merits of the case.”

“We continue to believe that Huntington Beach’s voter ID policy clearly conflicts with state law, and will respond appropriately in court,” the office added.

Residents in the seaside city of Huntington Beach voted in March for a ballot measure that lets local officials require voter identification at the polls starting in 2026. It also allows the city to increase in-person voting sites and monitor ballot drop boxes in local elections.

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...


TOPICS: US: California
KEYWORDS: california; californication; election; huntingtonbeach; nicodourbetas; orangecounty; voterid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 11/16/2024 8:48:27 PM PST by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
BTTT

2 posted on 11/16/2024 8:54:41 PM PST by linMcHlp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Would be nice to see the new congress require voter ID nationally.


3 posted on 11/16/2024 8:54:55 PM PST by where's_the_Outrage? (Drain the Swamp. Build the Wall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Catch is the only photo ID that will work is like the Kamala Harris picture on the giant sphere in Las Vegas.

$500,000 each.


4 posted on 11/16/2024 9:06:20 PM PST by frank ballenger (There's a battle outside and it's raging. It'll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

RE: Would be nice to see the new congress require voter ID nationally.

What would that mean they’re trying to do? Bring America fair and honest elections?


5 posted on 11/16/2024 9:08:07 PM PST by frank ballenger (There's a battle outside and it's raging. It'll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: frank ballenger
IMG-1256

Yes, hopefully HB can enlist former mayor Tito Ortiz to enforce the voter ID. 👍

6 posted on 11/16/2024 9:41:17 PM PST by broken_clock (Go Trump! Prayers answered!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

I’ve been praying for this. It’s a good start. Thank God.


7 posted on 11/16/2024 9:51:30 PM PST by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Voting integrity is a constitutional issue. Voter integrity is protected by 14th and 15th amendments. A reformed DOJ will intervene to protect those disenfranchised by fraud.
If the states want to interfere, they can be charged with obstruction of justice.


8 posted on 11/16/2024 9:58:09 PM PST by grumpygresh ( Civil disobedience by non-compliance; jury and state nullification.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Agreed.


9 posted on 11/16/2024 10:06:45 PM PST by TheDon (Resist the usurpers! Remember the J6 political prisoners!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: grumpygresh

Or the states can just follow their own dang existing laws which are probably not criminal friendly either.


10 posted on 11/16/2024 10:10:19 PM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult (“History doesn’t repeat itself but it often rhymes” - Possibly Mark Twain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

I agree.


11 posted on 11/16/2024 10:18:09 PM PST by No name given ( Anonymous is who you’ll know me as)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

“Orange County Superior Court Judge Nico Dourbetas ruled that existing state law does not block the local measure,”

That will change quick because the democrats control the state legislature.


12 posted on 11/16/2024 10:31:11 PM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
State Attorney General Rob Bonta’s office said in a statement to The Associated Press that the Friday decision “does not address the merits of the case.”

“We continue to believe that Huntington Beach’s voter ID policy clearly conflicts with state law, and will respond appropriately in court,” the office added.

Well, God forbid if only citizens are allowed to vote in our elections, right Rob?

13 posted on 11/16/2024 11:24:48 PM PST by Bullish (Socialism is a weed that blooms into communism, the tyranny that strangles liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
Would be nice to see the new congress require voter ID nationally.

It would, but I get really nervous when federal laws are applied to states rights when it comes to voting. Next thing you know, we lose the Republic.

14 posted on 11/16/2024 11:26:59 PM PST by Bullish (Socialism is a weed that blooms into communism, the tyranny that strangles liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bullish

I agree we need to be really careful, but as Elon Musk and a couple other people pointed out, we almost lost the Republic this election. With the legal immigration and their strategic dispersal of illegals to battleground states, and then amnesty to follow that. We would be a one party government

So I think we need to risk it somehow to get our elections back to where they need to be. As far as I can see, I believe a Senate was stolen in Nevada, Arizona, and Michigan because of this crap.


15 posted on 11/16/2024 11:31:44 PM PST by suasponte137
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Bullish

Without honest elections we don’t have a republic.


16 posted on 11/17/2024 12:06:12 AM PST by Truthsearcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Truthsearcher

If you think the federal govt can make elections ‘honest’ without a Constitutional amendment then you have another think coming. The one size fits all that the feds would put us in would have us a one party state like California in no time. We’d end up being owned lock stock and barrel by Washington DC instead of the individual states as it is now. What’s needed is an article 3 convention of the states to put a citizen only voting amendment in the bill of rights along with some other provisions that block the feds from interference with that. I’m sure you’ve heard of the movement which many states have already signed on to. We need to all get behind it.


17 posted on 11/17/2024 12:31:06 AM PST by Bullish (Socialism is a weed that blooms into communism, the tyranny that strangles liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

California no voter ID law is illegitimate.


18 posted on 11/17/2024 12:34:10 AM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bullish

Every state that voted Kamala was a no-ID-Required state.


19 posted on 11/17/2024 1:12:59 AM PST by Does so (Vote for The Anti-War President...🇺🇦...Dem☭crats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Bullish; where's_the_Outrage?
It would, but I get really nervous when federal laws are applied to states rights when it comes to voting. Next thing you know, we lose the Republic.

Except this is not a "States Rights" issue, where Federal elections are concerned.

The constitution explicitly gives Congress the right to legislate the manner and procedure of Federal elections.
20 posted on 11/17/2024 3:31:46 AM PST by SoConPubbie (Trump has all the right enemies, DeSantis has all the wrong friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson