Posted on 10/16/2024 9:29:49 AM PDT by CFW
Thanks to the surgeon-like precision of my researcher Haley McLean, this timeline (we believe) represents the most exhaustive one to date showing the requests and denials related to the deployment of the D.C. National Guard before and on January 6, 2021. Events have been curated from a number of resources including congressional testimony, internal agency investigations, media coverage, videos, and book excerpts.
We preface the timeline with critical context and information about the lead-up to January 6 involving key political operatives and known foes of President Trump.
Summer 2020
Jamie Fleet, then-Democratic staffer for Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and the Committee on House Administration (chaired, at the time, by Rep. Zoe Lofgren, who was later appointed to Pelosi’s January 6 Select Committee) had a team of counselors working in anticipation of coming debates and objections from states—including Arizona, Pennsylvania, and Georgia—about the certification of the electoral college vote. Knowing that objections would likely be raised on January 6, Fleet’s team began contingency planning to prepare for the possibility that the proceedings would "not [be] traditional."
(Excerpt) Read more at declassified.live ...
I thought Freepers might appreciate having a link to this information.
If this is accurate then it is the perfect defense for Trump against using Insurrection charge on Jan 6th.
If this how our Government responds to calls from our leaders for help, then God Help the USA if a foreign nation should attack. Our Military is incapable of making a decision in a critical time.
bump
They flooded DC with two divisions worth of National Guard immediately after J6, fences, checkpoints etc. They flooded them in so fast from all 50 states that they were sleeping on the floors of parking garages.
In contrast, North Carolina sat there for almost 9 days before they got off their dead asses and started moving.
DOD cares about DC. Someone in Appalachia means nothing to them.
Oh... the military leaders made a decision alright. It was to throw in with the coup and the big lie that Biden won.
June 10, 2020 was months before the election and Milley was already determined to plant flags (presumably false ones).
Just wow. Thanks for posting. Not one Freeper in a hundred will bother to read it, but that’s okay.
Bookmarked.
Thanks. I have it bookmarked for reference. A lot of work went into this compilation.
Meanwhile, check this out.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/10/desperate-jack-smith-makes-new-crazy-claim-about/
Also:
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67656604/263/united-states-v-trump/
Judge Tanya Chutkan blocks the Trump team’s attempt to get classified records in the January 6 case.
The D.C. circuit judge also appeared to shield records on General Milley’s concession that Donald Trump did seek enhanced security for the 2020 election certification.
In a footnote in the legal document it notes:
“Defendant argues that he is entitled to additional, classified records based on a statement General Milley made to the Committee, offering to disclose additional, classified records. But Defendant proffers no evidence that the Committee ever received those records, much less that the Special Counsel’s Office had access to them, or that those records would be material to this case.”
However, Judge Chutkan did authorize a search for specific records pertaining to Donald Trump’s security meeting with Gen. Mark Milley and former Sec. of Defense Christopher Miller.
“As noted, there is one exception. Defendant cites a public report that includes General Mark Milley’s recollection of a meeting he had a few days before January 6 with Defendant and the Acting Secretary of Defense, Christopher C. Miller.
“According to the report, the meeting’s ‘primary topic ... was unrelated to the scheduled rally,’ but...
...at the end of the meeting, the President told Mr. Miller that there would be a large number of protestors on January 6, 2021, and Mr. Miller should ensure sufficient National Guard or Soldiers would be there to make sure it was a safe event. . .
Mr. Miller responded, “We’ve got a plan and we’ve got it covered.”
It turns out, the Pentagon did have a plan. But that plan wasn’t to secure the Capitol on January 6.
“Accordingly, the court will order the Government to search for and produce any additional records within its possession concerning information about security measures that was conveyed to Defendant during his meeting with General Milley and Acting Secretary Miller.”
The J6 judge rejected most of the Trump legal team’s demands for exculpatory evidence on the basis that its requests were “speculative” and placed the burden on the defense to prove Brady rule violations.
“Defendant contends that the Government has failed to comply with its discovery obligations under Brady and Rule 16,” the lawsuit states.
The judge further bats down the Trump legal team’s requests on the basis that, “Five of the fourteen categories of information Defendant seeks specifically request discrete, identified documents. The remaining nine categories are generic requests for ‘all information’ or ‘evidence’ relating to certain topics. As explained below, Defendant has only carried his burden with respect to a small portion of the information he seeks. For most of it, he has proffered only speculation that a search will yield material, noncumulative information.”
Chutkan subsequently shoots down requests for the following types of information:
• 2016 Election Intelligence Community Assessment
• 2020 Election DOJ-DHS Report
• DNI records (Jencks Act material)
• J6 Responsibility Statements
• J6 Select Committee
• CIA records
• Feds working the capitol on J6
The production of these classified documents could further confirm Trump’s desire to enhance capitol security for the election certification, which would prove to be another massive blow to the media’s J6 narrative.
As I stated, our DEI military is currently incapable of making a decision in a critical time.
Indecision is not their problem. Its that they are on the hate America team. They decide to stand against us and people think that is indecisive. What you see as indecisive, is them making a decision to stand off to the side and refuse orders from Trump, etc. They move rapidly when it’s what they want, like changing base names, DEI, etc.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.