Posted on 10/03/2024 6:48:54 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
In 2023, Minnesota repealed protections for infants born alive during botched abortions, meaning that doctors and mothers can let a fully-developed baby die without health care—which is exactly what President Trump and JD Vance have been saying. There are no limits in Minnesota, and a handful of other states, as to how late an “abortion” can be performed. Here’s what Vance said, verbatim:
As I read the Minnesota law that you signed into law, the statute that you signed into law says a doctor who presides over an abortion where the baby survives, the doctor is under no obligation to provide life-saving care to a baby who survives a botched late-term abortion.
To this, Walz said, “That’s not true.’
Well, either Walz has no idea what he signed, or he is just a congenital liar, and either people posing as journalists who refused to fact-check him have never read the Minnesota law, or they don’t care about the truth and are also congenital liars.
Here’s the NBC “fact-check” scramble to cover Walz’s record, pretending the new language is no different than the old:
Passage of the 2023 law led to the removal of certain language from Minnesota statutes, including language that required physicians to ‘preserve the life and health’ of an infant ‘born alive.’ State statutes now say that ‘all reasonable measures consistent with good medical practice … shall be taken by the responsible medical personnel to care for the infant who is born alive.’
“Reasonable measures consistent with good medical practice….” Somehow, I don’t exactly trust the discernment of a person attempting to butcher a fully-developed baby; if someone is willing to tear a baby to pieces, I don’t think their judgment on “reasonable measures” and “good medical practice” are exactly sound.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Walz brought up one woman who died in Georgia, a death he falsely blamed on Trump and Republicans. How about the eight babies who survived abortions and then died in Minnesota under Walz’s “leadership” because Democrats don’t consider them to have rights?
Just thinking how desperate the Harris team was and is, to get another presidential debate. Now they have precious days of the news cycle concentrating on Walz as a disaster.
Campaigns absolutely hate when the VP becomes a drag on the top spot.
At least a new debate with Trump would have changed the conversation.
ChiComTimpon is a pathological lying, murdering traitor.
And neither he nor Commielaw deserve to be elected.
Real MDs should take the babies to safety.
That’s okay. Trump and Vance support chemical abortion, which keeps the doors to planned parenthood open. Big government medical is hiding the dangers of even early abortion. Pill one kills the baby, pill two dilates and contracts to deliver the dead baby. In this way, rape and incest can be covered up.
Every reasonable woman knows why a man supports abortion. These men disgust me.
The money to universities, abortion mills, big pharma is too much to overcome. The atrocities they commit to “save you” from cancer, Alzheimer’s or anything else they can scare you with, are more than inhumane. This is the stuff of dark ages.
The obvious takeaway is not to do debates only with the usual media suspects. I thought that was supposed to change with Lara Trump replacing lardbutt maximus at the RNC, but they must be working on other things.
These aren’t MDs. They are Mengele’s disciples and Satan’s agents on Earth.
A child born in such circumstances may not have a name, but they certainly have a title...citizen. However helpless, these citizens are entitled to the full range of rights, privileges and protections that every other citizen enjoys. To be denied such protections (medical assistance and life-sustaining care) is a violation of the basic Constitutional right to life. The DOJ should line up everyone involved in these “failed” abortions and charge them with capital murder.
“he is just a congenital liar”
Liar means nothing to the left. Call them names that hurt. He is a “congenital spreader of misinformation”!
The key term removed is “obligation” to preserve life, now it’s just nebulous wording.
Yes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.