Posted on 10/02/2024 9:41:49 AM PDT by BenLurkin
Global research already suggests the risk of COVID-19 infection rises with each mRNA vaccine dose and a higher risk of heart inflammation in jabbed young people, especially males, who face a low risk from COVID itself.
Now a three-year study of nearly 1,000 heart attack patients at a hospital in Spain, published in a peer-reviewed Elsevier journal this month, suggests vaccination makes them far more likely to have "major adverse cardiovascular events" including death within six months of their heart attacks, especially when they've also recovered from COVID infection.
The Madrid-based researchers found "no significant association," however, between MACE and N-antibodies that result from infection as opposed to vaccination.
"The combination of vaccination and natural SARS-CoV2 infection was associated with the development of severe heart failure and cardiogenic shock in patients with STEMI" – ST-elevation myocardial infarction, or complete artery blockage – "possibly related to an increased serological response" to vaccination, according to the paper in Vaccine.
The March 2020-March 2023 study does not appear to have drawn notice except among doctors, researchers and journalists who have faced suppression for pointing to worrisome connections between COVID vaccines and severe adverse events in low-risk populations such as youth.
(Excerpt) Read more at justthenews.com ...
Can we stop calling the mRNA shots “vaccines”?
They aren’t and I refuse to call them that.
I only have an advanced degree in engineering, but when I tested positive for covid using home-test-kit, and had symptoms of covid, I recovered in 36 hours without any medications or doctor or hospital visit. Common sense tells me there must be some strong anti-bodies in my system. Was it from the 3 jabs of mRNA based experimental vaccines? I have no clue. But I will take the results gladly.
This study has several limitations. First, it is not possible to thoroughly analyze the effect of the different vaccine types because different combinations were given to each patient. Second, we do not know whether SARS CoV-2 infection occurred before or after vaccination in patients admitted for MI after the start of vaccination in Madrid. Third, we did not have comprehensive information on symptoms associated with previous SARS CoV-2 infection in patients, so we could not analyze the influence of COVID-19 severity on our results. Finally, because of the study design, it cannot be determined whether vaccinated patients with positive SARS-CoV-2 serology had an increased risk of type 1 MI.
I have been saying that since it came out.
A couple other annoyances “our democracy” and the use of being “triggered” have run their course with me as well.
[Can we stop calling the mRNA shots “vaccines”?]
I agree - they are NOT “vaccines”
However, I like to call them va666ines
Because - controlling the masses through engineered fear
And wildly effective at controlling the masses (the application and promotion of same)
In before some retards says “No vaccine is 100% safe.”
In before some retards says “No vaccine is 100% safe.”
since this thread is about the dangers of mRna cell programming, why would anyone say anything about vaccines ?
I’ve had all the mRNA COVID shots I’m going to take, plus one bout of COVID itself.
My cardiovascular health is excellent, as shown by a battery of tests that made my former cardiologist discharge me from any further tests or treatments. With the Lord’s help, I’ll be OK.
As for mRNA vaccines, there needs to be good scientific evaluation of them under a Trump-Kennedy administration.
NOT to mention they also CAUSED the heart attack!
Good question. I believe this statement from the UK government in May 200 might answer it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adj8MCsZKlg
May 2020.
Not May 200
Don’t look at me. I never called the things “vaccines”. Frankenshots, yes.
Batch numbers with varying degrees of bad ingredients (or zero bad ingredients) in the shots could’ve made this the perfect DEPOPULATION crime. Traceability & Plausible Deniability.
Covid version circa 2020 caused the most deaths. The newer versions seem to milder.
COVID vaccine science catching up with 'conspiracy theorists
I don’t have any advanced degrees, but when I decided not to get any MRNA vaccines I was happy after multiple exposures to vaccinated friends and family that I never got covid.
Based on my actual experience, I have avoided heart issues and attacks with 60 minutes of aerobic activity during every week.
I had heart issues in mid-50’s age such as irregular heart-beats, chest pains after eating a good restaurant meal, high blood pressure. I had no time or was too tired to exercise working full time. Now at age 84, I have no heart issues, after 3 jabs of mRNA based covid vaccines.
Best way to avoid any viral infection is to get mild exposure to the virus, creating immunity. Only a small fraction of Americans actually got serious covid attack. All depends on how serious and sudden exposure to virus was experienced.
I tested positive to covid with symptoms after exposure in a hospital, escorting my wife for cancer treatments. I recovered from covid symptoms in a day and a half, without using any medications, without visiting a hospital. That was much faster than I recover from simple cold or flu. And after 3 jabs of the experimental vaccine, I have had zero adverse effects.
“Based on my actual experience, I have avoided heart issues and attacks with 60 minutes of aerobic activity during every week.
I had heart issues in mid-50’s age such as irregular heart-beats, chest pains after eating a good restaurant meal, high blood pressure. I had no time or was too tired to exercise working full time. Now at age 84, I have no heart issues, after 3 jabs of mRNA based covid vaccines.”
You don’t happen to do a lot cruises, do ya? *snicker*
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.