Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is this election close? The battleground states
Uncommon Analysis ^ | 09/27/2024 | Uncommon Analysis

Posted on 09/27/2024 7:41:12 AM PDT by HamiltonJay

Is this election close?, the battleground states

Continuing the discussion from yesterday, time to look at the battleground states.

The “punditry” tells the world that these 7 states are the battleground states for this election. Arizona, Nevada, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, North Carolina and Georgia.

Looking the real clear polling for each of these. GA and NC appear to be solid Trump, though within the margin of error (MOE), nearly all polling has Trump up in these states. Personally I think it has been wishful thinking on the part of many people that either of these states are considered “in play”. I could of course be completely wrong, but NC has only gone blue one time since 1976, and that was Obama’s first term, where they squeaked out a .42% win. Some might argue in NC, given the trouble the Republican Gubernatorial candidates has found himself in, that this could perhaps have an impact on the Presidential election… Personally I doubt that theory, and would expect NC to go to Trump by 3-5 points when the smoke clears. I don’t think when the dust settles NC is going to be terribly close. GA on the other hand on paper does look a little more competitive and Biden did manage to eek out a .23% win in 2020 there. However, I suspect when the dust settled Trump will carry the state by 3-5 points come election day. Polling is fairly the same in NC and GA… tight but Trump’s favor.

...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 09/27/2024 7:41:12 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

“Looking the real clear polling for each of these”

That is the flaw in this analysis.


2 posted on 09/27/2024 7:43:42 AM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer

Actually read the article.


3 posted on 09/27/2024 7:44:42 AM PDT by HamiltonJay ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

“Is this election close?”

Depends on who you talk with and how much the parties can get awy with.

wy69


4 posted on 09/27/2024 7:53:05 AM PDT by whitney69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

If we believe it’s close, it’s easier for them to hide the cheating.


5 posted on 09/27/2024 7:57:21 AM PDT by JimRed (TERM LIMITS, NOW! Finish the damned WALL! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

I firmly believe this election is now Trump’s to lose.

1) World leaders have been flocking to sit down and talk to Trump.
2) Zuckerberg claims to now be a Libertarian and is “reaching out to Trump”.
3) The FBI nabs Diddy so they can secure all the video before Trump’s FBI can get it.
4) There are reports that they are now processing illegal immigrants as fast as possible.


6 posted on 09/27/2024 7:59:44 AM PDT by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

It should not even be close. The fact that we have to ask is evidence of an embarrassing amount of stupidity among the people who vote and corruption among the people who are voted for.


7 posted on 09/27/2024 8:00:33 AM PDT by webheart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webheart

White liberal women and their bloodlust for abortion and the mentally ill. That’s why this is even close. The 47%.


8 posted on 09/27/2024 8:05:40 AM PDT by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay


9 posted on 09/27/2024 8:06:07 AM PDT by thegagline (Sic semper tyrannis! Trump & Vance, 2024! (Formerly) Goldwater & Thomas Sowell in 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

Around here, Trump yard signs are springing up like weeds in July. Only a few what’s her name signs anywhere, even at houses that had Buydung signs in 2020.


10 posted on 09/27/2024 8:13:45 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (Kamala's New Way Forward = Chairman Mao's Great Leap Forward)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webheart
I doubt it is. One way to facilitate a successful steal is to claim just how close the election margin is.

See the Democrats realized their mistake with Hillary by claiming that she had this tremendous lead & touted this tremendous lead all the way up to the election. They still cheated, but they cheated to give her an overwhelming national majority vote, unconcerned about the electoral vote.

That loss forced the Democrats to adjust their theft strategies. You are witnessing that strategy being played out.

It worked in 2020, but will it work for 2024 with Kamala?

11 posted on 09/27/2024 8:17:05 AM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind

Here in Austin I’ve seen two Harris/Walz signs and no Trump signs. I’d put up a Trump sign however 1) my wife wants to keep her job as a teacher 2) I just had the exterior of my house painted.


12 posted on 09/27/2024 8:17:44 AM PDT by thegagline (Sic semper tyrannis! Trump & Vance, 2024! (Formerly) Goldwater & Thomas Sowell in 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: All

North Carolina electorate is 23% black, far above the national average. Population gains as of 2022 have been predominantly white.

Georgia electorate is 30% black, far above the national average. Population gains as of 2022 have been predominantly black. Black gains average 47K/yr. That would be 188K since 2020 to today, but while black gains have been predominant, there have been white gains, too.

Overall population has gained 401K since 2020. Some Hispanic but in general White increase not many fewer than the 188K black gains.


13 posted on 09/27/2024 8:20:09 AM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

Watched a YouTube vid showing Harris up by +3 nationwide. It was an NBC report of selected polling averages (not RCP) and naturally NBC is not Trump friendly.

Interestingly, Kamala was at 80% with black voters, and this was an average of multiple polls. Biden got 92% of the black vote in 2020. Some blacks will probably ‘come home’ on election day, but even 85% would be a big problem for Dems.

Trump was at 41% with Hispanics, again not Trump friendly polling, but that is about a 33% increase over 2020. Some other polls show more support from Hispanics, but even 41% is a major swing toward Trump.

So, how is Kamala at +3 in the polling average nationwide when she is doing much worse with both blacks and Hispanics than Biden did?

My guess is that most of the pollsters haven’t figured out how to factor in the trouble Harris is having with minorities and they’re still using turnout figures for minorities from earlier election years.


14 posted on 09/27/2024 8:21:36 AM PDT by Roadrunner383
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer

” Looking the real clear polling”

Great minds think alike.

Real Clear Politics is an average of old and garbage polls.

Why would ANYONE rely on their data?

Polls in general are a joke and shouldn’t be believed.

F polls.


15 posted on 09/27/2024 8:27:21 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

ZERO votes have been cast/counted.


16 posted on 09/27/2024 8:28:07 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

No, it is not close. Trump has now underpolled by 2.1 national average in two straight elections. So add 2.1 to any national poll.

But the state polling errors were far worse: avg. error of 6 points in WI (toward Ds), average error of over 4 point in OH (toward Ds) average error of 2 points (toward Ds in MN). And so on.

When you factor in the average STATE margin of error, Trump is on schedule for a national popular vote win and a 312 MINIMUM EC victory. However, the early vote out of VA is showing significant D shortfalls from 2020, with significant R gains, and most of all, the “low propensity voters” are NOT Trump+17 as Baris predicted last year.

They are Trump +33.


17 posted on 09/27/2024 8:29:55 AM PDT by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." Jimi Hendrix)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roadrunner383

Yes, Harris is running well behind Biden or Hillary in lots of key Democrat demographics blacks, hispanics, etc.. in fact some polls have Trump flat out winning the Hispanic vote.

The Quinnipiac poll that came out earlier this week is just DEVASTATING for Harris.. while the poll claimed a tie at the national level.. Historically Quinnipiac is AWEFUL.. the overestimate Democrats by astranomical proportions in every single poll.

So, if they best they can do is show her tied, she’s in big trouble. Base don histrocial performance if Kamala was only up 1 she would likely show up in the quinnipiac poll as up 7-10, that’s how bad their polling has been for decades.

Digging into the poll you see all the patterns we are discussing, she’s underperforming in nearly every single demorat demographic.

Now its possible Quinnipiac has somehow adjusted their techniques, sampling and weighting to have a poll showing “EVEN”.. but based on history.. this poll should have anyone supporting dems panicking.


18 posted on 09/27/2024 8:33:15 AM PDT by HamiltonJay ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: thegagline
The problem with RCP are the outlining polls with crazy numbers for Harris. Tied is a bad place to be if you are Harris. Trump under performs in polling and if that proves true this cycle Harris is in trouble.

WI, MI and PA will be tough for Trump, Philly, Detroit and Milwaukee will massively cheat. That is why Trump is pushing hard for early voting. The difference this year may be Turning Point. They are bring people into WI, PA and MI as drop box monitors, going to Nursing Homes and getting elderly voters to the polls or helping them fill out ballots. Essentially everything the RATS do.

While I believe there will be massive cheating in those States, I am curious about one thing. If the RATs thought Harris could win, Newsome, Cooper, Shapiro or Whitmer would have been on the ticket. While Harris as President would be a disaster, Any of the above would be strong candidates in 2028 or later. If Harris wins, they are out of National politics until 2032, that's a long time to leave your starting line up on the bench. Maybe the RAT leaders really do not want Harris to win and this is all smoke and mirrors. Just a thought.

19 posted on 09/27/2024 8:36:48 AM PDT by OldGoatCPO (No Caitiff Choir of Angels will sing for me. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

This is positive on first glance as Trump ran well ahead of key state polls in both 2016 and 2020. (Part of why Trump could never get traction on the notion the 2020 election was stolen is that all of his narrow losses were much closer than the 2%-3% losses the polls were predicting.)

The concern I continue to have is that polls are not weighted to 2024’s turnout structure. Harris has 5x the cash and staff Trump does to turn out high propensity demographics and locales. A LOT of the middle-aged and senior white voters who delivered Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin in 2016 and kept 2020 close are dead, too infirm to vote, or moved to Florida, Texas or South Carolina where their votes go from decisive to superfluous.


20 posted on 09/27/2024 8:39:30 AM PDT by only1percent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson