I think that Website is used to try to sway the election. Look at the odds they claimed for Clinton in 2016:
Posted on 09/10/2024 9:57:30 PM PDT by zeestephen
9:56 PM PST (Updated every minute)
Kamala - 51.7%
Trump - 46.7%
(Excerpt) Read more at electionbettingodds.com ...
Bullcrap.
Thanks, Never Trumper. How does that affect the EC?
I think that Website is used to try to sway the election. Look at the odds they claimed for Clinton in 2016:
I fully agree with those betting odds. But I also trust in God’s timing. If God wants Trump to win, out of His mercy towards our country, then He has something up His sleeve to turn the tide. It won’t be because Trump is so great, Trump is so strong, or Kamala won or lost a debate. It’ll be because God wants the credit.
And if Harris wins: well then He’ll really need to help us all. And that may be the goal. To get everyone to realize how much we need Him.
They were 2:1 Harris yesterday, as listed on one FR thread.
Your argument is with the gamblers - not with me.
Don't like the numbers?
Bet your own money against the trend.
>> But I also trust in God’s timing. If God wants Trump to win, out of His mercy towards our country, then He has something up His sleeve to turn the tide. It won’t be because Trump is so great, Trump is so strong, or Kamala won or lost a debate. It’ll be because God wants the credit.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ VALID ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
(and I believe GOD indeed has a plan for President Trump)
The ABC “moderators” were the most biased in history, and Harris very clearly had rehearsed specific, female-emotional answers to questions she was obvious given in advance.
You mean more so than with a corrupt senile pedophile we have now? Pretty lame.
Do you know how betting odds work? The betting odds are determined by actual bets being placed.
Polymarket has it at 49-49
Trump did himself no favors last night. He took Kamala’s bait instead of keeping focus on her record and outrageous policy positions.
People lose money on the NFL every week.
I get that professional betters are rapped up in this, but I personally don’t think Harris gained a single voter tonight (in fact see some focus group clips on twitter being posted where apparently Trump’s closing statement went over very good.)
Amen. LORD, please shield Trump with Your favor and supernaturally strengthen him. Please also renew him and transform him.
(And I pray for Kamala’s salvation as an individual, but outside of politics.)
Stossel supports gun rights and free market capitalism.
He is further to the Left on Immigration, but no worse than many Republicans.
In 2016, the Hillary Clinton-Donald Trump odds simply mean that four out of five bettors picked Hillary Clinton.
That was a completely reasonable bet.
Without Jill Stein and the Green Party pulling votes away from Hillary in WI, MI, and PA, Trump would have lost those three states, and the election.
>> (And I pray for Kamala’s salvation as an individual, but outside of politics.)
Yes. “For we are not fighting against flesh-and-blood enemies, but against evil rulers and authorities of the unseen world, against mighty powers in this dark world, and against evil spirits in the heavenly places.”
I see that the Pearl Clutcher’s are out tonight. Noooo! Trump Blew it!!! It’s the end of the world!!!
My wife and I watched this biased debate in separate rooms. Purposefully. We met when it was over and discussed it. She came away with the definite impression that Trump won. She was very cognizant of the extreme bias against Trump by the “moderators”, the total lack of any antagonism whatsoever towards Harris was painfully obvious.
Her comeaway was this was a predictable hitjob against Trump. He was visibly irritated at some points but, justifiably so.
She told me that she felt the same way.
She said she admires Trump’s willingness to go into the lion’s den over and over again but, she thinks he doesn’t need to continue to do so.
I agree with my wife assessment.
I guarantee soros money is pushing kamala numbers
Someone like soros can move the market.
The ABC “moderators” were the most biased in history
That was well known going in. Definately NOT a surprise. It was Fox News’s turn. The first debate was already with CNN.
Harris very clearly had rehearsed specific, female-emotional answers to questions she was obvious given in advance.
She probably did but her opposition unwittingly lowered the expectations of her performance and inability to speak to a level so low that even a 5 year old would have looked like a winner.
If you say she’s as sharp as a tack and can run circles around some of the wisest in the country behind closed doors, this same debate would have been a different result.
Trump didn’t lose the debate. It’s just that Kamala Harris did not self-destruct in stupidity during the debate as has been predicted.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.